sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• Time is an illusion, PD
  • Re: Time is an illusion, Uncle Al
    • Re: Time is an illusion, Tim Golden
  • Re: Time is an illusion, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Time is an illusion, PD
      • Re: Time is an illusion, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Barbourism (Re: Time is an illusion), MobyDikc
• Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA, OsherD
    • Re: Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA, OsherD
      • Re: Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA, OsherD
      • Re: Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA, OsherD
      • Re: Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA, OsherD
• Postscientism, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Postscientism, tadchem
  • Re: Postscientism, Uncle Al
• A Snapshot of a Photon, Bew
  • Re: A Snapshot of a Photon, Uncle Al
  • Re: A Snapshot of a Photon, Sam Wormley
• Quantum Algebra: Where It Went Wrong and Right, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Algebra: Where It Went Wrong and Right, OsherD
    • Re: Quantum Algebra: Where It Went Wrong and Right, OsherD
• Re: Anybody know the weight density of k?, Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Density falls at the event horizon?, Greg Neill
• Re: Physics is, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Physics is, Sam Wormley
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether, Traveler
• Light and Electromagnetism, jmoy . matecon
  • Re: Light and Electromagnetism, srp
  • Re: Light and Electromagnetism, *** rD
  • Re: Light and Electromagnetism, T Wake
  • Re: Light and Electromagnetism, Uncle Al
• Stop Press: Spider survives microwave, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Stop Press: Spider survives microwave, Greysky
    • Re: Stop Press: Spider survives microwave, *** rD
• much slower than light, Joe
  • Re: much slower than light, *** rD
  • Re: much slower than light, CWatters
  • Re: much slower than light, srp
• Interference Patterns Simplicity..., Scan
  • Re: Interference Patterns Simplicity..., Scan
• Re: "In Search of the Big Bang" (brief review), N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "In Search of the Big Bang" (brief review), G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Silver Pullet Defeats Himself, Mitch Perkins
• Re: Courage?, cbrown
• Capillary pump ?, Externet
  • Re: Capillary pump ?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Capillary pump ?, Andy Resnick
• Re: PROFILE OF ABUSER ALAN SCHWARTZ "Uncle Al" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com> (Was: Re: BHARAT GETS READY WITH AMBITIOUS SCIENCE PROJECT), yt56erd
• Young's modulus units, rgiuly
  • Re: Young's modulus units, CWatters
  • Re: Young's modulus units, operator jay
• Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy, T Wake
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Source of Gravitational Energy, Sam Wormley
• Re: Americans planning to colonize the moon, Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: We can't see light in a black hole Twake?, T Wake
• Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, p6
  • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, John Sefton
    • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, p6
      • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, John Sefton
      • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, p6
    • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, Bjoern Feuerbacher
  • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, p6
  • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, Uncle Al
    • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, Y.Porat
  • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, Y.Porat
    • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, p6
      • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, Y.Porat
      • Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers, tadchem
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 30, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Beat frequencies and optical properties?, michalchik
  • Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?, Zigoteau
  • Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?, Andy Resnick
• All right -exposed to nukes, Upchucky
  • Re: All right -exposed to nukes, T Wake
  • Re: All right -exposed to nukes, jimp
  • Re: All right -exposed to nukes, Uncle Al
  • Re: All right -exposed to nukes, yt56erd
• Quantum Algebra, Local Quantum Field Theory, Conformal Field Theory, OsherD
  • Re: Quantum Algebra, Local Quantum Field Theory, Conformal Field Theory, OsherD
    • Re: Quantum Algebra, Local Quantum Field Theory, Conformal Field Theory, OsherD
• SR clock synchronization, xray4abc
  • Re: SR clock synchronization, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: SR clock synchronization, Uncle Al
• Room Temp Liquid Sodium, Sam Wormley
• Nick cant answer questions so starts new threads, T Wake
  • What questions Twake?, macromitch
    • The ones, T Wake
    • Re: What questions Twake?, Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Traveler
    • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, T Wake
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Traveler
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, T Wake
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Traveler
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, yt56erd
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Bob Cain
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Traveler
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, hanson
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Traveler
  • Re: Time Travel Crackpot Brian Greene on the Art Bell Show, Robert Kolker
• particles traveling at light speed, lemonus
  • Re: particles traveling at light speed, T Wake
    • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Y.Porat
    • Re: particles traveling at light speed, zlham
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, bz
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, lemonus
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, T Wake
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, bz
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, mmeron
  • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Sam Wormley
    • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Y.Porat
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Sam Wormley
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Y.Porat
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Sam Wormley
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, T Wake
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Y.Porat
      • Re: particles traveling at light speed, yt56erd
  • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Uncle Al
    • Re: particles traveling at light speed, Y.Porat
• Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics, Sam Wormley
• What are the chances of tunneling *back* through a barrier, macromitch
  • Re: What are the chances of tunneling *back* through a barrier, yt56erd
  • Message not available
    • Re: What are the chances of tunneling *back* through a barrier, macromitch
      • Re: What are the chances of tunneling *back* through a barrier, T Wake
      • Re: What are the chances of tunneling *back* through a barrier, yt56erd
• Re: What is the principal difference between a photon and a neutrino?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What is the principal difference between a photon and aneutrino?, FrediFizzx
• MHD GENERATOR TURBINE, mustafaumutsarac
• turbine from MHD generator, mustafaumutsarac
  • Re: turbine from MHD generator, Uncle Al
    • Re: turbine from MHD generator, Traveler
  • Re: turbine from MHD generator, The Ghost In The Machine
• Giant Blob headed to Earth by 5500 AD ? Blame it on the Gum Nebula star explosion @15,000 years ago, it may have melted last ice age, caused ozon hole, volcanos and earth quakes, (Supernova Remnant in Puppis & Vela)Covering 40-60% of the Southern Sky, Br Dan Izzo
  • Re: Giant Blob headed to Earth by 5500 AD ? Blame it on the Gum Nebula star explosion @15,000 years ago, it may have melted last ice age, caused ozon hole, volcanos and earth quakes, (Supernova Remnant in Puppis & Vela)Covering 40-60% of the Southern Sky, Uncle Al
    • Re: Giant Blob headed to Earth by 5500 AD ? Blame it on the Gum Nebula star explosion @15,000 years ago, it may have melted last ice age, caused ozon hole, volcanos and earth quakes, (Supernova Remnant in Puppis & Vela)Covering 40-60% of the Southern Sky, The Ghost In The Machine
• GEO THERMAL HEAT PUMPS can save over 50% on heating costs, Do you have abandoned Oil Wells in your District ?, Br Dan Izzo
  • Re: GEO THERMAL HEAT PUMPS can save over 50% on heating costs, Do you have abandoned Oil Wells in your District ?, jimp
  • Re: GEO THERMAL HEAT PUMPS can save over 50% on heating costs, Do you have abandoned Oil Wells in your District ?, Uncle Al
• Fine Structure Constants(plural), Golden Boar
  • Re: Fine Structure Constants(plural), Baugh
• Savain's Delusion, Robert Kolker
  • Re: Savain's Delusion, Quantum Mirror
    • Re: Savain's Delusion, T Wake
  • Re: Savain's Delusion, Traveler
    • Re: Savain's Delusion, Jack Martinelli
    • Re: Savain's Delusion, Platopes
• Cost of QM and Optics tutor, Reece
  • Re: Cost of QM and Optics tutor, PD
• Re: bathroom scale hysteresis, John C . Polasek
  • Re: bathroom scale hysteresis, AJW
• A SIMPLE QST BUT REALLY SCI.PHY, kuttu
  • Re: A SIMPLE QST BUT REALLY SCI.PHY, PD
  • Re: A SIMPLE QST BUT REALLY SCI.PHY, Uncle Al
• Cooper pairs in superconductor, p6
  • Re: Cooper pairs in superconductor, Sam Wormley
• Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
  • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Jim Black
  • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Zigoteau
    • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
    • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Andr? Michaud
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., John Sefton
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Y.Porat
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Y.Porat
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., srp
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., John Sefton
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Zigoteau
  • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., macromitch
    • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., macromitch
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., macromitch
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Y.Porat
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Y.Porat
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., p6
      • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., Y.Porat
  • Re: Orbiting charge radiating..., macromitch
• Re: The ZPF Is An Ether ..., Ben Rudiak-Gould
• doubt, vignesh
  • Re: doubt, Uncle Al
• when physics goes Chang-Jiang, dedanoe
• some quotes, dedanoe
• Fundamental Transition of the Hydrogen Atom?, Binesh Bannerjee
  • Re: Fundamental Transition of the Hydrogen Atom?, Baugh
    • Re: Fundamental Transition of the Hydrogen Atom?, John Sefton
      • Re: Fundamental Transition of the Hydrogen Atom?, Baugh
• Einstein: Newton's cancer, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Einstein: Newton's cancer, Dirk Van de moortel
• Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Wind at sunset?, jimp
    • Re: Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Wind at sunset?, Maleki
  • Re: Wind at sunset?, hhc314
    • Re: Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Wind at sunset?, mountain man
    • Re: Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Wind at sunset?, mountain man
      • Re: Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Wind at sunset?, mountain man
      • Re: Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Message not available
      • Re: Wind at sunset?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Wind at sunset?, RP
  • Re: Wind at sunset?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Wind at sunset?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Locality in Expansion-Contraction, OsherD
  • Re: Locality in Expansion-Contraction, OsherD
    • Re: Locality in Expansion-Contraction, OsherD
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 27 May 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
• Speed of 'c' = Black hole ??, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Speed of 'c' = Black hole ??, Sam Wormley
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, Uncle Al
  • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, Tracy Hall
  • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, The President
    • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, Uncle Al
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, Robert Kolker
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington,DC, Uncle Al
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington,DC, Robert Kolker
      • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC, Jan Panteltje
• Life of a particle, Raymond Yohros
  • Re: Life of a particle, PD
  • Re: Life of a particle, Old Man
    • Re: Life of a particle, Raymond Yohros
      • Re: Life of a particle, Bjoern Feuerbacher
  • Re: Life of a particle, Uncle Al
    • Re: Life of a particle, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Life of a particle, Raymond Yohros
    • Re: Life of a particle, Raymond Yohros
      • Re: Life of a particle, Uncle Al
• Foundations of statistical physics, Christophe
  • Re: Foundations of statistical physics, Maleki
  • Re: Foundations of statistical physics, Andy Resnick
• Physics News Update -- Number 732, May 24, 2005 by Phil Schewe and Ben Stein, Sam Wormley
• Dimensional Aspects of Rare, Fairly Frequent, Very Frequent Events, OsherD
  • Re: Dimensional Aspects of Rare, Fairly Frequent, Very Frequent Events, OsherD
    • Re: Dimensional Aspects of Rare, Fairly Frequent, Very Frequent Events, OsherD
      • Re: Dimensional Aspects of Rare, Fairly Frequent, Very Frequent Events, OsherD
      • Re: Dimensional Aspects of Rare, Fairly Frequent, Very Frequent Events, OsherD
      • Re: Dimensional Aspects of Rare, Fairly Frequent, Very Frequent Events, OsherD
• Crop Circles, kuttu
  • Re: Crop Circles, bz
  • Re: Crop Circles, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: Crop Circles, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Crop Circles, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Crop Circles, CWatters
  • Re: Crop Circles, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Crop Circles, John Sefton
      • Re: Crop Circles, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Crop Circles, John Sefton
      • Re: Crop Circles, CWatters
      • Re: Crop Circles, tadchem
      • Re: Crop Circles, oconnell
    • Re: Crop Circles, markwh04
  • Re: Crop Circles, Upchucky
  • Re: Crop Circles, Uncle Al
    • Re: Crop Circles, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Crop Circles, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Crop Circles, markwh04
• Re: The Power and the Glory, Richard Herring
• Spontaneous improvements on the horizon (May 26), Sam Wormley
• Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
  • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
    • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
      • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
      • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
      • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
      • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, OsherD
  • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, Greysky
  • Re: Observing The Double-Slit Experiment Can Change It Via PI, Quantum Mirror
• Re: A lot of useful info, thanks, Mark Fergerson
• basic diffraction, Tim Golden
  • Re: basic diffraction, Jim Black
  • Re: basic diffraction, Quantum Mirror
    • Re: basic diffraction, mmeron
      • Re: basic diffraction, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: basic diffraction, Richard Herring
      • Re: basic diffraction, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: basic diffraction, Andy Resnick
      • Re: basic diffraction, mmeron
      • Re: basic diffraction, Richard Herring
      • Re: basic diffraction, mmeron
  • Re: basic diffraction, Andy Resnick
    • Re: basic diffraction, mmeron
      • Re: basic diffraction, Richard Herring
      • Re: basic diffraction, mmeron
    • Re: basic diffraction, Tim Golden
      • Re: basic diffraction, mmeron
• stuck on a question, Gaganpreet Singh Arora
  • Re: stuck on a question, Tim Golden
  • Re: stuck on a question, Jim Black
  • Re: stuck on a question, Rene Tschaggelar
  • Re: stuck on a question, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• spinning black hole, karan
  • Re: spinning black hole, Jim Black
    • Re: spinning black hole, karan
      • Re: spinning black hole, Uncle Al
      • Re: spinning black hole, Jim Black
      • Re: spinning black hole, Jim Black
      • Re: spinning black hole, karan
      • Re: spinning black hole, Jim Black
      • Re: spinning black hole, carlip-nospam
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • spinning black hole, karan
• Re: Big Bang Bung, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Big Bang Bung, yt56erd
• Re: Gravitational inertia, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Gravitational inertia, Sam Wormley
• Re: Ways of Confirming Electron Configurations, Timo Nieminen
• Statistical mechanics problem, Mike Tyka
  • Re: Statistical mechanics problem, tadchem
  • Re: Statistical mechanics problem, Baugh
• current state of technique has pmobile, Dobri Karagorgov
• Speed Limit Theory, George
  • Re: Speed Limit Theory, kuttu
  • Re: Speed Limit Theory, Timothy
  • Re: Speed Limit Theory, patrick
• Black Holes and HUP, Old Man
  • Re: Black Holes and HUP, Igor
  • Re: Black Holes and HUP, Y.Porat
  • Re: Black Holes and HUP, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Black Holes and HUP, Mark Fergerson
  • Re: Black Holes and HUP, richard miller
  • Re: Black Holes and HUP, Nick
• Who's Faulty thinking., cnctutwiler
• Locality Thread, OsherD
• OT Firefox tweaks, Boris Mohar
• James Baugh, Al
  • Re: James Baugh, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: James Baugh, Al
      • Re: James Baugh, Baugh
    • Re: James Baugh, PD
      • Re: James Baugh, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: James Baugh, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: James Baugh, Baugh
  • Re: James Baugh, J. Horta
• Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, shepherdmoon
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, CWatters
    • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, shepherdmoon
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, PD
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Herman Trivilino
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, shepherdmoon
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Ed Hanna
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Herman Trivilino
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Herman Trivilino
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, CWatters
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, shepherdmoon
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, CWatters
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Herman Trivilino
    • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Old Man
    • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, shepherdmoon
      • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Tim Golden
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, PD
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Uncle Al
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Uncle Al
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Herman Trivilino
  • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Rotation speed of parts of a rigid body, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Windmills and the Craptain, Pete Verdon
  • Re: Windmills and the Craptain, Nick
• Locality Principle, Its Misinterpretation and Modification, OsherD
  • Re: Locality Principle, Its Misinterpretation and Modification, OsherD
    • Re: Locality Principle, Its Misinterpretation and Modification, OsherD
      • Re: Locality Principle, Its Misinterpretation and Modification, OsherD
      • Re: Locality Principle, Its Misinterpretation and Modification, OsherD
  • Re: Locality Principle, Its Misinterpretation and Modification, markwh04
• A problem encountered in a teaching lab, Haihui Guo
  • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, tadchem
    • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, Haihui Guo
      • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, tadchem
      • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, Old Man
  • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, hhc314
  • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, chuckup
    • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, PD
  • Re: A problem encountered in a teaching lab, greywolf42
• Star Gates unstable?, Jack Sarfatti
  • Re: Star Gates unstable?, cirejcon
• Plurality-Oriented vs Individual-Oriented Spaces and Researchers, OsherD
  • Re: Plurality-Oriented vs Individual-Oriented Spaces and Researchers, OsherD
• FTL Question, George
  • Re: FTL Question, tadchem
  • Re: FTL Question, Paul Cardinale
  • Re: FTL Question, Greysky
  • Re: FTL Question, George
    • Re: FTL Question, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: FTL Question, tadchem
      • Re: FTL Question, mmeron
    • Re: FTL Question, cirejcon
      • Re: FTL Question, mmeron
      • Re: FTL Question, cirejcon
      • Re: FTL Question, mmeron
    • Re: FTL Question, Steven Gray
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: FTL Question, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: FTL Question, Alu Cine
      • Re: FTL Question, Carlos L
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, macromitch
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, macromitch
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Message not available
      • Re: FTL Question, yt56erd
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Sam Wormley
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, bz
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Nick
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Nick
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Message not available
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
      • Re: FTL Question, Spud
      • Re: FTL Question, Lefty
• New Korean hand held device can stop cars, post
  • Re: New Korean hand held device can stop cars, Sam Wormley
    • Re: New Korean hand held device can stop cars, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Koreans build cars that can be stopped by hand held devices., Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Koreans build cars that can be stopped by hand held devices., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: New Korean hand held device can stop cars, tadchem
    • Re: New Korean hand held device can stop cars, Gregory L. Hansen
• quantum Hall effect, Allan Adler
• Amino acids meet electronics, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Amino acids meet electronics, jimp
    • Re: Amino acids meet electronics, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Amino acids meet electronics, jimp
      • Re: Amino acids meet electronics, The Ghost In The Machine
• Blowing up a planet., mike3
  • Re: Blowing up a planet., Uncle Al
    • Re: Blowing up a planet., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., Uncle Al
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Blowing up a planet., mike3
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., jimp
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., mike3
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., PD
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., mike3
    • Re: Blowing up a planet., The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Blowing up a planet., phobos
  • Re: Blowing up a planet., Chuckie
  • Re: Blowing up a planet., Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
    • Re: Blowing up a planet., Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Blowing up a planet., Ross A. Finlayson
  • Re: Blowing up a planet., Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Blowing up a planet., PD
  • Re: Blowing up a planet., tadchem
    • Re: Blowing up a planet., mike3
• Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
  • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
    • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Nonlocality Point-Set Anomaly vs PI, Ross A. Finlayson
• How big is your light cone Old Man?, Nick
  • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, Nick
      • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, Nick
      • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, yt56erd
      • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, T Wake
      • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, PD
  • Re: How big is your light cone Old Man?, The Ghost In The Machine
• Granular dynamics and 80s novelty item, simon
  • Re: Granular dynamics and 80s novelty item, Ed Hanna
• Schenectady GE 100 MeV Betatron, srp
  • Re: Schenectady GE 100 MeV Betatron, Chuckie
    • Re: Schenectady GE 100 MeV Betatron, srp
• controlled perpetuum mobile by dedanoe, Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, Dan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, briggs
  • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, CWatters
  • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, briggs
  • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, briggs
  • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, CWatters
      • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Sailing Directly Upwind, CWatters
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 732 May 24, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 732 May 24, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, John C . Polasek
    • Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 732 May 24, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, RP
• Locality vs Nonlocality: Raymond Y. Chiao vs PI, OsherD
  • Re: Locality vs Nonlocality: Raymond Y. Chiao vs PI, OsherD
    • Re: Locality vs Nonlocality: Raymond Y. Chiao vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Locality vs Nonlocality: Raymond Y. Chiao vs PI, Nick
      • Re: Locality vs Nonlocality: Raymond Y. Chiao vs PI, OsherD
      • Re: Locality vs Nonlocality: Raymond Y. Chiao vs PI, OsherD
• Electromagnetic Weapons, Raktizer Omheit
  • Re: Electromagnetic Weapons, Baugh
    • Re: Electromagnetic Weapons, Raktizer Omheit
  • Re: Electromagnetic Weapons, Uncle Al
    • Re: Electromagnetic Weapons, Raktizer Omheit
• Ferromagnetism and Pauli Exclusion principle, bamwam82
  • Re: Ferromagnetism and Pauli Exclusion principle, Old Man
  • Re: Ferromagnetism and Pauli Exclusion principle, Old Man
• Better Light Clocks, Sam Wormley
• Tackling hospital epidemics, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, Maleki
  • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, tadchem
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, bz
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, tadchem
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, bz
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, bz
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, Maleki
      • Message not available
      • Re: Tackling hospital epidemics, Gregory L. Hansen
• Maximum resolution of spy satellites., michalchik
  • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Sam Wormley
    • Message not available
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Sam Wormley
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Old Man
    • Message not available
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Old Man
    • Message not available
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Morituri-|-Max
  • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Old Man
    • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., daal-daroo Aum
    • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., michalchik
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., tadchem
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., mmeron
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Old Man
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Andy Resnick
  • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., mmeron
    • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Jerry
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., mmeron
    • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., bz
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., mmeron
  • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Baugh
    • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., mmeron
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., michalchik
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., mmeron
      • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Andy Resnick
  • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites., Andy Resnick
• Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, ShalomShlomo
  • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communication ?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communication ?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Robert Kolker
  • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Steven Gray
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, ShalomShlomo
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, bz
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Steven Gray
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Tim Golden
  • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Old Man
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Nick
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Old Man
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Nick
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, yt56erd
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Old Man
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Nick
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Nick
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Old Man
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Nick
  • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, ShalomShlomo
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Message not available
    • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, briggs
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Greysky
      • Message not available
      • Re: Paradox's caused by Faster than Light Communciation ?, Greysky
• A Unified Field Theory by Lloyd Dudley Burris, reactor1967
  • Re: A Unified Field Theory by Lloyd Dudley Burris, Uncle Al
  • Re: A Unified Field Theory by Lloyd Dudley Burris, Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do the other forces effect light?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Do the other forces effect light?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, OsherD
  • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, OsherD
    • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, tadchem
      • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, tadchem
  • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, jimp
    • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, hhc314
      • Re: Operation Cinderella and Uncle Al, jimp
• Tight binding & density of states (DoS), Gernot Pfanner
  • Re: Tight binding & density of states (DoS), Zigoteau
  • Re: Tight binding & density of states (DoS), Old Man
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, May 23, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Battery & Electric Field, Lorraine
  • Re: Battery & Electric Field, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Battery & Electric Field, daal daroo Aum
  • Re: Battery & Electric Field, John C . Polasek
• lorentz transformations with angle, albert
  • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, george_llew_jones
      • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, george_llew_jones
      • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, george_llew_jones
  • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, Uncle Al
    • Re: lorentz transformations with angle, Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Black Holes Do Not Exist!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Black Holes Do Not Exist!, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Black Holes Do Not Exist!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Black Holes Do Not Exist!, Nick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Black Holes Do Not Exist!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Black Holes Do Not Exist!, Sam Wormley
• Re: What's inertia & how's it measured?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: What's inertia & how's it measured?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: What's inertia & how's it measured?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: What's inertia & how's it measured?, Sam Wormley
• Pleroma, Creatura, and Biophysics, bill
  • Re: Pleroma, Creatura, and Biophysics, Old Man
  • Re: Pleroma, Creatura, and Biophysics, Jan Panteltje
• Galaxies and antimatter, Ray Johnstone
  • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Nick
  • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Ray Johnstone
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Nick
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, yt56erd
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, T Wake
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Old Man
    • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Nick
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Old Man
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Nick
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, PD
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Ray Johnstone
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Nick
      • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, yt56erd
  • Re: Galaxies and antimatter, Uncle Al
• Re: design minimal-steaming bathshower?, D Akers
  • Re: design minimal-steaming bathshower?, CWatters
    • Re: design minimal-steaming bathshower?, Lefty
• Ricci flow, Jan Bielawski
• Entropy and the origins of life, kj
  • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Jim Black
    • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, kj
  • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Uncle Al
    • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Jan Bielawski
      • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, tadchem
      • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Jan Bielawski
      • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Nick
    • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, Nick
    • Re: Entropy and the origins of life, markwh04
• 1 / 2, Dirk Selis
  • Re: 1 / 2, Morituri-|-Max
    • Re: 1 / 2, Dirk Selis
      • Re: 1 / 2, hhc314
      • Re: 1 / 2, Dirk Selis
  • Re: 1 / 2, hhc314
    • Re: 1 / 2, george_llew_jones
      • Re: 1 / 2, mmeron
      • Re: 1 / 2, Ross A. Finlayson
• General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
  • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
    • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
      • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: General Covariance, Principle of Equivalence, and PI, OsherD
• Evolution of consciousness, patrick
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, yt56erd
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, yt56erd
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, John Popelish
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, jpopelish
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, OsherD
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Quantum Mirror
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Quantum Mirror
  • Message not available
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, zhayne
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Morituri-|-Max
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Uncle Al
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, OsherD
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, OsherD
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Martin Hogbin
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Maleki
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, hanson
  • Re: Evolution of consciousness, John Bailey
    • Re: Evolution of consciousness, patrick
      • Re: Evolution of consciousness, Jan Panteltje
• The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets, Deen
  • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets, yt56erd
  • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets, Uncle Al
• Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, Sam Wormley
  • Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, Traveler
    • Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, yt56erd
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, Traveler
    • Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, yt56erd
      • Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, Traveler
      • Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE, yt56erd
• dedanoe hackin the global holly balance, Dobri Karagorgov
  • Re: dedanoe hackin the global holly balance, The Ghost In The Machine
• Scientists levitate heavy objects, neutron_p
  • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, hhc314
      • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, Baugh
    • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, tadchem
      • Re: Scientists levitate heavy objects, bz
• Archimedes in the particle acellerator, panteltje
  • Re: Archimedes in the particle acellerator, Dobri Karagorgov
• Who's first?, John Sefton
  • Re: Who's first?, operator jay
• Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator, dkjk
  • Re: Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator, Zigoteau
    • Re: Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator, dkjk
      • Re: Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator, Zigoteau
      • Re: Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator, dkjk
      • Re: Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator, Zigoteau
• questions - double slit, dx
  • Re: questions - double slit, Martin Hogbin
    • Re: questions - double slit, dx
      • Re: questions - double slit, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Message not available
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, dx
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: questions - double slit, Old Man
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, Old Man
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, Old Man
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
  • Message not available
    • Re: questions - double slit, Sam Wormley
  • Re: questions - double slit, Herman Trivilino
  • Message not available
    • Re: questions - double slit, dx
  • Re: questions - double slit, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
    • Re: questions - double slit, dx
      • Re: questions - double slit, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
      • Re: questions - double slit, Old Man
  • Re: questions - double slit, Old Man
    • Re: questions - double slit, dx
      • Re: questions - double slit, dx
      • Re: questions - double slit, Quantum Mirror
      • Re: questions - double slit, Martin Hogbin
      • Re: questions - double slit, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• collisions: lab frame and C frame, dumb_founded
  • Re: collisions: lab frame and C frame, Old Man
    • Re: collisions: lab frame and C frame, Jim Black
      • Re: collisions: lab frame and C frame, Old Man
      • Re: collisions: lab frame and C frame, Jim Black
• Are Uncle Al's Cronies/Stooges Divisible By 7?, OsherD
• Is 7 Divisible By arXiv?, OsherD
• Is 7 Divisible By Uncle Al and Friends?, OsherD
  • Re: Is 7 Divisible By Uncle Al and Friends?, yt56erd
    • Re: Is 7 Divisible By Uncle Al and Friends?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: Is 7 Divisible By Uncle Al and Friends?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Is 7 Divisible By Uncle Al and Friends?, Dobri Karagorgov
    • Re: Is 7 Divisible By Uncle Al and Friends?, The Ghost In The Machine
• The Nature of Mass, Skrow
  • Re: The Nature of Mass, Uncle Al
  • Re: The Nature of Mass, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Nature of Mass, Skrow
    • Re: The Nature of Mass, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Nature of Mass, Sam Wormley
      • Re: The Nature of Mass, TomGee
• Re: Fields...Baa...mint sauce, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Fields...Baa...mint sauce, Old Man
• An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Sam Wormley
  • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, Uncle Al
    • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, Mark Martin
    • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, Maleki
      • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisibleby 7, Maleki
  • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Baugh
  • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Jim Black
    • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Sam Wormley
    • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Maleki
      • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Sam Wormley
      • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Maleki
      • Re: An ingenious, recently developed method tests if a number is divisible by 7, Maleki
• Double Slit Experiment Kit, Spitzer
  • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, panteltje
    • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Spitzer
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, panteltje
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Quantum Mirror
  • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Uncle Al
    • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, panteltje
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, panteltje
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Spitzer
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Quantum Mirror
  • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Spitzer
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Zigoteau
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Spitzer
      • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Zigoteau
  • Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• reduced carbon (was High strength fibers for high pressure tubes., bz
• Neat Trick, Old Man
  • Re: Neat Trick, Bjoern Feuerbacher
• An international team of nuclear physicists has created zinc-54, Sam Wormley
  • Re: An international team of nuclear physicists has created zinc-54, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: An international team of nuclear physicists has created zinc-54, Uncle Al
• "Reliability Theory of Aging", University of Chicago Seminar, May 24, Leonid Gavrilov
  • Re: "Reliability Theory of Aging", University of Chicago Seminar, May 24, Leonid Gavrilov
• Gravity and Unifield Field Theory, Lloyd
  • Re: Gravity and Unifield Field Theory, Nick
  • Re: Gravity and Unifield Field Theory, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Gravity and Unifield Field Theory, Uncle Al
• A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
  • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
    • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, Zigoteau
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, Nick
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, Nick
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
      • Re: A Critique of On Bullshit by Professor Emeritus Harry G. Frankfurt, Princeton, OsherD
• radwaste (was High strength fibers for high pressure tubes., bz
• Mechanics Question, pmb
  • Re: Mechanics Question, Edward Green
    • Re: Mechanics Question, pmb
      • Re: Mechanics Question, Edward Green
  • Re: Mechanics Question, Baugh
    • Re: Mechanics Question, Edward Green
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 May 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
  • Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 20 May 05 Washington, DC, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• hystory of modern physics, stefjnoskynov
  • Re: hystory of modern physics, FrediFizzx
  • Re: hystory of modern physics, PD
  • Re: hystory of modern physics, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
  • Re: hystory of modern physics, John Sefton
  • Re: hystory of modern physics, Maleki
• taxes (was Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.), bz
• Creation of the Universe Debate, Jack Sarfatti
  • Re: Creation of the Universe Debate, OsherD
• If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
  • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
    • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, Uncle Al
      • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
      • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
      • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
      • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
      • Re: If Google arXiv Brands You, Try Institut Mittag-Leffler Sweden, OsherD
• non-condensing relative humidity, sawitzky2000
  • Re: non-condensing relative humidity, jimp
    • Re: non-condensing relative humidity, sawitzky2000
      • Re: non-condensing relative humidity, Uncle Al
• Do Virtual Photons Exist?, Rettel
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Do Virtual Photons Exist?, Uncle Al
• Re: What Deep Blue showed ..., Timo Nieminen
• Franz Heymann, Mike Lyle
  • Re: Franz Heymann, PD
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Steven Gray
    • Re: Franz Heymann, hhc314
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Greysky
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Bjoern Feuerbacher
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Potte
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Robert Kolker
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Uncle Al
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Traveler
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Franz Heymann, OsherD
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Randy Poe
      • Re: Franz Heymann, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Franz Heymann, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Ken Muldrew
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Mark Fergerson
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Traveler
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
      • Re: Franz Heymann, hanson
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Traveler
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Edward Green
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Franz Heymann, Maleki
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Mitch Perkins
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Franz Heymann, mmeron
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Franz Heymann, Edward Green
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Minor Crank
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Eric Gisse
  • Re: Franz Heymann, Angelo
• Do Neutrinos Have Spin?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?, Gregory L. Hansen