Re: Uncle Dickhead, So fucking what? LOL

In article <5igde.40694$NU4.7186@attbi_s22>, Sam Wormley
<swormley1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
>>>>>Sam Wormley wrote:
>>> Show us your "correct" space-time diagrams. Don't you wish
>>> everybody did?
>>
>> You asking me or eightwings? :-)
>>
>
>Eightwings isn't worth having a conversation with as he is too busy
>fixating on other people's asses. However I do think that many posters
>who criticize SR without a good understanding of the subject, would
>benefit from spacetime diagrams accurately representing the arguments
>at hand.

Tut, tut. *You* are the ass kisser, Wormley. Not I. You continuously
get on other people's case for not understanding SR and GR. The
problem is that nobody really understands SR or GR. Nobody knows why
clocks slow down and why rulers contrast. Nobody understand why c is
constant in all FORs. And nobody knows why Heisenberg's uncertainty
principle exists.

Heck, nobody understood Newton's stuff either. You want to know why?
Because it did not really explain anything. A velocity or a gravity
equation does not explain why things move and why they fall. That, Mr.
***-munch, is what people want to understand. They want to have a
fundamental understanding. They are tired of people who keep on
claiming that they are doing physics when in fact they are just math
engineers.

But worse, some of the most famous physicists/scientists in the world
are just as clueless WRT SR and GR as the rest of the population. You
must include notorious crackpots like Kip "Wormhole" Thorne, Stephen
Hawking, Kurt "Lunatic" Godel, Richard Feynmann & John Wheeler
(advanced and retarded time-travelling waves), David "Quantum
Computing" Deutsch, and many others on your list of people that are
clueless.

Of course, you want to know why these illustrious cranks should be on
your list, right? It's because they claim that GR does not forbid time
travel in closed time-like curves. They do it even though anybody with
two neurons between their ears understands that time cannot change
because a changing time is self-referential.

And don't you dare deny it, Wormley. I got dozens of references to
prove that they do in fact claim those things, not only in popular
publications but in peer-reviewed journals as well.

http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Crackpots/notorious.htm

The question is: why are these crackpots not on your list? Answer: the
physics community (whose asses you kiss daily on this forum, protects
its crackpots/con-artists the same way the Catholic Church protects
its pederast/pedophile priests. It's all about chicken religion and
control of mind share.

Physics can be so much more fun when we start identifying all the
crackpots that have crept into it, don't you agree, Wormley? I am not
talking about the usual cranks who really do no harm. I am talking
about the real voodoo priests of the physics community who lead the
sheep astray.

But to do that, one must stop kissing ass and grow a little bit of
backbone.

Louis Savain

The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.