Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- From: "Y.Porat" <maporat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 May 2005 03:24:37 -0700
you asked so you will get it: just as you asked as a hint):
the virtual particles
i dont know if i can call it falacy
yet i am sure it is a big hole
yet that is just my humble opinion and unserstanding
no one nominated us to be
'supervisers of physics.
all th e best
Y.Porat
-----------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- References:
- Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- From: Y.Porat
- Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- From: Eckard Blumschein
- Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- Prev by Date: Re: neutrino interaction
- Next by Date: Things Formulaic
- Previous by thread: Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- Next by thread: Re: Why did science accept obvious oddities?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|