Re: My Unified Theory, of Logic, Infinity
- From: Uncle Al <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:09:46 -0700
"Ross A. Finlayson" wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Hey, how's it going.
>
> I'm coming over from sci.logic and sci.math, those unmoderated Internet
> newsgroups with a variety of participants.
>
> Anyways, I think that if you don't ascribe to my null axiom, or
> axiom-free, theory, about the roots and deep foundations of
> mathematics, logic, and mathematical logic, that your theory theory can
> not be all of strong, consistent, complete, and concrete.
>
> That's not to say that any other null axiom theory is not the same as
> mine, only that mine offers a fulfillment of the Hilbert program and
> some EXPLANATIONS of the infinite and infinitesimal in nature, natural
> physics, physics.
>
> So anyways, please present a well-ordering of the reals. Anything
> provable in ZFC minus regularity, plus inverse, is basically provable
> in my axiom-free logical theory.
>
> Ross
>
> --
> "There can be, only one, theory."
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
- References:
- My Unified Theory, of Logic, Infinity
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- My Unified Theory, of Logic, Infinity
- Prev by Date: Re: Who is Boltzmann, Coulomb, and Avogadro?
- Next by Date: Re: Things Formulaic
- Previous by thread: Re: My Unified Theory, of Logic, Infinity
- Next by thread: Re: My Unified Theory, of Logic, Infinity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
