Re: My Unified Theory, of Logic, Infinity

Hi,

No, I don't think Goedel's undecideability follows.

Heh heh. I decided to write to you here on sci.physics because I say
whatever I want on sci.math and sci.logic already, and occasionally
sci.philosophy.meta. Ah, yes. Don't you want no paradoxes in your
logical theory?

If you've discovered a well-ordering of the reals, which are not just
decimals, congratulations, you've solved one of Hilbert's problems.
You haven't actually shown that. I say the reals as the complete
ordered field have as well a partially ordered ring structure, with the
infinitesimals, and integral iota-multiples, thus that the normal
ordering is the natural well-ordering, of the positive real numbers. A
well-ordering of the real numbers exists, please present one, or all.
That totality implied there has to do with extension of some of
Cantor's results. Consider the base, or radix, of one, or, and
infinite radix.

There can be, only one, true theory, strong, consistent, complete, and
concrete.

Consider again the consideration that the universe is comprised of
physical objects, and functions between physical objects and physical
objects are hysical objects. Then, the universe is infinite, and
infinite sets are equivalent.

There is a somewhat different reasoning about why infinite sets are
equivalent, constructively from that they are infinite via induction,
and also from inference of the necessary (to avoid paradoxes) dually
minimal and maximal ur-element of a theory.

Here's something to consider, the non-logical axioms of ZFC, except for
regularity or well-foundedness, plus what is called "inverse", are
theorems of the null axiom theory. Thus, many proven results simply
remain true, soundly.

About religion, I'll save that for later.

Ross F.

.

Relevant Pages