Re: Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 May 2005 14:50:18 -0700
Tim Golden wrote:
> Is there a conflict with probabilistic models and the scientific
> method?
No.
> Whereas a simple experiment allows for errors in the equipment and
> allows for probabilistic correction, quantum physics imposes these
> methods on the non-instrumantal portion of the experiment.
Outcomes of experiments are predicted to follow
certain probability distributions. This is a testable
hypothesis and is repeatable.
> Repeatability is a tenet of the scientific method.
> Some will argue that the quantum experiments are repeatable.
Indeed.
Consider spectral emission lines. These have finite
width due to the uncertainty principle. Does that mean
you can't test hydrogen lines against the theory of
where they should be? Of course not.
There's no more problem with this than with hypothesis
testing of any kind where outcomes are probabilistic.
And as you point out, the outcomes of all exeriments,
even macroscopic ones, are probabilistic.
So where's the problem?
- Randy
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- From: Tim Golden
- Re: Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- References:
- Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- From: Tim Golden
- Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- Prev by Date: Re: How long is a photon?
- Next by Date: Re: Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- Previous by thread: Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- Next by thread: Re: Repeatability, scientific method, and probabilistic results
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|