Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher <bjoern.feuerbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 16:12:13 +0200
zhayne wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
John Sefton wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
zhayne wrote:
[snip]
1. Explain why water has memory.
It hasn't.
Does so.
Feel free to support this claim with evidence.
[snip]
Bye, Bjoern
I think I'd better answer this for Sefton as the evidence is so obvious.
Only to people like you who are totally gullible and have no clue of proper scientific tests.
Know NAET (www.naet.com)?
When a person is allergic to egg, that person holofield is reacting to the egg
Begging the question: there is no evidence that "holofields" exist.
[snip more of the same]
As usual, you presented merely lots of unsupported assertions.
If this "NAET allergy testing kit" really works, it should be no
problem for you to come up with a reference to a carefully controlled
medical test, where its usefulnees was demonstrated. Hearsay, OTOH, isn't evidence.
I'm waiting.
Bye, Bjoern .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: zhayne
- Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- References:
- New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: zhayne
- Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: John Sefton
- Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- From: zhayne
- New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- Prev by Date: Communicating at Translight Velocities
- Next by Date: Re: quation about covalent bond.
- Previous by thread: Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- Next by thread: Re: New Atomic Model Acid Tests
- Index(es):