Re: Spin Confinement
- From: John Sefton <vegan16@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 00:03:08 -0600
logan wrote:
What is the physical reason that in an orbital, only 2 electrons of spin up and down can exist. Why can't it be 4 electrons of 2 spin up and 2 spin down as this can also balance out? I want to understand the core reason for the 2 electron limit in the Pauli Exclusion Principle.
logan
They don't fucking know, man. They just make the rules after the fact. *They have no actual physical model.*
There. There's your answer.
But the real reason is because when electrons turn they create a magnetic field, and since all these magnetic fields have the same center, they will all share the same position. This makes it necessary for the electrons to all lie in and turn the same way around the same disc (concentric rings). But an atom is not a disc, it is a sphere, so you have to sweep the disc through a spherical volume.
NOW.
When you rotate the disc in its own plane at 1, or 3, or 5, or any odd number of turns at the same time as precessing it at 2 complete turns to sweep out your sphere something wonderful happens; every particle on one side of the disc will now share its path with whatever is exactly opposite itself on the disc. Every pathway will contain a max of 2 members. Also, an electron must precess through 720 degrees before completing its orbital. It's called the Galaxy Model for the atom. It is at http://users.accesscomm.ca/john/
It is unique because QM doesn't have a physical model. They can't give you a physical reason because they can't give you a physical picture of the atom. Period. Ask them for one. They'll say, "Oh, it's like Bohr said but it's not like that."
John
.
- References:
- Spin Confinement
- From: logan
- Spin Confinement
- Prev by Date: Re: Randall-Sundrum, Einstein-Gauss-Bonnet, and PI
- Next by Date: E=mc^2
- Previous by thread: Re: Spin Confinement
- Next by thread: Re: Spin Confinement
- Index(es):