Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: "Mark Martin" <qed100@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 May 2005 08:20:05 -0700
Traveler wrote:
> In article <1116513429.225905.153830@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Mark Martin" <qed100@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >Traveler wrote:
> >
> >> The recording of the past (not the past) will indeed be used. For
the
> >> great judgement, that is.
> >
> > ZZZzzzzz...
>
> I take it you are trying to influence others with your personal
> opinion, Martin. But you do know what they say about opinions and
> assholes, don't you, Martin? Right. Everybody's got one.
Jeezus man, look who's talking.
-Mark Martin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Traveler
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- References:
- Is History recorded by nature?
- From: softwarelabus
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Traveler
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: softwarelabus
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Traveler
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Mark Martin
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Traveler
- Is History recorded by nature?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- Next by Date: Re: Who is Uncle Al?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- Next by thread: Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- Index(es):