Re: Charge
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:16:19 -0400
In article <1116521701.598618.167540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
franklinhu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Since there is no concensus on what actually causes "charge", let me
>suggest you read:
>
>http://historical.library.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/cul.math/docviewer?did=02780002&seq=&view=50&frames=0&pagenum=1
>
>This describes the Bjerknes Forces which says that if two spherical
>objects pulse in phase in a non-compressible medium, they attract. If
>they pulse out of phase, they repel. It has also been shown that in a
>compressible medium, the actions reverse and in phase will repel while
>out of phase will attract.
>
>If you consider electrons and protons like little bells which are
>ringing at the same frequency but out of phase, then you can imagine
>how the attraction of charges work through the interaction of the
>waves. Electrons ringing in phase will repell each other, as will
>protons with the same phase. But electrons and protons ringing out of
>phase will attract.
>
>I would think that the source of energy for the ringing comes from the
>ambient thermal energy and acts like a clapper on a bell. No matter how
>randomly or frequently the bell is rung, it will always ring out the
>same frequency and will attain a maximum intensity. So the random
>thermal energy is converted into a very specific frequency and phase
>and serves as the energy source for the attraction between charged
>particles.
>
>To directly address your question, a charge on an object is the result
>of it radiating a wave in a compressible medium which is at a very
>specific freqency and phase. Protons and electrons emit opposite phases
>of the same frequency which causes the attraction/repulsion.
>
>I believe that this is the fundamental mechanism for force attraction
>between charges, and since real scientists don't have the answer, it's
>as good as any.
>fhucharge
This is, of course, unmitigated crackpottery. It is certainly not as
good as any. It's crap. At least the bozos in the physics community
admit that they don't know (what makes them bozos is that they don't
care to know.)
First off, nothing can pulse in a non-compressible medium for obvious
reasons. Second, in a compressible medium, pulsing requires a constant
input of energy. Where is the energy coming from? Ambient thermal
energy, you say? What a crock! To extract thermal energy there must be
a difference in temperatures. And one more thing, what is your magical
medium composed of? Go back and rethink your dumb theory and come back
when you have something that does not sound like it was cooked up in
pre-K.
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Charge
- From: Mitch Perkins
- Re: Charge
- From: franklinhu
- Re: Charge
- References:
- Charge
- From: Robert Chug
- Re: Charge
- From: franklinhu
- Charge
- Prev by Date: Re: Attn: Quantum Vacuumists & Enhanced Aetherists
- Next by Date: Re: What's Inside A Neutron???
- Previous by thread: Re: Charge
- Next by thread: Re: Charge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|