Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...

In article <d6ompb$grs$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, glhansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gregory L. Hansen) writes:
>In article <7Fdje.104$25.20855@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> <mmeron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>In article <d6jdu3$t75$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>glhansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gregory L. Hansen) writes:
>
>>>I've never been very good with thick crystals. But they do give some
>>>illuminating demonstrations of the wave nature of particles, like
>>>Pendulloesung interference and anamolous absorption.
>>
>>Yes, these are fascinating. As for "being good with this", well, the
>>theory is both highly technical and not especially glamorous, the only
>>ones good with it are those who need it.
>
>I know from reading sci.physics which parts are glamorous.

Aha:-)))

> Everybody and his brother has a new Theory of Everything.
>Revolutionizing our basic conceptions of time, space, and matter are
>easy, and doesn't require any math.

So it seems.

> Unlike materials or optics or something.
>
That would be work, something for the grunts to do:-) Nobility
doesn't dirty its hands in practical matters, right:-)

Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | chances are he is doing just the same"
.