Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: Timo Nieminen <uqtniemi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 17:02:52 +1000
On Sun, 22 May 2005, Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
<mmeron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:glhansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Gregory L. Hansen) writes:
I've never been very good with thick crystals. But they do give some illuminating demonstrations of the wave nature of particles, like Pendulloesung interference and anamolous absorption.
Yes, these are fascinating. As for "being good with this", well, the theory is both highly technical and not especially glamorous, the only ones good with it are those who need it.
I know from reading sci.physics which parts are glamorous. Everybody and his brother has a new Theory of Everything. Revolutionizing our basic conceptions of time, space, and matter are easy, and doesn't require any math. Unlike materials or optics or something.
Hey, that's a bit unfair on optics! Why, some optics is so simple that you don't need any maths at all, you just need to draw pictures! The really fun part is that this brand of optics (paraxial thin-lens ray optics) is all that most people ever need. Bizarrely, the useful part of optics is actually the easy part of optics.
-- Timo .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: mmeron
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- References:
- Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: mmeron
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: mmeron
- Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- Prev by Date: Resonance in a damped, driven oscillator
- Next by Date: Re: Double Slit Experiment Kit
- Previous by thread: Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- Next by thread: Re: Meanwhile, back in the lab...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|