Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: "yt56erd" <yt56erd@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 May 2005 08:44:40 -0700
Nick wrote:
> No that means that times motion is faster than matter's;
> the speed of light to be precise.
> You can catch up to light/time by accelerating in space.
> This is relativity.
>
> Catch up to time and it goes slower and space shrinks!
gibberish dick.
i see a pattern here. you start with an off the wall, random idea and
then ignore all attempts to educate you and generate what is total and
utter gibberish. once you have done this you demand others prove you
wrong. fantastic.
how can you catch up to time by accelerating? acceleration is a
function of time. if you knew even basic math you could spot the error
of your ways. sadly you dont, so you dont...........
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Nick
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- References:
- Is History recorded by nature?
- From: softwarelabus
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Traveler
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Nick
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: softwarelabus
- Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- From: Nick
- Is History recorded by nature?
- Prev by Date: Re: The worst junk
- Next by Date: Re: GRAVITATION IS NOT A FORCE
- Previous by thread: Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- Next by thread: Re: Is History recorded by nature?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|