sci.physics

• Date Index

---

• Re: building of ITER in France; rationale for ITER compared to JET, Rene Tschaggelar
• is everything quantumly entangled?, mudpuppy
• space/time theory community, Wesley Henwood
• E=MC2 100 yo today!, ttdaomd
• Re: Ontology, Bob (this one)
• The fucking of USA through a peculiar angle :-), Maleki
• A New Site, Jeffrey Spicer
  • Re: A New Site, Uncle Al
  • Re: A New Site, T Wake
• geometric variation, time
  • Re: geometric variation, Sam Wormley
    • Re: geometric variation, time
  • Re: geometric variation, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: geometric variation, Old Man
    • Re: geometric variation, Andy Resnick
• Re: Question - Embedded Spaces yer a dumbass, tj Frazir
• two questions on the bend of the space, dra2710
  • Re: two questions on the bend of the space, Y.Porat
  • Re: two questions on the bend of the space, Zigoteau
    • Re: two questions on the bend of the space, Zigoteau
      • Re: two questions on the bend of the space, Ken S. Tucker
  • Re: two questions on the bend of the space, Sam Wormley
• Intrinsic redshift, tired light., John Sefton
  • Re: Intrinsic redshift, tired light., jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Intrinsic redshift, tired light., Bjoern Feuerbacher
• A Small Applied Relation- A Parody, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A Small Applied Relation- A Parody, Uncle Al
• Re: More proof planet is burning up, tj Frazir
  • Re: More proof planet is burning up, T Wake
    • Re: More proof planet is burning up 190 M³ ?? 1 bb, tj Frazir
  • Re: More proof planet is burning up 190 million square 6 billion, tj Frazir
• Re: Deep_Thoughts., tj Frazir
  • Re: Deep_Thoughts., T Wake
    • Re: Deep_Thoughts., bz
      • Re: Deep_Thoughts., tj Frazir
      • Re: Deep_Thoughts., bz
      • Re: Deep_Thoughts., T Wake
• Re: First 500 megawatt nuclear fusion reactor for France, tj Frazir
  • Re: First 500 megawatt nuclear fusion reactor for France, T Wake
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 735 June 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley
• For your meagre records :-), Maleki
  • Re: For your meagre records :-), Uncle Al
    • Re: For your meagre records :-), Maleki
• Nonconformist College Teaching 2 - Interrelate Different Chapters, OsherD
• Nonconformist College Teaching: Interrelate Different Chapters, OsherD
  • Re: Nonconformist College Teaching: Interrelate Different Chapters, Uncle Al
• sick differentiation, Dobri Karagorgov
  • Re: sick differentiation, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: sick differentiation, Uncle Al
• Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?, Rebmun
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?, Uncle Al
• Unusual scientific toy, Skycloud
  • Re: Unusual scientific toy, Uncle Al
    • Re: Unusual scientific toy, Skycloud
  • Re: Unusual scientific toy, Maleki
• 9/11 and biowarfare as population control, Nomen Nescio
• Europe beats Japan to ITER prize, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Europe beats Japan to ITER prize, Maleki
• Questions for those who've read Einstein's photoelectric effect paper., cool_cat
• Angular momentum and magnetic field, jonathanthio
  • Re: Angular momentum and magnetic field, Uncle Al
  • Re: Angular momentum and magnetic field, Old Man
• Re: Why Rocks Are Hard., tj Frazir
• Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, newedana
  • Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, Andy Resnick
    • Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, newedana
    • Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, newedana
    • Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?, newedana
• Re: 'Force Field' Could Keep Lunar Astronauts Safe From Solar Radiation, Uncle Al
• difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, dcurio
  • Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, Uncle Al
  • Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, srp
    • Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, FrediFizzx
      • Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, srp
  • Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, Sam Wormley
  • Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law, Old Man
• Macho's/ Dark matter, Piet den Dulk
  • Re: Macho's/ Dark matter, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Macho's/ Dark matter, Piet den Dulk
  • Re: Macho's/ Dark matter, Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: Macho's/ Dark matter, Piet den Dulk
• Osher Doctorow vs Uncle Al and Chris Hillman (in Absentia), OsherD
  • Re: Osher Doctorow vs Uncle Al and Chris Hillman (in Absentia), Uncle Al
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 13: Raychaudhuri part 3, OsherD
• Re: SOLAR SAIL AND THE PHOTON, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SOLAR SAIL AND THE PHOTON, The Ghost In The Machine
• Black holes and red shift, john_ramsden
  • Re: Black holes and red shift, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Black holes and red shift, john_ramsden
  • Re: Black holes and red shift, Uncle Al
    • Re: Black holes and red shift, john_ramsden
  • Re: Black holes and red shift, Nick
    • Re: Black holes and red shift, Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: Black holes and red shift, T Wake
      • Re: Black holes and red shift, john_ramsden
      • Re: Black holes and red shift, john_ramsden
• The Flaw in High Energy Physics, Rebmun
  • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics, Uncle Al
• France gets nuclear *fusion* plant, Zoom
  • Re: France gets nuclear *fusion* plant, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: France gets nuclear *fusion* plant, Y.Porat
• Who are scientists?, Raivein
  • Re: Who are scientists?, CWatters
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Zigoteau
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Andy Resnick
  • Re: Who are scientists?, CWatters
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Who are scientists?, none
    • Re: Who are scientists?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Who are scientists?, T Wake
      • The secret of the dance..., Jeff_Relf
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Timo Nieminen
    • Re: Who are scientists?, Raivein
  • Re: Who are scientists?, carlip-nospam
    • Re: Who are scientists?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Who are scientists?, T Wake
      • Re: Who are scientists?, tj Frazir
      • Re: Who are scientists?, T Wake
  • Re: Who are scientists?, Maleki
    • Re: Who are scientists?, tj Frazir
• New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I, BaruchSpinoza
  • Re: New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I, Uncle Al
  • Re: New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I, Paul Cardinale
• Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, mmeron
    • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, mmeron
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, mmeron
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, mmeron
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, Gregory L. Hansen
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, mmeron
      • Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons, richard miller
• Measuring Our Absolute Velocity, Rebmun
  • Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity, The Ghost In The Machine
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 27, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• kinetic energy anomaly?, peter
  • Re: kinetic energy anomaly?, DanHak
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: kinetic energy anomaly?, DanHak
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c, tj Frazir
  • Re: OWLS is not equal to c, T Wake
• A Single Relation Theory- Light Space, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space, T Wake
  • Re: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space, Uncle Al
• Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?, Dr Al E . Cat
  • Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?, Rene Tschaggelar
    • Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?, Rene Tschaggelar
  • Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?, tadchem
• Hypothetical anti-matter question, paul
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, CWatters
    • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, paul
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, Old Man
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, Uncle Al
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, Raivein
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, mmeron
  • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, Nick
    • Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question, T Wake
• Re: Ether Abandoned!, Martin
• quantum entanglement and decoherence, mudpuppy
  • Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence, Old Man
    • Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence, mudpuppy
      • Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence, Old Man
  • Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence, Mike
• Communicating at Translight Velocities, Ssel
  • Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities, Uncle Al
• The most generalized field equation, lugita15
  • Re: The most generalized field equation, Old Man
    • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, Old Man
  • Re: The most generalized field equation, markwh04
    • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, lugita15
      • Re: The most generalized field equation, shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 12: More Raychaudhuri, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 12: More Raychaudhuri, OsherD
    • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 12: More Raychaudhuri, OsherD
• lights twinkle, john
  • Re: lights twinkle, Sam Wormley
  • Re: lights twinkle, jimp
• Happy Kook Day, Jack Sarfatti!, garrison
• Satellite PA system, James Midolo
  • Re: Satellite PA system, Uncle Al
    • Re: Satellite PA system, panteltje
  • Re: Satellite PA system, Old Man
    • Re: Satellite PA system, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Satellite PA system, Old Man
      • Re: Satellite PA system, tadchem
      • Re: Satellite PA system, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Satellite PA system, Old Man
      • Re: Satellite PA system, Old Man
• Free talk radio, George Orwell
  • Re: Free talk radio, Old Man
• Re: Thanks T.J., tj Frazir
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Thanks T.J., tj Frazir
    • Re: Thanks T.J., T Wake
• Re: NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award, cnctut
• Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Jim Black
  • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Morituri-|-Max
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Jim Black
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Jim Black
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Kac Demetrie
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, Jim Black
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, mmeron
    • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, richard miller
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, tj Frazir
      • Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005, T Wake
• HELP: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, Old Man
    • Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, Old Man
      • Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, Old Man
      • Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii, FrediFizzx
• How does this end?, Gagan
  • Re: How does this end?, Old Man
• Accretion discs different matter., John Sefton
  • Re: Accretion discs different matter., Uncle Al
    • Re: Accretion discs different matter., John Sefton
• Plus/minus square roots?, evolnet . regular
  • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, mjb
      • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, CWatters
  • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Richard Henry
    • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, T Wake
  • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Y.Porat
• The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics, Rettel
  • Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics, Uncle Al
  • Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics, Y.Porat
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 11: More Raychaudhuri, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 11: More Raychaudhuri, OsherD
    • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 11: More Raychaudhuri, markwh04
• Magic Squares of Squares, Sam Wormley
• theory of everything, Paul
  • Re: theory of everything, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: theory of everything, CWatters
  • Re: theory of everything, Uncle Al
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 10: Raychaudhuri Again, OsherD
• Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed, p6
  • Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed, Uncle Al
    • Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed, p6
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9, OsherD
    • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9, OsherD
• Re: drive 500 miles per gallon of gasoline cars, tj Frazir
  • Re: drive 500 miles per gallon of gasoline cars, T Wake
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8, OsherD
    • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8, OsherD
• question on STR and QM, Vibhu
  • Re: question on STR and QM, Old Man
  • Re: question on STR and QM, Jim Black
  • Re: question on STR and QM, Uncle Al
    • Re: question on STR and QM, richard miller
  • Re: question on STR and QM, Gregory L. Hansen
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 7, OsherD
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Jun 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• Vacuum scenario..., Externet
  • Re: Vacuum scenario..., John Popelish
  • Re: Vacuum scenario..., Old Man
• Re: General Relativity Examined, Sam Wormley
• Using phasing to explore reality, Nomen Nescio
  • Re: Using phasing to explore reality, Puppet_Sock
• About reality, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c DUMBASSES, tj Frazir
  • Re: OWLS is not equal to c DUMBASSES, bz
    • Re: OWLS is not equal to c DUMBASSES, tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld, T Wake
      • Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld, tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld, Silver Surfer
      • Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld, tj Frazir
      • Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld, T Wake
      • Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld, Silver Surfer
• Re: Fred_Hall is f_cking around with live sperm., tj Frazir
  • Re: Fred_Hall is f_cking around with live sperm., Mark Martin
  • Re: Fred_Hall is f_cking around with live sperm., T Wake
• Time and Matter Theory, Wesley Henwood
  • Re: Time and Matter Theory, tadchem
  • Re: Time and Matter Theory, tj Frazir
    • Re: Time and Matter Theory, tadchem
    • Re: Time and Matter Theory, T Wake
  • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Uncle Al
    • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Traveler
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Uncle Al
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Traveler
  • Re: Time and Matter Theory, J. Horta
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Time and Matter Theory, Wesley Henwood
    • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Wesley Henwood
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Wesley Henwood
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Uncle Al
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Wesley Henwood
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, T Wake
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Uncle Al
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Traveler
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Uncle Al
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Traveler
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Wesley Henwood
      • Re: Time and Matter Theory, John Sefton
    • Re: Time and Matter Theory, Uncle Al
• Filmmakers rather than physicists, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Filmmakers rather than physicists, Richard Henry
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 6, OsherD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 6, OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 5, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 5, OsherD
• New limits for exotic molecules, Sam Wormley
  • Re: New limits for exotic molecules, Uncle Al
• Black Hole Constant, Old Man
  • Re: Black Hole Constant, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Black Hole Constant, Nick
      • Re: Black Hole Constant, T Wake
  • Re: Black Hole Constant, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Black Hole Constant, John C . Polasek
• Phonon & Plasmon References, Robb McLeod
• 12D Gyroverse Model - does this make sense?, p6
  • Re: 12D Gyroverse Model - does this make sense?, Uncle Al
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4, OsherD
    • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4, OsherD
• Contemporary consideration of Equatorial bulge, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Contemporary consideration of Equatorial bulge, John Sefton
    • Re: Contemporary consideration of Equatorial bulge, geraldkelleher
• Anti-Clock wise, dhruveenews@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Anti-Clock wise, OG
    • Re: Anti-Clock wise, tadchem
      • Message not available
      • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Richard Henry
  • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Paul Cardinale
    • Re: Anti-Clock wise, T Wake
      • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: Anti-Clock wise, tadchem
  • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Boris Mohar
  • Re: Anti-Clock wise, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Anti-Clock wise, Jan Panteltje
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, mmeron
  • Message not available
    • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Traveler
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Traveler
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Traveler
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Message not available
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, Lefty
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, tj Frazir
      • Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds, T Wake
• Limitation of wavelength, Thomas Magma
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Thomas Magma
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Jim Black
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Thomas Magma
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Uncle Al
    • Re: Limitation of wavelength, mmeron
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Uncle Al
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, mmeron
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Uncle Al
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Maleki
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Uncle Al
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, mmeron
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Uncle Al
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, mmeron
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Y.Porat
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Y.Porat
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, tj Frazir
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, T Wake
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Paul Cardinale
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Nick
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, curiousjohn4
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Jan Panteltje
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, curiousjohn4
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, mmeron
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Old Man
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, curiousjohn4
    • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Lefty
  • Re: Limitation of wavelength, Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Limitation of wavelength, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Limitation of wavelength, curiousjohn4
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, srp
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, curiousjohn4
      • Re: Limitation of wavelength, srp
• Parity and charge - similarities and differences, Tim Tyler
  • Re: Parity and charge - similarities and differences, Uncle Al
  • Re: Parity and charge - similarities and differences, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Parity and charge - similarities and differences, Old Man
• Coaxing That Pesky Little Ice Cube, Mitch Perkins
• Re: THE SOLAR SAIL DEFINES THE PHOTON, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: THE SOLAR SAIL DEFINES THE PHOTON, Sam Wormley
  • Re: THE SOLAR SAIL DEFINES THE PHOTON, Old Man
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3, OsherD
    • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3, OsherD
      • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3, OsherD
• Is There a Force of Gravity?, Pohs
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?, Kac Demetrie
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?, Traveler
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?, Jan Panteltje
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?, Sam Wormley
• when did chapter problems become popular?, wisc_galoot
  • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, Kack Domoco
    • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, Mark Martin
      • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, Maleki
  • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, CWatters
    • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, Maleki
  • Re: when did chapter problems become popular?, Uncle Al
• Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy, OsherD
  • Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy, OsherD
    • Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy, OsherD
      • Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy, OsherD
  • Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy, Uncle Al
  • Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy, OsherD
• Is Renormalization Re-normalized?, p6
  • Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?, Schoenfeld
      • Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
      • Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?, Schoenfeld
      • Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 2, OsherD
  • Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 2, OsherD
• Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Steven Sesselmann
  • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Richard Tobin
    • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Y.Porat
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity BUSTED, tj Frazir
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity BUSTED, T Wake
    • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Y.Porat
  • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Uncle Al
    • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, mmeron
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Y.Porat
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, tj Frazir
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, T Wake
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, yt56erd
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, tadchem
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, tadchem
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, tj Frazir
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, T Wake
  • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Old Man
    • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, tadchem
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Sesselmann
  • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Nick
  • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, tj Frazir
    • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, Mark Martin
    • Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity, T Wake
• Re: the ether paradocs, Morituri-|-Max
  • Re: the ether paradocs, T Wake
• Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Ken Oath
  • Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Josef Matz
    • Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Andy Resnick
  • Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Andy Resnick
  • Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Jim Black
  • Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?, Zigoteau
• Time in physics, Orion
  • Re: Time in physics, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Time in physics, Traveler
      • Re: Time in physics, Kac Demetrie
      • Re: Time in physics, Traveler
      • Re: Time in physics, tadchem
      • Re: Time in physics, T Wake
      • Re: Time in physics, Traveler
      • Re: Time in physics, Llanzlan Klazmon
      • Re: Time in physics, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Time in physics, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Time in physics, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Time in physics, Traveler
    • Re: Time in physics, Kac Demetrie
      • Re: Time in physics, Traveler
      • Re: Time in physics, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Time in physics, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Time in physics, Uncle Al
    • Re: Time in physics, Traveler
  • Re: Time in physics, Nick
  • Re: Time in physics, TomGee
    • Re: Time in physics, Orion
      • Re: Time in physics, Lefty
      • Re: Time in physics, Ken Oath
      • Re: Time in physics, Orion
• Fundamental problem of science education, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Fundamental problem of science education, Orion
    • Re: Fundamental problem of science education, tadchem
  • Re: Fundamental problem of science education, Uncle Al
    • Re: Fundamental problem of science education, p6
  • Re: Fundamental problem of science education, jimp
• Cosmic Self-Censorship, OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction, OsherD
• Vortices seen in Fermi gas (Jun 22), Sam Wormley
  • Re: Vortices seen in Fermi gas (Jun 22), OsherD
• Jack Kilby: 1923--2005 (Jun 22), Sam Wormley
  • Re: Jack Kilby: 1923--2005 (Jun 22), Uncle Al
• Photon Field Strength II, Old Man
  • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Schoenfeld
    • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Old Man
    • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Y.Porat
  • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Jim Black
  • Re: Photon Field Strength II, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
  • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Y.Porat
  • Re: Photon Field Strength II, srp
    • Re: Photon Field Strength II, Y.Porat
• Griffiths: QM Solution Manual?, Tanja Wendt
  • Re: Griffiths: QM Solution Manual?, Tanja Wendt
    • Re: Griffiths: QM Solution Manual?, Andy Resnick
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 734 June 22, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, Sam Wormley
• Dark Energy Creates Quasars, John Sefton
• Question on Dimension Analysis, Gert-Jan
• The Error in Relativistic Physics, Pot
  • Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics, Uncle Al
• US-NJ-Imaging Physicist, Kolya
• Physicist cures cancer, Astucias (Spain)
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, Rene Tschaggelar
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, Mark Martin
    • Re: Physicist cures cancer, CWatters
      • Re: Physicist cures cancer, CWatters
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, tadchem
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, Maleki
  • Re: Physicist cures cancer, Zigoteau
• thermodinamics identities, stefjnoskynov
  • Re: thermodinamics identities, Astucias (Spain)
  • Re: thermodinamics identities, Maleki
• Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI, OsherD
  • Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI, OsherD
    • Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI, OsherD
      • Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI, John Sefton
      • Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI, OsherD
• Reflections from a Feather, Old Man
  • Re: Reflections from a Feather, CWatters
    • Re: Reflections from a Feather, mountain man
  • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Schoenfeld
  • Re: Reflections from a Feather, G=EMC^2 Glazier
    • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Reflections from a Feather, G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: Reflections from a Feather, tadchem
  • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Mark Martin
    • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Sam Wormley
      • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Mark Martin
  • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Maleki
    • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Old Man
      • Re: Reflections from a Feather, Maleki
• Re: Sci.Physics in a nutshell., Uncle Al
  • I've never seen 8.5" x 11" Green Bar, has Uncle_Al ?, Jeff_Relf
    • Re: I've never seen 8.5" x 11" Green Bar, has Uncle_Al ?, Uncle Al
• Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
  • Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
    • Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
      • Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
      • Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
      • Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
      • Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood, OsherD
• Mathforge.net :: FermiLab, Escultura, Twin Primes and the Deadly Rooms of Death, jkauzlar
• alpha * omega / c, Garry Denke
  • Re: alpha * omega / c, Uncle Al
    • Re: alpha * omega / c, GarryDenke
• Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!, Quantum Mirror
  • Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!, Andy Resnick
  • Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!, TomGee
  • Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!, Uncle Al
    • Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!, Uncle Al
• Re: The Einstein Hoax, Sam Wormley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Einstein Hoax, Uncle Al
• sucking gravity, Dobri Karagorgov
  • Re: sucking gravity, Morituri-|-Max
    • Re: sucking gravity, tadchem
      • Re: sucking gravity, T Wake
  • Re: sucking gravity, Uncle Al
• Re: You Will See the Consequences of Your Actions, Timo Nieminen
• How a Photon Waves, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• New Physics Theory, Don
  • Re: New Physics Theory, John Sefton
  • Re: New Physics Theory, Morituri-|-Max
  • Re: New Physics Theory, Uncle Al
• Science and dishonesty, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Science and dishonesty, Uncle Al
    • Re: Science and dishonesty, Traveler
  • Re: Science and dishonesty, Y.Porat
• Sunset at Old Man's Place, Old Man
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, mmeron
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, geraldkelleher
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Mark Martin
      • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Mark Martin
      • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, geraldkelleher
      • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Mark Martin
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Uncle Al
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, tadchem
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Schoenfeld
      • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, panteltje
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Mark Martin
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, richard miller
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Uncle Al
    • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Old Man
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
  • Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, Dr StrangeLove
    • Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, Maleki
      • Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, panteltje
      • Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, Maleki
      • Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, Ken Muldrew
    • Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, Maleki
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, curiousjohn4
  • Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place, curiousjohn4
• accretion discs, John Sefton
  • Re: accretion discs, Sam Wormley
    • Re: accretion discs, John Sefton
      • Re: accretion discs, John Sefton
      • Re: accretion discs, Uncle Al
      • Re: accretion discs, Uncle Al
  • Re: accretion discs, Uncle Al
• Strange turn for protons, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Strange turn for protons, Y.Porat
• An Inference as the Form of the Logic, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: An Inference as the Form of the Logic, Uncle Al
• Best water wicking material?, Bruce W.1
  • Re: Best water wicking material?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Best water wicking material?, Bruce W.1
      • Re: Best water wicking material?, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Best water wicking material?, Jan Panteltje
    • Re: Best water wicking material?, Dr Al E . Cat
  • Re: Best water wicking material?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Best water wicking material?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Message not available
      • Re: Best water wicking material?, Uncle Al
      • Message not available
      • Re: Best water wicking material?, tadchem
      • Message not available
      • Re: Best water wicking material?, Uncle Al
  • Re: Best water wicking material?, Richard Henry
  • Re: Best water wicking material?, tadchem
  • Re: Best water wicking material?, Uncle Al
    • Re: Best water wicking material?, Bruce W.1
      • Re: Best water wicking material?, Uncle Al
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Best water wicking material?, G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Dr. Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2, Otohp
  • Re: Dr. Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Dr. Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2, Uncle Al
• Symmetry and conservation, daniel
  • Re: Symmetry and conservation, Uncle Al
    • Re: Symmetry and conservation, Schoenfeld
      • Re: Symmetry and conservation, Uncle Al
  • Re: Symmetry and conservation, dedanoe
• 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
  • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Puppet_Sock
    • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Puppet_Sock
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Puppet_Sock
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Puppet_Sock
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Puppet_Sock
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Puppet_Sock
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
      • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
  • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., John C . Polasek
    • Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations., Golden Boar
• Gravity and electricity, Orion
  • Re: Gravity and electricity, Traveler
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, John Sefton
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Traveler
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Traveler
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, Orion
  • Re: Gravity and electricity, Puppet_Sock
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, John Sefton
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, John Sefton
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Orion
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, John Sefton
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, John Sefton
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Orion
      • Re: Gravity and electricity Both created by motion, G=EMC^2 Glazier
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Puppet_Sock
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, tj Frazir
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, T Wake
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Orion
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, hanson
  • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, Traveler
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Traveler
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, hanson
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Gravity and electricity, dedanoe
    • Re: Gravity and electricity, Uncle Al
  • Re: Gravity and electricity, Mark Fergerson
• Metal springs at low temperatures, Vosoni
  • Re: Metal springs at low temperatures, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Metal springs at low temperatures, hanson
      • Re: Metal springs at low temperatures, tadchem
      • Re: Metal springs at low temperatures, Vosoni
• Relativistic Complex Analysis, tontoko
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 20, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• What does Planck's constant really mean?, franklinhu
  • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Cheeks
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Orion
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Puppet_Sock
    • Message not available
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, franklinhu
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, franklinhu
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, franklinhu
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, franklinhu
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Bjoern Feuerbacher
  • Message not available
    • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Y.Porat
      • Message not available
      • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Y.Porat
  • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Y.Porat
  • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Golden Boar
    • Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?, Golden Boar
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, bryant_j_j
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, tj Frazir
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, T Wake
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, tj Frazir
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, T Wake
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, T Wake
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens, tj Frazir
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens, T Wake
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens, tj Frazir
      • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens, T Wake
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, tj Frazir
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, T Wake
  • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, tj Frazir
    • Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN, T Wake
• How to identify cluster wrapping with periodic boundary condition?, halfsearch2
• Infrared Echo of a Magnetar Burst?, Sam Wormley
• A Living Space-Time..., p6
  • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Uncle Al
    • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Lefty
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., p6
    • Re: A Living Space-Time..., G=EMC^2 Glazier
  • Re: A Living Space-Time..., macromitch
    • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Morituri-|-Max
    • Re: A Living Space-Time..., p6
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., macromitch
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., p6
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., kenseto
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., T Wake
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Orion
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., kenseto
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., macromitch
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., T Wake
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., macromitch
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., T Wake
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., kenseto
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Morituri-|-Max
      • Re: A Living Space-Time..., kenseto
  • Re: A Living Space-Time..., Morituri-|-Max
• A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic, Douglas Eagleson
  • Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic, Uncle Al
    • Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic, Douglas Eagleson
• Re: mathematician salaries, Timo Nieminen
  • Re: mathematician salaries, Gregory L. Hansen
• constant velocity, Dobri Karagorgov
  • Re: constant velocity, Old Man
• energy, force and distance - deeply confusing, Dobri Karagorgov
  • Message not available
    • Re: energy, force and distance - deeply confusing, Dobri Karagorgov
• Unification At A Point or Little String 2, OsherD
  • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String 2, OsherD
  • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String 2, Dobri Karagorgov
    • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String 2, OsherD
• Unification At A Point or Little String, OsherD
  • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String, OsherD
  • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String, macromitch
    • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String, OsherD
      • Re: Unification At A Point or Little String, OsherD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Unification At A Point or Little String, OsherD
• EM is an accelerating H field ??, curiousjohn4
  • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, curiousjohn4
  • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, curiousjohn4
  • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, operator jay
    • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, curiousjohn4
      • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, Old Man
  • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, Old Man
    • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, curiousjohn4
      • Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??, Old Man
• Does light speed really slow down in a medium?, Nick
  • Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?, Greysky
    • Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?, macromitch
      • Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?, Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
      • Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?, Morituri-|-Max
  • Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?, newedana
• Tired of being constant harassed with SPOG -- relax and enjoy Anti-SPOG, bryant_j_j
• Photon Field Strengrh, Old Man
  • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Rene Tschaggelar
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Old Man
  • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, markwh04
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Old Man
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Timo Nieminen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, FrediFizzx
    • Message not available
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Timo Nieminen
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Old Man
  • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, FrediFizzx
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Old Man
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Old Man
      • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, FrediFizzx
  • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Gregory L. Hansen
    • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Gregory L. Hansen
  • Re: Photon Field Strengrh, Y.Porat
• help with nitrogen configuration, stefjnoskynov
  • Re: help with nitrogen configuration, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: help with nitrogen configuration, Uncle Al
  • Re: help with nitrogen configuration, Sam Wormley
  • Re: help with nitrogen configuration, Y.Porat
• meteoquake.org "cloud-fault" relation in new What is meteoquake link?, None
• Click Trick, Platopes
• The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity, Kcab
  • Re: The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity, Sam Wormley
  • Re: The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity, Uncle Al
• American Antigravity, tventura6
  • Re: American Antigravity, Uncle Al
    • Re: American Antigravity, John Sefton
• Vindication of Wallace's words, Pentcho Valev
  • Re: Vindication of Wallace's words, geraldkelleher
  • Re: Vindication of Wallace's words, Old Man
    • Re: Vindication of Wallace's words, Timo Nieminen
• A logic puzzle craze puts the spotlight on Latin squares, Sam Wormley
  • Re: A logic puzzle craze puts the spotlight on Latin squares, Dirk Van de moortel
• Pieces of Numbers, Sam Wormley
• Astronomers have found the closest known cousin to Earth, Sam Wormley
• Superconducting nanowires pulse to a new beat, Sam Wormley
  • Re: Superconducting nanowires pulse to a new beat, Uncle Al
• Physicists in the US have demonstrated a simple way to entangle "qudits", Sam Wormley
• a lonely hydrogen atom, yadu
  • Re: a lonely hydrogen atom, Bam
  • Re: a lonely hydrogen atom, Uncle Al
• Just thought I should give you guys a heads up, Jack Martinelli
  • Re: Just thought I should give you guys a heads up, Mitchell Jones
  • Re: Just thought I should give you guys a heads up, Uncle Al
  • Re: Just thought I should give you guys a heads up, Schoenfeld
• Now this one I didn't know :-), Maleki
  • Re: Now this one I didn't know :-), Uncle Al
    • Re: Now this one I didn't know :-), Maleki
• Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?, Old Man
  • Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?, Timo Nieminen
  • Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?, Zigoteau
    • Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?, Old Man
      • Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?, Zigoteau
• Re: e=[(hbar^2)e0/u0]^1/4 ; hbar=[(e^4)u0/e0]^1/2, John C . Polasek
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, Sam Wormley
  • Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/, tj Frazir
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Jun 05 Washington, DC, Sam Wormley
• For Sale - Landolt Bornstein 6th Edition, Radra
  • Re: For Sale - Landolt Bornstein 6th Edition, T Wake
• FACTUAL INFORMATION RE: DENBURY RESOURCES INC (NYSE: DNR) REPORTED TO FBI, Qtvc
• THEORY OF IRAQI CONCEALMENT OF CBW EVIDENCE UTILIZING MOBILE PPV UNITS, Qtvc
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • THEORY OF IRAQI CONCEALMENT OF CBW EVIDENCE UTILIZING MOBILE PPV UNITS, Qtvc
• Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks 2, OsherD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks 2, OsherD
• Equivalence of Shankar's and Liboff's definition of the density matrix, Gordon Freeman
  • Re: Equivalence of Shankar's and Liboff's definition of the density matrix, George Jones
• Perceived rate of time, padremo
  • Re: Perceived rate of time, Sam Wormley
    • Re: Perceived rate of time, padremo
  • Re: Perceived rate of time, Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What's your maximum G-load?, cnctut
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What's your maximum G-load?, cnctut
  • Re: What's your maximum G-load?, Rene Tschaggelar
• The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity, Dem
  • Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity, Sam Wormley
    • Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity, geraldkelleher
  • Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity, Uncle Al
    • Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity, OsherD
      • Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity, markwh04
• Photons converting to Electron-Positron, p6
  • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, tadchem
    • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, Jeff
  • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, John Sefton
  • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, Uncle Al
    • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, John Sefton
  • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, srp
    • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, p6
      • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, p6
      • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, FrediFizzx
      • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, srp
      • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, Y.Porat
      • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, srp
  • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, John C . Polasek
  • Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron, Ken Oath
• things, Jevan
  • Re: things, Uncle Al
    • Re: things, John Sefton
  • Re: things, Schoenfeld
  • Re: things, Mitch Perkins
• First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Jay R. Yablon
  • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement", Bjoern Feuerbacher
    • Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Co