sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: building of ITER in France; rationale for ITER compared to JET
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• is everything quantumly entangled?
  • From: mudpuppy
• space/time theory community
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: geometric variation
  • From: Andy Resnick
• E=MC2 100 yo today!
  • From: ttdaomd
• Re: A New Site
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A New Site
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: geometric variation
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Ontology
  • From: Bob (this one)
• Re: two questions on the bend of the space
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• The fucking of USA through a peculiar angle :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: geometric variation
  • From: time
• Re: geometric variation
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: More proof planet is burning up 190 M³ ?? 1 bb
  • From: tj Frazir
• A New Site
  • From: Jeffrey Spicer
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: More proof planet is burning up 190 million square 6 billion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: geometric variation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• geometric variation
  • From: time
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Question - Embedded Spaces yer a dumbass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Maarten van Reeuwijk
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Griffiths: QM Solution Manual?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Europe beats Japan to ITER prize
  • From: Maleki
• Re: two questions on the bend of the space
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Unusual scientific toy
  • From: Maleki
• Re: two questions on the bend of the space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: Rebmun
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: For your meagre records :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: More proof planet is burning up
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Deep_Thoughts.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: two questions on the bend of the space
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: two questions on the bend of the space
  • From: Y.Porat
• two questions on the bend of the space
  • From: dra2710
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Intrinsic redshift, tired light.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Intrinsic redshift, tired light.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Deep_Thoughts.
  • From: bz
• Re: Punching
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: Punching
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Deep_Thoughts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A Small Applied Relation- A Parody
  • From: Uncle Al
• Intrinsic redshift, tired light.
  • From: John Sefton
• A Small Applied Relation- A Parody
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: More proof planet is burning up
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• The secret of the dance...
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Deep_Thoughts.
  • From: bz
• Re: Deep_Thoughts.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: First 500 megawatt nuclear fusion reactor for France
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Deep_Thoughts.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: For your meagre records :-)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: First 500 megawatt nuclear fusion reactor for France
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Unusual scientific toy
  • From: Skycloud
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 735 June 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• For your meagre records :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Nonconformist College Teaching: Interrelate Different Chapters
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sick differentiation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Griffiths: QM Solution Manual?
  • From: Tanja Wendt
• Re: Unusual scientific toy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Nonconformist College Teaching 2 - Interrelate Different Chapters
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Angular momentum and magnetic field
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Angular momentum and magnetic field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Nonconformist College Teaching: Interrelate Different Chapters
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: srp
• Re: Macho's/ Dark matter
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: A SIMPLE QST BUT REALLY SCI.PHY
  • From: kuttu
• Re: sick differentiation
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: john_ramsden
• sick differentiation
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Relativistic Physics - Science or Religion?
  • From: Rebmun
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: john_ramsden
• Unusual scientific toy
  • From: Skycloud
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Metal springs at low temperatures
  • From: Vosoni
• Re: Macho's/ Dark matter
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Macho's/ Dark matter
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• 9/11 and biowarfare as population control
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: kinetic energy anomaly?
  • From: DanHak
• Re: kinetic energy anomaly?
  • From: DanHak
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: Nick
• Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: SOLAR SAIL AND THE PHOTON
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Macho's/ Dark matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Europe beats Japan to ITER prize
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Questions for those who've read Einstein's photoelectric effect paper.
  • From: cool_cat
• Angular momentum and magnetic field
  • From: jonathanthio
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Why Rocks Are Hard.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: srp
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: srp
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Raivein
• Re: Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Is Light a Flow of Copuscular Photons?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: none
• Re: 'Force Field' Could Keep Lunar Astronauts Safe From Solar Radiation
  • From: Uncle Al
• difference between coulomb's law and newton's law
  • From: dcurio
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: srp
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Macho's/ Dark matter
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Osher Doctorow vs Uncle Al and Chris Hillman (in Absentia)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Osher Doctorow vs Uncle Al and Chris Hillman (in Absentia)
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 13: Raychaudhuri part 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: SOLAR SAIL AND THE PHOTON
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: Old Man
• Re: question on STR and QM
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: richard miller
• Re: New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Black holes and red shift
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Black holes and red shift
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: The Flaw in High Energy Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: France gets nuclear *fusion* plant
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: tadchem
• The Flaw in High Energy Physics
  • From: Rebmun
• Re: France gets nuclear *fusion* plant
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• France gets nuclear *fusion* plant
  • From: Zoom
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: Silver Surfer
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Who are scientists?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Who are scientists?
  • From: Raivein
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: Raivein
• New theory Proves Mass exists, Part I
  • From: BaruchSpinoza
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: mmeron
• Physicists have set a new record for the acceleration of electrons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: things
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens
  • From: T Wake
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 11: More Raychaudhuri
  • From: markwh04
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF Atoms jeens
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Traveler
• Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence
  • From: mudpuppy
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Accretion discs different matter.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Measuring Our Absolute Velocity
  • From: Rebmun
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: Silver Surfer
• Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld
  • From: Silver Surfer
• Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld
  • From: Silver Surfer
• Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 27, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: Nick
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• kinetic energy anomaly?
  • From: peter
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: Free talk radio
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The most generalized field equation
  • From: Old Man
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence
  • From: Mike
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: panteltje
• Re: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: quantum entanglement and decoherence
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Satellite PA system
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: Old Man
• Re: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: paul
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• A Single Relation Theory- Light Space
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: CWatters
• Will Wearing Personal Nuclear Weapons Give Americans A Better Sense Of Security?
  • From: Dr Al E . Cat
• Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Hypothetical anti-matter question
  • From: paul
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Ether Abandoned!
  • From: Martin
• Re: Communicating at Translight Velocities
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• quantum entanglement and decoherence
  • From: mudpuppy
• Re: lights twinkle
  • From: jimp
• Communicating at Translight Velocities
  • From: Ssel
• The most generalized field equation
  • From: lugita15
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 12: More Raychaudhuri
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 12: More Raychaudhuri
  • From: OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 12: More Raychaudhuri
  • From: OsherD
• Re: lights twinkle
  • From: Sam Wormley
• lights twinkle
  • From: john
• Happy Kook Day, Jack Sarfatti!
  • From: garrison
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Thanks T.J.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld
  • From: T Wake
• Satellite PA system
  • From: James Midolo
• Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Orion
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Free talk radio
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Thanks T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thanks T.J.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Kac Demetrie
• Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: question on STR and QM
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed
  • From: p6
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Ken Oath
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii
  • From: Old Man
• Re: NOMINATION: "Uncle" Alan Schwartz for the Victor von Frankenstein "Weird Science" Award
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: How does this end?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Operation Troll Shoulder -- 25 Jun 2005
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Traveler
• HELP: Need good experimental values for proton and neutron radii
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• How does this end?
  • From: Gagan
• Re: Accretion discs different matter.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: theory of everything
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: question on STR and QM
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: theory of everything
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: Silver Surfer
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Accretion discs different matter.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: mjb
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Plus/minus square roots?
  • From: evolnet . regular
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 11: More Raychaudhuri
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• The Limitations of Mathematics in Physics
  • From: Rettel
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 11: More Raychaudhuri
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Magic Squares of Squares
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: theory of everything
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• theory of everything
  • From: Paul
• Re: drive 500 miles per gallon of gasoline cars
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir lives in his dreamworld
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Orion
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 10: Raychaudhuri Again
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: question on STR and QM
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Y.Porat
• Prove Einstein Thinking is Flawed
  • From: p6
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Vacuum scenario...
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9
  • From: OsherD
• Re: question on STR and QM
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: bz
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9
  • From: OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 9
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: drive 500 miles per gallon of gasoline cars
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c DUMBASSES
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8
  • From: OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 8
  • From: OsherD
• question on STR and QM
  • From: Vibhu
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 7
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: mmeron
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 6
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 24 Jun 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Vacuum scenario...
  • From: John Popelish
• Vacuum scenario...
  • From: Externet
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity BUSTED
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Black Hole Constant
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: T Wake
• Re: General Relativity Examined
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Fred_Hall is f_cking around with live sperm.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: bz
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: T Wake
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Using phasing to explore reality
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Black Hole Constant
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Using phasing to explore reality
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: bz
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Thomas Magma
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c DUMBASSES
  • From: bz
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: J. Horta
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Traveler
• About reality
  • From: Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: Maleki
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: Maleki
• Re: New limits for exotic molecules
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Fred_Hall is f_cking around with live sperm.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: OWLS is not equal to c DUMBASSES
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fred_Hall is f_cking around with live sperm.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity BUSTED
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Evolution of consciousness
  • From: Maleki
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Time and Matter Theory
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Filmmakers rather than physicists
  • From: Richard Henry
• Time and Matter Theory
  • From: Wesley Henwood
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Contemporary consideration of Equatorial bulge
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Black Hole Constant
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sesselmann
• Filmmakers rather than physicists
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Is Renormalization Re-normalized?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Black Hole Constant
  • From: Nick
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 6
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 5
  • From: OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 5
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Black Hole Constant
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Contemporary consideration of Equatorial bulge
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: jimp
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: p6
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• New limits for exotic molecules
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Black Hole Constant
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy
  • From: OsherD
• Phonon & Plasmon References
  • From: Robb McLeod
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: 12D Gyroverse Model - does this make sense?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4
  • From: OsherD
• 12D Gyroverse Model - does this make sense?
  • From: p6
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Nick
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Nick
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Nick
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Old Man
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: THE SOLAR SAIL DEFINES THE PHOTON
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Parity and charge - similarities and differences
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: OG
• Re: Anti-Clock wise
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Thomas Magma
• Contemporary consideration of Equatorial bulge
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Anti-Clock wise
  • From: dhruveenews@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Limitation of wavelength
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Parity and charge - similarities and differences
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: THE SOLAR SAIL DEFINES THE PHOTON
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Limitation of wavelength
  • From: Thomas Magma
• Re: Parity and charge - similarities and differences
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3
  • From: OsherD
• Parity and charge - similarities and differences
  • From: Tim Tyler
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3
  • From: OsherD
• Coaxing That Pesky Little Ice Cube
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: THE SOLAR SAIL DEFINES THE PHOTON
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Jack Kilby: 1923--2005 (Jun 22)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: T Wake
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: srp
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Kac Demetrie
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Kac Demetrie
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Kac Demetrie
• Is There a Force of Gravity?
  • From: Pohs
• Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: Maleki
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: Kack Domoco
• Re: when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• when did chapter problems become popular?
  • From: wisc_galoot
• Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy
  • From: OsherD
• Osher Doctorow vs Chris Hillman (In Abstentia) Controversy
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Is Renormalization Re-normalized?
  • From: p6
• Re: Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Time in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: Zigoteau
• Is radioactive decay affected by gravity
  • From: Steven Sesselmann
• Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: panteltje
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Orion
• Re: Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: the ether paradocs
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Photon electric and magnetic fields vary sinusoidally?
  • From: Ken Oath
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Time in physics
  • From: Orion
• Fundamental problem of science education
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Vortices seen in Fermi gas (Jun 22)
  • From: OsherD
• Cosmic Self-Censorship
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Rotation vs Expansion-Contraction
  • From: OsherD
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Old Man
• Vortices seen in Fermi gas (Jun 22)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Jack Kilby: 1923--2005 (Jun 22)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Photon Field Strength II
  • From: Old Man
• Griffiths: QM Solution Manual?
  • From: Tanja Wendt
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected 2
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Maleki
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 734 June 22, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Maleki
• Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: thermodinamics identities
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Dark Energy Creates Quasars
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI
  • From: John Sefton
• Question on Dimension Analysis
  • From: Gert-Jan
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Error in Relativistic Physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• The Error in Relativistic Physics
  • From: Pot
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Schoenfeld
• US-NJ-Imaging Physicist
  • From: Kolya
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: T Wake
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Sunset at Dr StrangeLove's place
  • From: Dr StrangeLove
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: panteltje
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Physicist cures cancer
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: energy, force and distance - deeply confusing
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Dr Al E . Cat
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Physicist cures cancer
  • From: Astucias (Spain)
• Re: thermodinamics identities
  • From: Astucias (Spain)
• thermodinamics identities
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Reflections from a Feather
  • From: CWatters
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: alpha * omega / c
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Acceleration of Universe Via Rotation and PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: macromitch
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: macromitch
• Reflections from a Feather
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: I've never seen 8.5" x 11" Green Bar, has Uncle_Al ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Schoenfeld
• I've never seen 8.5" x 11" Green Bar, has Uncle_Al ?
  • From: Jeff_Relf
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: GarryDenke
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sci.Physics in a nutshell.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: hbar=e^2u0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Unification From Point To Neighborhood
  • From: OsherD
• Re: alpha * omega / c
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Tim Golden
• Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!
  • From: TomGee
• Mathforge.net :: FermiLab, Escultura, Twin Primes and the Deadly Rooms of Death
  • From: jkauzlar
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sucking gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Traveler
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Science and dishonesty
  • From: Uncle Al
• alpha * omega / c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: accretion discs
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: accretion discs
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: accretion discs
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: richard miller
• Re: Symmetry and conservation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sucking gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Turin Shroud confirmed as a fake!
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: An Inference as the Form of the Logic
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: sucking gravity
  • From: tadchem
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: sucking gravity
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: accretion discs
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Punching
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: The Einstein Hoax
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: accretion discs
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: New Physics Theory
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: jimp
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: tadchem
• sucking gravity
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: You Will See the Consequences of Your Actions
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gravity and electricity Both created by motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• How a Photon Waves
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Orion
• New Physics Theory
  • From: Don
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Science and dishonesty
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: mmeron
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Sunset at Old Man's Place
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Best water wicking material?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Strange turn for protons
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: accretion discs
  • From: Sam Wormley
• accretion discs
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Symmetry and conservation
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Strange turn for protons
  • From: Sam Wormley
• An Inference as the Form of the Logic
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Best water wicking material?
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Orion
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: Dr. Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Orion
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Orion
• Re: Dr. Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Dr. Einstein's Unfortunate Legacy #2
  • From: Otohp
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Symmetry and conservation
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Symmetry and conservation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Metal springs at low temperatures
  • From: tadchem
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: kenseto
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: hanson
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: hanson
• Symmetry and conservation
  • From: daniel
• Re: 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Y.Porat
• 2 Questions about Planck units and equations.
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Metal springs at low temperatures
  • From: hanson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Metal springs at low temperatures
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: kenseto
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Now this one I didn't know :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gravity and electricity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Orion
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Orion
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Cheeks
• PS: Need for a good experimental catalog of baryon and meson radii
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Gravity and electricity
  • From: Orion
• Metal springs at low temperatures
  • From: Vosoni
• Relativistic Complex Analysis
  • From: tontoko
• Re: What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 20, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: p6
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
  • From: Fred Chen
• What does Planck's constant really mean?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
  • From: Fred Chen
• Re: GOD=G_uv PROOF OF INVISIBLE WORLD OF HEAVEN
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
  • From: Fred Chen
• Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
  • From: Fred Chen
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: p6
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Lefty
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: p6
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• How to identify cluster wrapping with periodic boundary condition?
  • From: halfsearch2
• Infrared Echo of a Magnetar Burst?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: jimp
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: macromitch
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: jimp
• Re: A Living Space-Time...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Schoenfeld
• A Living Space-Time...
  • From: p6
• A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Old Man
• Re: mathematician salaries
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: mathematician salaries
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: Old Man
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: Old Man
• Re: constant velocity
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• constant velocity
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String 2
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• energy, force and distance - deeply confusing
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String 2
  • From: OsherD
• Unification At A Point or Little String 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Tom Van Flandern
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String
  • From: OsherD
• Re: help with nitrogen configuration
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Unification At A Point or Little String
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Does light speed really slow down in a medium?
  • From: Greysky
• Unification At A Point or Little String
  • From: OsherD
• Unification At A Point or Little String
  • From: OsherD
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: Nick
• EM is an accelerating H field ??
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Does light speed really slow down in a medium?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Tired of being constant harassed with SPOG -- relax and enjoy Anti-SPOG
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: kdthrge
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: help with nitrogen configuration
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: help with nitrogen configuration
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: help with nitrogen configuration
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: Nick
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Photon Field Strengrh
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: What's your maximum G-load?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• help with nitrogen configuration
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• meteoquake.org "cloud-fault" relation in new What is meteoquake link?
  • From: None
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: American Antigravity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Click Trick
  • From: Platopes
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Hellboy
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: American Antigravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Just thought I should give you guys a heads up
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: things
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Superconducting nanowires pulse to a new beat
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: a lonely hydrogen atom
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Just thought I should give you guys a heads up
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• The Lorentz Transformation for Velocity
  • From: Kcab
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: A logic puzzle craze puts the spotlight on Latin squares
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: srp
• Re: Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: T Wake
• American Antigravity
  • From: tventura6
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Vindication of Wallace's words
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Just thought I should give you guys a heads up
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• A logic puzzle craze puts the spotlight on Latin squares
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Pieces of Numbers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Astronomers have found the closest known cousin to Earth
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Equivalence of Shankar's and Liboff's definition of the density matrix
  • From: George Jones
• Superconducting nanowires pulse to a new beat
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physicists in the US have demonstrated a simple way to entangle "qudits"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: a lonely hydrogen atom
  • From: Bam
• a lonely hydrogen atom
  • From: yadu
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Just thought I should give you guys a heads up
  • From: Jack Martinelli
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Now this one I didn't know :-)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Now this one I didn't know :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Feynman Diagram for Diffraction ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: What's your maximum G-load?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: e=[(hbar^2)e0/u0]^1/4 ; hbar=[(e^4)u0/e0]^1/2
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Rudiment of Effectuationist GUT
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 17 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 17 Jun 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: srp
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: p6
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: Ken Oath
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: For Sale - Landolt Bornstein 6th Edition
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• For Sale - Landolt Bornstein 6th Edition
  • From: Radra
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: p6
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• FACTUAL INFORMATION RE: DENBURY RESOURCES INC (NYSE: DNR) REPORTED TO FBI
  • From: Qtvc
• THEORY OF IRAQI CONCEALMENT OF CBW EVIDENCE UTILIZING MOBILE PPV UNITS
  • From: Qtvc
• THEORY OF IRAQI CONCEALMENT OF CBW EVIDENCE UTILIZING MOBILE PPV UNITS
  • From: Qtvc
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: bz
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: things
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Perceived rate of time
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: tadchem
• Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks 2
  • From: OsherD
• Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks 2
  • From: OsherD
• Equivalence of Shankar's and Liboff's definition of the density matrix
  • From: Gordon Freeman
• Re: Perceived rate of time
  • From: padremo
• Re: Perceived rate of time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Perceived rate of time
  • From: padremo
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: JimboCat
• Re: Punching
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: What's your maximum G-load?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: srp
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: things
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Rudiment of Effectuationist GUT
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Intrinsic redshift.
  • From: John Sefton
• The Conflict Between Quantum Theory and General Relativity
  • From: Dem
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: tadchem
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Tim Golden
• Re: Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Tim Golden
• Photons converting to Electron-Positron
  • From: p6
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: T Wake
• things
  • From: Jevan
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• First publication: "On the Dynamical Origins of QCD Confinement"
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Rigid body dynamics of separating objects
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: mmeron
• Rudiment of Effectuationist GUT
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: James
• Re: Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks
  • From: OsherD
• fourier optics, multi 'slit'
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Local vs Global in Statistical Information Networks
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Rigid body dynamics of separating objects
  • From: wurdcutter
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Intrinsic redshift.
  • From: PD
• Re: Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations
  • From: PD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Background neutrinos join the limelight
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: James
• Re: Rigid body dynamics of separating objects
  • From: PD
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: PD
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Greysky
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Time is an illusion -- mor-ons Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Catch some slow photons?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Rigid body dynamics of separating objects
  • From: wurdcutter
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Photoelectric wavefunction
  • From: qude
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Hellboy
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Hellboy
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: Old Man
• Re: The double slit experiment
  • From: PD
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• The double slit experiment
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: Peter Lowrie
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: p6
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: richard miller
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Since the laws of physics are reversible.
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Lettuce or Bell's Inequallity Explained
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Heisenberg Uncertainty Dissected
  • From: OsherD
• Differential rotation as a geological mechanism
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: *** rD
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: PD
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: geraldkelleher
• Re: Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: hot air and hot water
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: tadchem
• hot air and hot water
  • From: heiack
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Sound wave/air molecules question
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: intelligent levers
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: kk
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: New Forum:Moderated and Best Rated!
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: 2ndPostulateDude
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Since the laws of physics are reversible.
  • From: George Jones
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: 911 physics
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Since the laws of physics are reversible.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• 911 physics
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• 911 physics
  • From: Nomen Nescio
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Pope Benedict's Web Log!!!
  • From: eyesacknootun
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: observers in physics
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: *** rD
• Prugovecki: Reply to Markw of June 13
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Sound wave/air molecules question
  • From: Sonoy
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: *** rD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: Proximity-Geometry To Distance-Geometry As Phase Change
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Nick
• observers in physics
  • From: yadu
• Re: Proximity-Geometry To Distance-Geometry As Phase Change
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Intrinsic redshift.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Nick
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Nick
• Proximity-Geometry To Distance-Geometry As Phase Change
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: Nick
• Calling crankbusters: Crackpot David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Calling crankbusters: cranky David Thomson returns in Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: Isaac Wingfield
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: stopgoblinlittleminds
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Sonoluminescence - anyone got an answer?
  • From: p6
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Time is an illusion -- mor-ons Lynds
  • From: Lefty
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Time is an illusion -- mor-ons Lynds
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Freely Falling Charge: Radiates ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Prove that God does not = G_uv
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Magic" numbers remain magic
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Max Magnetic Field BUSTED crush an atom
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Punching
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: Uncle Al
• "Magic" numbers remain magic
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Freely Falling Charge: Radiates ?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Time is an illusion -- mor-ons Lynds
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: Old Man
• the new chemistry of the levers
  • From: dedanoe
• intelligent levers
  • From: dedanoe
• i know you suck but do you swallow?
  • From: dedanoe
• painful unification
  • From: dedanoe
• waisting my time
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Old Man
• Re: heat capacity of a diatomic gas
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Wavefunction Increases Causation Toward Real Axis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: heat capacity of a diatomic gas
  • From: Robert M . Mazo
• Fish 'n Chips
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: p6
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Freely Falling Charge: Radiates ?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: heating a room
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: *** rD
• Re: heating a room
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Wavefunction Increases Causation Toward Real Axis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: heating a room
  • From: henery Jimbo
• Re: heating a room
  • From: pirhosigma_01
• Wavefunction Increases Causation Toward Real Axis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: LeSage and gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Wavefunction Increases Causation Toward Real Axis
  • From: OsherD
• Re: heating a room
  • From: Jumbiee
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: heating a room
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• heating a room
  • From: pirhosigma_01
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: panteltje
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• LeSagian drag and the advance of Mercury's perihelion
  • From: stopgoblinlittleminds
• LeSage and gravity
  • From: stopgoblinlittleminds
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 733 June 15, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 733 June 15, 2005 by Phillip F.Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Intrinsic redshift.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity ? 1
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: Klassixx
• Re: Intrinsic redshift.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: Nosterill
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 733 June 15, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory Part 2
  • From: OsherD
• Intrinsic redshift.
  • From: John Sefton
• Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory Part 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: p6
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?
  • From: Dew
• Re: Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Gravity ? 1
  • From: *** rD
• Re: Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• why does toast fall butter-side down?
  • From: Null
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: kk
• Probable Influence Type 2 in Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Probability Scalar, Wave, or Field?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Probability Scalar, Wave, or Field?
  • From: OsherD
• Neutron Star Weigh-In
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Probability Scalar, Wave, or Field?
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: p6
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: Double-A
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Tertium Non Datur and Quantum
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: Tertium Non Datur and Quantum
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: jimp
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: hanson
• Re: Freely Falling Charge: Radiates ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Tertium Non Datur and Quantum
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: p6
• Re: Tertium Non Datur and Quantum
  • From: OsherD
• Tertium Non Datur and Quantum
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Mushield box
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Old Man
• Mushield box
  • From: p6
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Third-party developers of hardware and software make or break an OS.
  • From: Ku Karlovsky
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: p6
• Re: Philosophy of postscientism
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Wave/particle duality & Higgs coupling
  • From: p6
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Max Magnetic Field
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Philosophy of postscientism
  • From: Jack Martinelli
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: Jack Martinelli
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Richard Saam
• Max Magnetic Field
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Localization Via Witten and Chris Woodward
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: tadchem
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: bz
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Wave/particle duality & Higgs coupling
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Secrets of the Aether now on Google Print
  • From: David Thomson
• macroscopic quantum wavefunctions
  • From: mudpuppy
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Philosophy of postscientism
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wave/particle duality & Higgs coupling
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• expanding understaning of combustion
  • From: Peter Lowrie
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pope Benedict's Web Log!!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: mr_kurt_kingston
• Re: Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
  • From: Ofni
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Wave/particle duality & Higgs coupling
  • From: p6
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Noname
• Re: Pope Benedict's Web Log!!!
  • From: eyesacknootun
• Re: Wave/particle duality & Higgs coupling
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Causation as a Set
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Nick
• Observed Properties of Exoplanets: Masses, Orbits, and Metallicities
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Philosophy of postscientism
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/
  • From: PD
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: EL
• Wave/particle duality & Higgs coupling
  • From: p6
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• In Search for k
  • From: EL
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: This is as clear as the laws of physics.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: p6
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Freely Falling Charge: Radiates ?
  • From: Old Man
• http://www.haverford.edu/physics-astro/songs/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Punching
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Etch A Sketch?
  • From: RichD
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: p6
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Fermions to Bosons converter (Objects compactor)
  • From: EMy
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: parabolic shape test
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Mark Martin
• Winning At Craps (was: The probability of winning a tennis set or match...)
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Prugovecki: Right On Physics and Sociology, Wrong On Politics
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Madison Avenue Propaganda in Theoretical Physics
  • From: goozlefotz
• Re: Madison Avenue Propaganda in Theoretical Physics
  • From: goozlefotz
• Re: Madison Avenue Propaganda in Theoretical Physics
  • From: markwh04
• Madison Avenue Propaganda in Theoretical Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What do you want more ?
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• What do you want more ?
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Punching
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Is Mass A Fundamental Quantity?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: The beginning of the end of postscientism
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• The beginning of the end of postscientism
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Punching
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Black Hole Question
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Black Hole Question
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Jerry
• Re: big fat brown gravity
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c ; h-bar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Uncle Al
• Long 19 centuries before Newton invented gravity
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Maleki
• Re: quasars shot out by galaxies
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: lyricalforest
• Re: This is as clear as the laws of physics.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Science Radio
  • From: Maleki
• Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Quantum Geometric Field Theory of Prugovecki
  • From: OsherD
• Re: quasars shot out by galaxies
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: The Matter of "Dark Matter
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: parabolic shape test
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Little Woman or an EXTRATERRESTRIAL???
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• The Matter of "Dark Matter
  • From: Sknil
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Black Hole Question
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: bz
• Re: Black Hole Question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Black Hole Question
  • From: George
• Re: Cooper pairs in superconductor
  • From: p6
• Re: Cooper pairs in superconductor
  • From: p6
• Re: quasars shot out by galaxies
  • From: PD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: This is as clear as the laws of physics.
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Color EOTVOS: Will black people fall different from white people?
  • From: Dr Al E . Cat
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: srp
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: EMy
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: EMy
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 13, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: spin-orbit coupling (can this prove why Sefton is wrong?)
  • From: EMy
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: spin-orbit coupling (can this prove why Sefton is wrong?)
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Can electron really absorb acoustic wave?? how?
  • From: EMy
• Password for sci.physics: Problem of the Day
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Prugovecki: Right On Physics and Sociology, Wrong On Politics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Prugovecki: Right On Physics and Sociology, Wrong On Politics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Prugovecki: Right On Physics and Sociology, Wrong On Politics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can electron really absorb acoustic wave?? how?
  • From: EMy
• spin-orbit coupling (can this prove why Sefton is wrong?)
  • From: EMy
• Re: parabolic shape test
  • From: Frreita
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: parabolic shape test
  • From: Frreita
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: This is as clear as the laws of physics.
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: Little Woman or an EXTRATERRESTRIAL???
  • From: Klassixx
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: srp
• Re: parabolic shape test
  • From: dontinvalid
• Re: This is as clear as the laws of physics.
  • From: p6
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• This is as clear as the laws of physics.
  • From: Nick
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: FORCE OF GRAVITATION DOES NOT EXIST
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Punching
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Etch A Sketch?
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: Punching
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: jimp
• Re: Punching
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: Old Man
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: lay opinion
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: parabolic shape test
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Etch A Sketch?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: srp
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• parabolic shape test
  • From: Frreita
• Punching
  • From: RichD
• Re: Etch A Sketch?
  • From: Frreita
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Etch A Sketch?
  • From: RichD
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: jimp
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• TOE Probability Formulation 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: jimp
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: Relativity and Reasonableness Tests
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: hbar=e^2u0c
  • From: Uncle Al
• Collisional Excitation and Striations in Glow Discharges
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Can electron really absorb acoustic wave?? how?
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: jimp
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c
  • From: T Wake
• Re: h-bar=e^2u0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• quasars shot out by galaxies
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Can electron really absorb acoustic wave?? how?
  • From: John Sefton
• Relativity and Reasonableness Tests
  • From: Deen
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: Teaching physics with the Big Dig
  • From: Robert
• Re: Teaching physics with the Big Dig
  • From: Robert
• Conformity In Physics, A Critique of Prugovecki
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: srp
• Can electron really absorb acoustic wave?? how?
  • From: EMy
• Re: FORCE OF GRAVITATION DOES NOT EXIST
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA
  • From: R.Aparicio
• Re: hbar=e^2u0c
  • From: T Wake
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: big fat brown gravity
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Greysky
• hbar=e^2u0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Nick
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: PD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: EMy
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• Re: Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: PD
• Re: Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: PD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Detecting magnetic field inside atom
  • From: EMy
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: p6
• Yet Another Rail Gun Question
  • From: John Schutkeker
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• TOE Probability Formulation 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: hanson
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: hanson
• Re: Cowles Foundation of Yale
  • From: OsherD
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Langevin gaussian force
  • From: nico
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Cowles Foundation of Yale
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Micropower Heats Up: Propane fuel cell packs a lot of punch
  • From: George Orwell
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: PD
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: EMy
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Test
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Micropower Heats Up: Propane fuel cell packs a lot of punch
  • From: jimp
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Micropower Heats Up: Propane fuel cell packs a lot of punch
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Examining Mathematical Approaches
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Micropower Heats Up: Propane fuel cell packs a lot of punch
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: TOE Probability Formulation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: TOE Probability Formulation
  • From: OsherD
• TOE Probability Formulation
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: EMy
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Examining Mathematical Approaches
  • From: Daol
• John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
  • From: p6
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• Re: Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Re: Modification of Maxwell 2nd Equation or Monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• The probability of winning a tennis set or match...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Micropower Heats Up: Propane fuel cell packs a lot of punch
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• X-rays reveal more about exotic atoms (Jun 10)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: hanson
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: PD
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Infinity,Intelligent Life, New Worlds
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Nuclear Filaments?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Modification of Maxwell 2nd Equation or Monopoles
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Fitting of Data
  • From: dab722
• Why are deBroglie Pilot Waves rejected
  • From: EMy
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Modification of Maxwell 2nd Equation or Monopoles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pope Benedict's Web Log!!!
  • From: eyesacknootun
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Traveler
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 10 Jun 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Modification of Maxwell 2nd Equation or Monopoles
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Modification of Maxwell 2nd Equation or Monopoles
  • From: EMy
• Re: Pope Benedict's Web Log!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Fitting of Data
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Infinity,Intelligent Life, New Worlds
  • From: markwh04
• from infra-schizoid to ultra-fa-schizoid!!
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Eotvos, lay description?
  • From: MobyDikc
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: srp
• Re: Fitting of Data
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Fitting of Data
  • From: dab722
• Pope Benedict's Web Log!!!
  • From: Pontius Pilates
• Re: Fitting of Data
  • From: Old Man
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 10 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Antenna, EM generation, Ether, Atomic questions.
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Teaching physics with the Big Dig
  • From: bjlapen
• Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Radium used to stunt blood vessel growth?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Teaching physics with the Big Dig
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Radium used to stunt blood vessel growth?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: mathematics books for physics
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Measurement As Source
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: mudpuppy
• Re: Teaching physics with the Big Dig
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Antenna, EM generation, Ether, Atomic questions.
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Antenna, EM generation, Ether, Atomic questions.
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: PD
• Re: 2 kW arc
  • From: jimp
• Antenna, EM generation, Ether, Atomic questions.
  • From: EMy
• Teaching physics with the Big Dig
  • From: Robert
• Re: The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: 2 kW arc
  • From: Dave Sullivan
• The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light
  • From: Selpats
• Re: Fitting of Data
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Measurement As Source
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: tadchem
• Measurement As Source
  • From: OsherD
• mathematics books for physics
  • From: Magma
• Radium used to stunt blood vessel growth?
  • From: CyberDead
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: Magma
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: T Wake
• Fitting of Data
  • From: dab722
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: srp
• 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force equation
  • From: srp
• Re: Gravity
  • From: srp
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: Nick
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: mjb
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: confused about QM and angular momentum
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: PLANETS ORBIT THE SUN TO CONSERVE TOTAL ENERGY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Molecular surprise in one dimension
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: mudpuppy
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: Prakash Singh
• Re: superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: pete
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: pete
• superfluidity and identical particles
  • From: mudpuppy
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: EL
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Propane powers fuel cells
  • From: jimp
• Lisa Randall lecture tour in UK?
  • From: fellow
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Propane powers fuel cells
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: p6
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 2 kW arc
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Modelling orbits as rnigs
  • From: T Wake
• Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Re: Science Radio
  • From: cnctut
• Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Propane powers fuel cells
  • From: Uncle Al
• 2 electrons
  • From: Jens Riedel
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: Ron Verrall
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Propane powers fuel cells
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: The Brilliance of Our Teachers
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Science Radio
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Query on current through a forward-biased diode
  • From: JAH
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: PD
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force law
  • From: srp
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: srp
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: big fat brown gravity
  • From: Old Man
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: mjb
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: 2 kW arc
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: mjb
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: PD
• Re: How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: tadchem
• The Brilliance of Our Teachers
  • From: Dda
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.
  • From: bz
• How can NaCl dissolve in water? Can Any one explain this phenomenon in molecular level?
  • From: newedana
• Re: Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Modelling orbits as rnigs
  • From: nick flint
• Re: Old reliable vs new condensed value
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Modelling orbits as rnigs
  • From: nick flint
• Re: Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality
  • From: OsherD
• Speak for Yourself
  • From: cnctut
• Overlapping Fields and Individuality-Plurality
  • From: OsherD
• big fat brown gravity
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• 4th Maxwell equation and Lorentz force law
  • From: srp
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: srp
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: mjb
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: boo
• Re: Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: PD
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Individual-Plurality PI Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Individual-Plurality PI Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: SOiL
• Rigid Body Mechanics Question
  • From: mjb
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Individual-Plurality PI Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Individual-Plurality PI Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: 2 kW arc
  • From: Tangrammy
• Re: Propane powers fuel cells
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Discrete physics question.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: Taylor
• Re: 2 kW arc
  • From: Taylor
• 2 kW arc
  • From: Dave Sullivan
• What is the medical term for crackpottery and delusions of self-grandeur?
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Russell-Saunders paper
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: PD
• Re: Discrete physics question.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: I Speak for our Universe
  • From: cnctut
• Propane powers fuel cells
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Engineers vs physicists and other scientists
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Discrete physics question.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Discrete physics question.
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: srp
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Discrete physics question.
  • From: Rozmonth
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: atomic configuration and magnetic properties of matter
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Hurkimer
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: atomic configuration and magnetic properties of matter
  • From: Uncle Al
• atomic configuration and magnetic properties of matter
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: Gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: Spiro Zafiratos
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Reece
• Re: Query on current through a forward-biased diode
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Reece
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Reece
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Reece
• Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.
  • From: bz
• Re: Infinity,Intelligent Life, New Worlds
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Gravity
  • From: srp
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: Garry Denke
• Re: Science Radio
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Gravity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Russell-Saunders paper
  • From: Maleki
• Re: The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Gravity
  • From: Piet den Dulk
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: confused about QM and angular momentum
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Hurkimer
• Re: Aharonov-Bohm Nonlocality Error
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Aharonov-Bohm Nonlocality Error
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Destructive interference in light waves questions
  • From: Reece
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: John Sefton
• The Right Angle Lever Paradox
  • From: Dda
• Re: Aharonov-Bohm Nonlocality Error
  • From: OsherD
• Aharonov-Bohm Nonlocality Error
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Breathtaking development of the theory of relativity
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: confused about QM and angular momentum
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Science Radio
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Query on current through a forward-biased diode
  • From: JAH
• Re: heat capacity of a diatomic gas
  • From: Zigoteau
• lenticular cloud formations
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 1
  • From: mountain man
• Re: heat capacity of a diatomic gas
  • From: Zigoteau
• Quantum Plurality and Individuality 4
  • From: OsherD
• Re: heat capacity of a diatomic gas
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 3
  • From: OsherD
• Quantum Plurality and Individuality 3
  • From: OsherD
• Russell-Saunders paper
  • From: Allan Adler
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: newbie current question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: New Jobs open up for PhDs in Physics
  • From: Zod
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: New Jobs open up for PhDs in Physics
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: newbie current question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Quantum Plurality and Individuality 2
  • From: OsherD
• US [housing] bubble set to burst
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Quantum Plurality and Individuality 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Quantum Plurality and Individuality 1
  • From: OsherD
• Re: newbie current question
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: srp
• newbie current question
  • From: aglist
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Science Radio
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: PD
• Re: Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: PD
• Modeling an Electromagnetic Wave
  • From: Magma
• Re: confused about QM and angular momentum
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Re: Infinity,Intelligent Life, New Worlds
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Infinity,Intelligent Life, New Worlds
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: bryant_j_j
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: p6
• Re: confused about QM and angular momentum
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: forehead
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: forehead
• Re: Infinity,Intelligent Life, New Worlds
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Doppler Effect.
  • From: Michael Mcneil
• Re: Doppler Effect.
  • From: Michael Mcneil
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: New Jobs open up for PhDs in Physics
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Hard-Boil Eggs in a Microwave Oven
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: moron bilge sends your posts to his groups alt.moron and alt.troll
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Why the Aether is Substantial
  • From: Ivan V. Krasnyj
• Re: Quasars are photons!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Jobs open up for PhDs in Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• confused about QM and angular momentum
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Quasars are photons!
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: New Jobs open up for PhDs in Physics
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Evolution of consciousness
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Evolution of consciousness
  • From: Maleki
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• New Jobs open up for PhDs in Physics
  • From: Zod
• Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.
  • From: bz
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Evolution of consciousness
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Uncle Al
• Ping Qi-on: Tiller on Art Bell
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Hard-Boil Eggs in a Microwave Oven
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• I'm looking for a ball pen
  • From: Sunatori, Go Simon
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: tadchem
• heat capacity of a diatomic gas
  • From: Olof Ohlsson Sax
• Re: Evolution of consciousness
  • From: remcdonald
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Stuck on a problem for two days
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Marco Maier
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: bz
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Software challenges and solutions
  • From: forehead
• Software challenges and solutions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: What happens to "Slow" photons?
  • From: SOiL
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Rantrod
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Rantrod
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Rantrod
• Re: GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA
  • From: anonymous coward
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: SOiL
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Resolving Forces Between Planets -- Am I doing this right?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: hhc314
• Re: New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What happens to "Slow" photons?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: spinning black hole
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: QFT question
  • From: George Jones
• Re: What happens to "Slow" photons?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Variable speed of light?
  • From: me
• Re: What happens to "Slow" photons?
  • From: me
• Variable speed of light?
  • From: Rantrod
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: What happens to "Slow" photons?
  • From: mmeron
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 6 June 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• What happens to "Slow" photons?
  • From: me
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: $124.50 physics book for free!
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: Stuck on a problem for two days
  • From: Edward Green
• Causation Via Bohr's Attempt to Unify Kant and Einstein 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Resolving Forces Between Planets -- Am I doing this right?
  • From: SOiL
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Causation Via Bohr's Attempt to Unify Kant and Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Airbag safety study
  • From: Bruce Sinclair
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: NOMINATIONS: Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Brad Guth
• Resolving Forces Between Planets -- Am I doing this right?
  • From: jjyooi
• Re: High strength fibers for high pressure tubes.
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: SQUIRMIN' VERMIN ... Truth vs. Evolution Fiction - Die Welt des Unerklarlichen
  • From: T Wake
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Stuck on a problem for two days
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Stuck on a problem for two days
  • From: Gaganpreet Singh Arora
• New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Marco Maier
• The Shocking Truth Made Barenaked
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Numerical Integration in Matlab
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Uncle Al
• New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Marco Maier
• New idea about the twin paradox
  • From: Marco Maier
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: 9-2 orbital
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: srp
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Geoff Taylor
• Re: Causation Via Bohr's Attempt to Unify Kant and Einstein
  • From: srp
• Re: 9-2 orbital
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Causation Via Bohr's Attempt to Unify Kant and Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: yt56erd
• Causation Via Bohr's Attempt to Unify Kant and Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: hbar=e^2/e0c
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: SQUIRMIN' VERMIN ... Truth vs. Evolution Fiction - Die Welt des Unerklarlichen
  • From: Kevin Cunningham
• How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?
  • From: Mho
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: The Aether and the Trolls
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Energy is spin.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: $124.50 physics book for free!
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Permittivity Questions about Neoprene
  • From: zfirth
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Golden Boar
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 06, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Energy is spin.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: 9-2 orbital
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 - Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 - Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 - Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 - Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: A Question About Friction...
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• A Question About Friction...
  • From: campbell . wil
• Re: Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 - Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 4 Quantum Logic
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: spinning black hole
  • From: karan
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: Reece
• Re: $124.50 physics book for free!
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: Isaac Wingfield
• Re: $124.50 physics book for free!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: Zod
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: $124.50 physics book for free!
  • From: p6
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: p6
• Re: $124.50 physics book for free!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: Zod
• Re: Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Use Jupiter to measure c(v).
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Maxwell "Quantum Model"?
  • From: p6
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Edward Green
• Black Hole Found?
  • From: Jim Goodman
• Re: One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: jimp
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• You Speak for Yourself
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: fotoobscura
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Solar reflectors on roofs
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Question about Cesium-133 and time keeping.
  • From: fotoobscura
• Re: Ballistics Problem Newton Worked on
  • From: junoexpress
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Numerical Integration in Matlab
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Ballistics Problem Newton Worked on
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 3.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Stephen Hawking's Contradiction
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Causation Underlies Spacetime? Part 3.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation "Underlies" Spacetime? Part 2.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Causation "Underlies" Spacetime? Part 2.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Causation "Underlies" Spacetime? Part 2.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Numerical Integration in Matlab
  • From: Hank
• Causation "Underlies" Spacetime? Part 2.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: srp
• Re: Stephen Hawking's Contradiction
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Numerical Integration in Matlab
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Stephen Hawking's Contradiction
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: QFT question
  • From: George Jones
• Re: Stephen Hawking's Contradiction
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Telescopic Time Travel?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: CWatters
• help with series utilized in quantum statistics
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: mmeron
• Re: What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: mmeron
• Spectroradiometer and graphing software.
  • From: Joseph Chamberlain, DDS
• Re: Causation "Underlies" Spacetime? Part 1.
  • From: OsherD
• Causation "Underlies" Spacetime? Part 1.
  • From: OsherD
• Ballistics Problem Newton Worked on
  • From: mathimagical
• Re: What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: cnctut
• Re: What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: Tom
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• One for the foil-hat crowd
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: jimp
• A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ruoy
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: 9-2 orbital
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: 9-2 orbital
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: 9-2 orbital
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Volcanism to Global-Warming Re: my prediction of more than 3 ma...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: hammonds madness
  • From: yt56erd
• What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: Skybuck Flying
• Re: What's more explosive Gas or Dynamite ?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: BUDDAH BING...BUDDAH BANG...BUDDAH//BAUGH
  • From: T Wake
• 9-2 orbital
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: jimp
• Re: hammonds madness
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Newbie question about the Twin Paradox
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: BUDDAH BING...BUDDAH BANG...BUDDAH//BAUGH
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: The Un-Born in QM
  • From: PD
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: hammonds madness
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: hammonds madness
  • From: jcgonsowski
• Re: hammonds madness
  • From: jcgonsowski
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: billion dollars question
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Newbie question about the Twin Paradox
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Measurement Problem and the Double Slit Experiment II
  • From: OsherD
• Measurement Problem and the Double Slit Experiment II
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Putting the Reins on Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Newbie question about the Twin Paradox
  • From: T Wake
• Re: billion dollars question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Putting the Reins on Light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Measurement Problem and the Double Slit Experiment I
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: jimp
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Putting the Reins on Light
  • From: SOiL
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Uncle Al
• Measurement Problem and the Double Slit Experiment I
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Uncle Al
• Newbie question about the Twin Paradox
  • From: Marco Maier
• Re: Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Schwarzenegger parts company with delusional White House
  • From: cnctut
• Numerical Integration in Matlab
  • From: Hank
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: srp
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: cjcountess
• billion dollars question
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Baugh
• Re: Putting the Reins on Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: particles traveling at light speed
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Science and prostitution
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Investing on a Whiff: Chemical spray shows power as trust booster
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: particles traveling at light speed
  • From: zlham
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: equation about scalar and vectorial product... explain me please :)
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Putting the Reins on Light
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: OsherD
• Double Slit Experiment Explained
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Energy is spin.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Science and prostitution
  • From: Pentcho Valev
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Highway interchanges can get you into knotty situations
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Investing on a Whiff: Chemical spray shows power as trust booster
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Superfast atom shuffling inspires data-storage
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: logan
• Re: The Un-Born in QM
  • From: logan
• Re: Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Oxygen loses its magnetism under pressure
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Algebraic Chaos: Von Neumann vs Dirac
  • From: OsherD
• Putting the Reins on Lig
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Putting the Reins on Light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: PD
• Re: The Un-Born in QM
  • From: PD
• Re: Algebraic Chaos: Von Neumann vs Dirac
  • From: OsherD
• The Un-Born in QM
  • From: logan
• Re: Algebraic Chaos: Von Neumann vs Dirac
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Electron magnetic moment inside magnetic field
  • From: logan
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Permittivity Questions about Neoprene
  • From: UpChunky
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: jimp
• Re: A strange attractor?
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Franz Heymann
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: UpChunky
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• A strange attractor?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Algebraic Chaos: Von Neumann vs Dirac
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Newly registered at crank.net
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Newly registered at crank.net
  • From: T Wake
• Newly registered at crank.net
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 3 Jun 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Locality and Phases II: Hibernation and Changing Alpha
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Locality and Phases II: Hibernation, Changing Alpha, etc.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Locality and Phases II: Hibernation and Changing Alpha
  • From: OsherD
• Locality and Phases II: Hibernation, Changing Alpha, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Locality and Phases II: Hibernation and Changing Alpha
  • From: OsherD
• Locality and Phases II: Hibernation and Changing Alpha
  • From: OsherD
• Re: career problems
  • From: mmeron
• Re: career problems
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Permittivity Questions about Neoprene
  • From: jimp
• Permittivity Questions about Neoprene
  • From: zfirth
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• GEOMETRIC ALGEBRA
  • From: R.Aparicio
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Locality and Phases I.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Locality and Phases I.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Locality and Phases I.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Locality and Phases I.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: equation about scalar and vectorial product... explain me please :)
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Locality and Phases I.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Energy is spin.
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Maleki
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Maleki
• pmobile prove
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: John Sefton
• The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe
  • From: Ypoc
• Re: Energy is spin.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• California Coast University (Legitimately accredited/approved)
  • From: S Klarfeld
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC
  • From: hanson
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Maleki
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 27 May 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Maleki
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: srp
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Energy is spin.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: spinning black hole
  • From: karan
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: Pat
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Energy is spin.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Time Moving Lefty
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: cnctut
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: jimp
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: cnctut
• New light on early stars
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: jimp
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time Moving Lefty
  • From: Nick
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Heating vs. Cooling - please help...
  • From: Upchuckie!
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Acceleration of Gravity at Angles on a Lever
  • From: kvbmcz
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Acceleration of Gravity at Angles on a Lever
  • From: Philip Holman
• Re: equation about scalar and vectorial product... explain me please :)
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: PD
• Re: Retic Postings and SPAM
  • From: Sam Wormley
• HELP: Acceleration of Gravity at Angles on a Lever
  • From: kvbmcz
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: The inverse square law of gravity
  • From: george_llew_jones
• Re: relatively relativistic
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED
  • From: LeoK
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: hanson
• Re: relatively relativistic
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The inverse square law of gravity
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: relatively relativistic
  • From: oldton
• Re: relatively relativistic
  • From: oldton
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: tadchem
• Re: The inverse square law of gravity
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Retic Postings and SPAM
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The inverse square law of gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time Moving Lefty
  • From: T Wake
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• equation about scalar and vectorial product... explain me please :)
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: GRAVITATION DEFINED
  • From: LeoK
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: srp
• Re: NASA Sees Orbiting Stars Flooding Space with Gravitational Waves
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Elementary Physics
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: From Magnetic Monopoles 1/2 orbits are stupid
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: From Magnetic Monopoles to Magnetic Loops
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: hanson
• Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Phase Paradox III: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nonlocality explained - analytically.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Phase Paradox III: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Phase Paradox III: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: cjcountess
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Phase Paradox III: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: relatively relativistic
  • From: Mark Martin
• Phase Paradox III: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The inverse square law of gravity
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: relatively relativistic
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: bz
• Retic Postings and SPAM
  • From: Hcraes
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: srp
• The inverse square law of gravity
  • From: Martin Johansen
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• relatively relativistic
  • From: supermoron
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Elementary Physics
  • From: Carel van der Togt
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Neutrinos: ghosts of matter
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Phase Paradox II: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: Happy Dog
• Re: Phase Paradox II: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: QFT question
  • From: FrediFizzx
• new june caption
  • From: Null
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: Morituri-|-Max
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: A SIMPLE QST BUT REALLY SCI.PHY
  • From: kuttu
• Re: Time Moving Lefty
  • From: Lefty
• Re: God is not happy
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Lefty
• God is not happy
  • From: kstocklmeir
• God is not happy
  • From: kstocklmeir
• God is not happy
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: srp
• Re: NOMINATIONS: Re: Bad News for 'Moon Hoax' Buffs
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Upchucky
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: srp
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA Sees Orbiting Stars Flooding Space with Gravitational Waves
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Time Moving Lefty
  • From: Nick
• Phase Paradox II: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Latest PhysicsWeb Summaries (June 1, 2005)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Book Reviews
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: jimp
• Time Moving Lefty
  • From: Nick
• Neutrinos: ghosts of matter
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: hanson
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Nick
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: make your pick!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: The Aether and Relativity
  • From: hhc314
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Phase Paradox: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• The Aether and Relativity
  • From: Laurent
• Phase Paradox: Heisenberg vs Einstein
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Nick
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: career problems
  • From: cnctut
• Re: Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: point charge in a sphere (help)
  • From: Nick
• Nuclear war? No thanks
  • From: Jimmy
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Platopes
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: p6
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: p6
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Causation: How It Originates in Algebra, Category Theory, Topology, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Causation: How It Originates in Algebra, Category Theory, Topology, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: Causation: How It Originates in Algebra, Category Theory, Topology, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Traveler
• Causation: How It Originates in Algebra, Category Theory, Topology, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: T Wake
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Mitch Perkins
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites.
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: NASA Sees Orbiting Stars Flooding Space with Gravitational Waves
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: acetone/lubricants emulsion or water/lubricants
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Density falls at the event horizon?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Raymond Yohros
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Why Is the Half-Life of Subatomic Particles Probabilistic?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• acetone/lubricants emulsion or water/lubricants
  • From: heiack
• Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?
  • From: Tsew
• Re: make your pick!
  • From: tadchem
• Re: make your pick!
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: "In Search of the Big Bang" (brief review)
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Lefty
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: PD
• Re: Maximum resolution of spy satellites.
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: tadchem
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: NASA Sees Orbiting Stars Flooding Space with Gravitational Waves
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: make your pick!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: All right -exposed to nukes
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: All right -exposed to nukes
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: Mark Martin
• make your pick!
  • From: Dobri Karagorgov
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: yt56erd
• Re: Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Aether ruled by Relativity
  • From: p6
• Re: Anybody know the weight density of k?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Quantum Gravity
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: neutrino interaction
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: QFT question
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Evidence of the Existence of the Aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: much slower than light
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Momentum Question
  • From: mmeron
• Momentum Question
  • From: George
• Re: Banach vs Hilbert Spaces: How the Split Originates
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Crop Circles
  • From: kuttu
• Re: Banach vs Hilbert Spaces: How the Split Originates
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Orbiting charge radiating...
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Banach vs Hilbert Spaces: How the Split Originates
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Banach vs Hilbert Spaces: How the Split Originates
  • From: OsherD
• Banach vs Hilbert Spaces: How the Split Originates
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Lefty
• Shockley quotation
  • From: Anonymous
• Re: tj Frazir sightings
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Nick
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: All right -exposed to nukes
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: All right -exposed to nukes
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Young's modulus units
  • From: operator jay
• Re: Anybody know the weight density of k?
  • From: pete
• Re: Quantum Algebra 2: The Contribution from U.K., USA
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Young's modulus units
  • From: rgiuly
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "In Search of the Big Bang" (brief review)
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: bz
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Nick
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: Nick
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: LeoK
• Re: Do Neutrinos Have Spin?
  • From: Ross A. Finlayson
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: PD
• Re: Time is an illusion
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Questions for all Alternative Atomic Modelers
  • From: p6
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: michalchik
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: michalchik
• Re: Beat frequencies and optical properties?
  • From: michalchik