Re: Time Moving Lefty


> The only evidence that time is moving comes from relativity.
> If you accelerate in space time slows down. Why?
> What if time moves at light speed and by speeding up
> you can catch up to it?
> If you could catch up to light; which you can't; time would stop.
> This implies that if time moves it moves at that
> fundamental constant we know of as the speed of light.
>
> Mitch -- Time is never still --
>


How would this jive with Planck's quantization of time ?









.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... fundamental part of physics since at least the time of Newton. ... I don't reject Galilean relativity, ... What my transformation predicts is that a moving stick is contracted ... but forgetting that the rest frame remains S, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR fundamental contradiction
    ... fundamental part of physics since at least the time of Newton. ... I don't reject Galilean relativity, ... What my transformation predicts is that a moving stick is contracted ... when a moving clock shows a time ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Doppler effect
    ... of view it is moving toward you at x m/sec. ... relativity we still have a perfectly good object which might be called ... that's _not_ the closing velocity at measured in ... the rest frame of the sink, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Problem with Einsteins Train Thought Experiment
    ... object is not moving directly towards the observer. ... There is no physics in the thought experiment. ... laws of motion take the same form in all inertial frames. ... relativity by asserting that all laws of physics take the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: "How Does Light Know How Fast to Travel?"
    ... Is that by him moving faster in the medium, ... Einstein stated that relativity 'puts forward no specific hypothesis' he at least understood that relativity lacks a credible theoretical structure having tried and failed to come up with one. ... By adopting the 'no aether doctrine' physics has probably ensured that it will never have a theoretical structure so physics has redefined itself to say that physical interpretation is an unnecessary adjunct to a mathematical model. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)