Re: neutrino interaction
- From: "Raymond Yohros" <bat@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Jun 2005 13:28:47 -0700
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
> Raymond Yohros wrote:
> > can this gravitation FX be produce by something other that matr?
>
> As I already pointed out: by energy. Photons cause gravity. Dark
> Energy causes gravity.
>
ther's no proove of that. i think some depressions in spacetime
are caused by old decaing blackholes that run out
of matenergy to swallow.
>
> > Because the weakforce can't survive in empty cold enviroments.
>
> Why on earth do you think so???
>
> > the constant friction of matenergy is what keeps the weakforce
> > going.
>
> Why on earth do you think so??? The weak force has precisely nil to
> do with friction!
>
oh, come on, where do you see the weakforce beside
the big bang, blackholes swallowing matenergy, quasars,
the stars in galaxies or any other enviroment that is
ritch with electromagnetic radiation? where?
in open space?
weak boson don't travel, they are too heavy so they
always decay in the enviroments i mention above.
the weakforce belongs to hi density places, the
kind that exist in young stages of the universe.
the universe is still a baby and maybe that is way
many people fail to see this!
>
> > electrons can also be communication particles
>
> You just said that communication particles are particles which move at
> c. Electrons don't do that.
>
Again, i was speaking loosly, if electrons where not a
communication particle then we will not have any electronics.
>
> > but they are easely trap by nuclei.
>
> So what? Interstellar space is quite empty. Not much there to trap them.
>
there are static particles and there are moving particles.
the ones that are moving are the ones to bring someting
from their place of origin to ther places of the universe.
why is that so hard to understand!!!
>
> > any particle that's moving
> > in spacetime at great speed it's a communication particle.
> > they carry information from one place to another.
>
> Yes. So what? I still think it's strange to call them "communication
> particles" because of that.
>
> >>>yes but i imagine neutrino density alot stronger than
> >>>photonic energy when all the stars are dead.
> >>
> >>Why do you imagine that? Have you ever done a calculation on that,
> >>or simply looked at the numbers? You *do* know that numbers for the
> >>photon and the neutrino density are available in cosmology books,
> >>don't you?
> >
> >
> > i know the numbers now and for times behind and ahead
>
> I doubt that. Give the numbers, please.
>
O.K, i Lie to you , i'm sorry.
i don't know the numbers.
>
>> > but we are talking about the future of spacetime when
> > stars are no longer visible in the sky anymore!
> > can you imagine neutrino density by then?
>
> Imagine, no. Calculate, yes.
>
but i'm very sure of this:
neutrino density will be alot stronger that photonic energy
when all stars are dead.
Can anyone with the numbers bring them forward please?
thanks
raymond
www.sonofsound.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: neutrino interaction
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: neutrino interaction
- References:
- Re: neutrino interaction
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: neutrino interaction
- From: Raymond Yohros
- Re: neutrino interaction
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: neutrino interaction
- From: Raymond Yohros
- Re: neutrino interaction
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: neutrino interaction
- Prev by Date: Re: Permittivity Questions about Neoprene
- Next by Date: Re: career problems
- Previous by thread: Re: neutrino interaction
- Next by thread: Re: neutrino interaction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|