John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
- From: "p6" <atomicp6@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Jun 2005 04:51:53 -0700
(Excerpt of explosive Chapter 1 further below.)
Bjoern, Bilge and other multi talented debunkers/analyzers as well as
those who have studied this at length and know some killer arguments &
counterarguments,
What follows is chapter 1 of John Polasek's "Dual Space". I'm
sorry John but I won't post other chapter or passages. I just
need to post this for multidisciplinary scrutiny since your stuff
is quite complex and you claimed to have the Theory of Everything.
I got fired up whenever I saw a work that claimed to have solved
it. This is what occured in Mccutcheon's, Seto's, Thomson's, Dr.
Yoon's and countless others. But there is one thing different in
Polasek "Dual Space" because it focuses on the causal mechanisms
of the standard model. It didn't try to wipe out QM although it
tried to stretch relativity to breaking point. Also even if one
concept is real such as explaining the pioneer gravity anomaly,
it would be awesome, something the above dudes weren't able to
do. Therefore calling experts in relativity, etc. pls point out any
counter-arguments if there is anything obviously wrong. I admit I
can't analyze it entirely and it's bugging me for a month. If no
one to comment, then let's wait for the good ole reliable Bjoern.
Excerpt from John Polasek "Dual Space" (don't be mad John, this
would be the last and only except I'd share from your book) :)
"Dual Space - summary
The other half of physics!
Dual Space shows a side of physics never seen before, disclosing
another universe that is also the mother of our universe! We
first quantify the smallest subdivision of space, whose density
then forces us to recognize a second universe! A new law of
gravity makes General Relativity obsolete. Table 8 (page 207)
shows the (over 20) new fundamental quantities that were
discovered. These are some of the new findings:
*Our universe, "Uspace", is just the second of two spaces!
* It was created from the first space, "Espace".
* Espace contains only electron-positron pairs and it is 5 million
times as dense as Uspace.
* Electrons taken at creation weakened Espace, causing gravity.
* Creation left a mirror image of our universe in Espace in the form of
anti-particles.
* Espace "backs up" the vacuum of Uspace and solves the vacuum/gravity
problem
* E = MC2 is the energy of creation. (MC2 cannot be extracted).
* Physical laws and gravity act only in solid Espace but we feel their
effects in Uspace even in the vacuum!
* The "Navier-Stokes" law in Espace explains gravity and replaces
General Relativity.
* Only Dual Space can explain the Pioneer 10 anomaly. The Pioneer 10
Anomaly is a key part of our cosmic model. * The F.S.C. (fine structure
constant) alpha is not the "electromagnetic coupling constant"; it is
the scale factor between Espace and Uspace.
* Our universe speeds through Espace at the speed of light, which is
how we experience time.
* The universe is still being created at 102,000 suns/sec. fueled by
the alpha expansion.
* This creation rate appears to generate the CMBR.
* Time is absolute. There is no time dilation.
Chapter 1 Overview of Dual Space Theory
".... if we do discover a complete theory, it should in time be
understandable in broad principle by everyone, not just a few
scientists. Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists, and just
ordinary people, be able to take part in the discussion of the
question of why it is that we and the universe exist. If we find
the answer to that, it would be the ultimate triumph of human
reason for then we would know the mind of God."
---Stephen Hawking A Brief History of Time Page 175 Bantam
Books
Dual Space shows the other side of physics: a 2nd universe!
Dual Space proves there is a second universe not previously
considered in modem physics! In Chapter 1, we try to broadly
sketch out Dual Space as "the complete theory, which should in
time be understandable in broad principle by everyone...". (see
above). Our study begins by finding the fundamental subdivision
of space, followed by a method of creation, followed by a new
theory of gravity and finally a new theory of the cosmos such
that, again quoting, "then we might know the hand (if not mind)
of God". Eac h new finding forced the next new finding and at
each step, mathematics were used to prove the premise. The use of
mathematics cannot be avoided to prove findings that might
otherwise seem unimaginable.
One space is not enough
Until now, science has assumed the universe was a single space,
but I have discovered that there are two spaces. The new space is
the "dual" of our vacuum and is the one from which our universe
was created! This second space can do the impossible jobs that we
have expected of our vacuum, namely to carry gravity, light and
radio waves. The physicist Paul Dirac found the vacuum to be
filled with electrons, but did not follow the idea through when
positrons were found.
I was forced to the conclusion that our universe was created out
of this much larger and denser space! With the two spaces working
in tandem we are able to dispose of many current artificial
theories, and to derive several dozen brand new physical
quantities. Dual Space is surely the idea that Dr. Wheeler (see
frontispiece) had in mind as "an idea so simple, so beautiful",
and arriving "in a decade", matching his first guess.
Vacuum, the #1 problem
Vacuum is a big problem in modem science because it is expected
to perform miracles. For example, the vacuum must carry a force
of 4 billion billion tons for 93 million miles of empty space
between Sun and earth to keep us in orbit. In addition, the
vacuum must carry hundreds of kilowatts from thousands of radio
stations through empty space. These are miracles, and science
does not readily tolerate miracles. Our new theory of Dual Space
shows that the vacuum has a "twin" or dual, and both spaces exist
simul taneously! Having this second space naturally broadens our
scope, and actually makes room for the miracles!
Current concept of Space
Figure (a) is Newton's 3- dimensional version of our universe
where time is just a parameter. Figure (b) is Einstein's version
in which he has mathematically added time, but the result is
something we cannot visualize. Relativity has led to a number of
paradoxes.
Dual Space, the "new covenant"
Figure (c) is an entirely new concept. The smaller block,
"Uspace", is the same as our universe in (a), but now we see it
as being created out of the second larger space, "Espace". Espace
is a dense matrix of electron-positron pairs, the raw material
out of which our universe was created. Its existence is
rigorously derived in Ch.3 and 8. P.A.M. Dirac had an inkling of
this region when he envisioned what he called a "sea of
electrons". Quantum electrodynamics also identifies with a
(essentially undefined) " quantum vacuum", a fuzzy version of
Espace.
Furthermore, my equation (6-16) shows that our universe is
traveling at the velocity of light in Espace, which is how we
sense the passage of time! Without a doubt, having our universe
flying through another space at the velocity of light will cause
us to revise many of our present concepts.
In short, our universe, Uspace, is "merely" a collection of
objects separated by vacuum. Vacuum cannot support fields such as
gravity, electricity and light. Therefore, our universe has no
proper SPACE at all, except for that separation that is made good
in Espace. Espace is a proper space that governs gravity and
electromagnetics. Every object in our Uspace (universe) is imaged
in Espace as corresponding anti-particles! Order is imposed on
Uspace by the 1: 1 tie to Espace!
Parallel Universe Theory
According to [24] parallel universe theories are being
entertained, in four levels. In the first level it is suggested
that each person would have a twin ("doppelganger, Ger.) who made
the same moves! This universe would lie beyond 1028 meters which
is roughly 100 times the estimated radius of the universe.
Vacuum holds the secret of gravity
When I tried to find a better theory of gravity, 1 soon found
that the mystery of the vacuum had to be solved first. Vacuum has
a fundamental quality called permittivity that can be tested with
a simple vacuum capacitor experiment (Ch.3). With the experiment
and just a few equations, coupled with Anderson s famous 1932
pair-production discovery, (Ch.3) the secrets of the vacuum were
exposed!
We found that the vacuum seems to be densely packed with
electron/positron pairs, (e-p+) in concert with Anderson's
discovery of pair-production in 1932. Further logic proved that
there must be a second space, which finally led to a proper
gravity.
Tightly packed pairs
The e-p+ pairs in the new space are each "bound" inside a cell of
size 3.5x 10-14 meters ("A") (Ch.3) so the "material" is 5
million times as dense as iron (Ch.5)! Thus the vacuum appears
sirnultaneously to contain both extreme density and total
vacuity! The explanation could be a second space that would be an
exact dual of our vacuum, just as "everything" would be to
44nothing", and thus the Dual Space theory (Ch. 8) was born.
Espace easily accounts for both gravity and electromagnetic
waves.
Why has no one discovered Espace before?
The blind spot was that the CGS system of electrostatics teaches
that the vacuum possesses no quality that could be tested. A
newer S.I. school (ca. 1960) regards permittivity on a par with
elasticity in metals, which opened the way to discovery of Dual
Space. The CGS school is giving way slowly to S.I. A full
discussion appears in App. B.
The role of Espace.
The extreme density of Espace we found in Ch. 5 immediately
established its predominance over our Uspace.
In the beginning there was Espace, a gigantic "block" of raw
material. (See figure c). Then someone, not less than a Supreme
Being, created our universe ("Uspace"), from electrons taken from
Espace (Ch.8). The taking of electrons caused strains in Espace,
which directly caused gravity. (Ch. 10).
After Creation
The miracle of Creation is that only electrons were removed. The
act of Creation separated each electron from its mate, a Positron
that was then left behind! Our laboratories can only "blast out"
these particles in pairs, and then only with gamma or cosmic
rays, and they quickly rejoin 2 and "annihilate". It requires the
tremendous energy of 1/2mc^2 to remove a bound electron from its
cell. Most importantly, the positron and its created mate
thereafter retain a perfect 1: 1 correspondence (Ch. 8), as
needed for our law of gravity.
Finding time
Time is the 4th dimension in Espace, whereas Uspace has only 3
dimensions. Time began for us only after the second step in
creation following the separation step: the Supreme Being
accelerated our Uspace to the speed of light! This required
additional energy 1/2 mc^2, which when added to the partition
energy, makes a total of 1 mc^2 . The physical meaning of E=mc^2
is that every created object in our entire universe, moves
("progresses") at the velocity of light!! But this also means
that for positrons, eq ual in mass to our universe, we have the
equation, not Ep = mc^2 but Ep = 0!!! The electron's energy is
zero in its "womb" in Espace, and can only attain MC^2 with those
two steps. The claim of general relativity that energy is subject
to gravity is disproved.
Passage of time
In our 3-dimensional Uspace, we only sense the passage of time,
and gain our very existence, due to this velocity c. Clearly, we
possess neither yesterday, nor tomorrow, only NOW! (Ch. 8 & 9).
In effect, we are viewing the 4th dimension, time, through a slit
as we speed along.
Expansion and cooking
After Creation there was expansion and clustering and cooling,
during which time modem science agrees that electrons "cooked"
into neutrons and the heavier elements. It is another brilliancy
that the initial mass of created electrons contained a complete
plan for self-assembly into a hundred kinds of atoms! (It is the
arduous task of quantum mechanics to try to learn the rules!). It
is hard to see how the simple intricacies built into the 100
elements could contain within themselves the rules to make as per
fect a world as we have, and yet we routinely accept the infinite
variations possible with DNA!
Expansion and the fine structure constant FSC
Science has for ages pondered the meaning of alpha, the FSC,
known vaguely as the electromagnetic coupling constant. Dual
Space says that the volume of the material stuff of our universe
enlarged by I/alpha or 137 times since Creation!! (Eq. 11-2) (The
FSC enlargement is distinct from expansion of the universe). The
volume expansion factor of 1/alpha^3 or 2.5 million would exactly
reduce the initial enormous electron density, to the density of
iron. Iron is a very good proxy for the material of the universe
Thus a may be the scale factor between Uspace and Espace, and
hence, between particle and wave! For example the Compton
wavelength in Uspace, when shrunk down by a, equals our cell
radius A2 in Espace.
Our anti-particle twin
After Creation, every created electron has maintained a
correspondence with its positron. Therefore, our entire universe
appears in duplicate form as anti-particles in Espace. Each of us
has a "spirit" in Espace.
Modern science cannot find the antiparticles that were created in
equal numbers with particles. Of course, this is because they are
locked up in Espace, a region unknown to science. Figure 8-3 from
Chap. 8 below) gives a simplistic and wholly inadequate hint of
the miraculous duality.
Every electron ever created has its mate in Espace. If somehow it
could become "uncreated", it would generate energy of mc^2 on its
return "home" but, as will be shown, this is impossible.
Free Will and gravity
Gravity and electromagnetic effects act only in Espace. If
something falls down, it falls first in Espace, and the 1: 1
correspondence does the rest. We can even make a case for the
principle of 'Tree will": in Uspace we creatures decide what to
do, but it is the laws of Espace that decides whether we can do
it or not! In Uspace we have kinematics, and in Espace, we have
dynamics, that is, obedience to physical laws. Uspace proposes,
and Espace disposes!
Stiffness and density and C^2
The unbelievable stiffness and density of Espace together give it
a signal velocity c, and its energy density is measured by c^2.
(Ch. 5, 6). As with any material, when substance has been removed
internally, as it was during creation, (Ch. 8) stresses and
strains will result from the dislocations. These stresses are the
cause of gravity, which in turn is governed by a simple equation.
The gravity equation
Our new gravity law cdc/dr = -g = MG/r^2 (10-8) simply asserts
that a gradient or slope in velocity c causes gravity g, and
conversely, dc/dr cannot exist without gravity. The Dual Space
law tells what it is that makes gravity, and Newton's law defines
its distribution (Ch.10). It can explain everything claimed by
general relativity in a straightforward manner. Relativity also
defines a form of stress, but it attempts to do it in the vacuum
of a synthetic space-time (see Fig. 1-2), which is totally devoid
o f content. GR requires the fiction of time dilation-we use our
porosity law.
Slowdown in c at earth
Our gravity law says the velocity of light reaching earth from
infinity will be reduced, but by a mere 0.208 meters per second.
(c = 300,000,000 m/s). 0.208 mls is directly responsible for a
surface gravity of 9.8 M1S2 , as well as for the enormous escape
velocity of 11,180 m/s. Dual Space theory shows that this escape
velocity is "paid for" by the small loss in c!! In fact,
gravitational potential energy is stored in this deficit in c,
solving a long-standing mystery. Therefore our earth, which feels
I g, moves through Espace at a bit less than c! (Eq. 6-16).
As we elevate a body, its c-velocity (progress) increases just
enough to account for the kinetic energy gained when we drop it.
These relationships are made very clear by our time-arrow diagram
(Ch. 10).
Cell size and black holes
The Dual Space version of a black hole contrasts with current
theories. In Dual Space, intense gravity reduces the speed of
light toward zero, and the cell size stretches radially, rather
than not permitting light to escape and eating everything in
sight. Hawking [61 mentions that no black holes have really been
found yet.
General Relativity
General relativity predicts certain second order effects, such as
bending of light by the sun. (Ch. 16-20). Dual Space can account
for all of these in a straightforward manner simply based on the
change in c with gravity. For all of its complexity, general
relativity relies almost universally on the exercise of one
equation, the spherically symmetric Schwarzschild metric, that
computes distortions in 4-space.
Global Positioning Satellite
The Global Positioning Satellite (Ch.20) presents the most
visible test of relativity. This popular navigation tool has two
clocks in each of 12 satellites that require 4 relativistic
adjustments. Dual Space computations are far simpler than
relativity's with our time-arrow diagram. Both theories give
essentially identical results, but (Ch. 10, 20).
Pioneer 10: New problem, new solution for cosmos
The Pioneer 10 satellite, having been tracked for most of 30
years, has shown a small, inexplicable acceleration, Ap. In Ch.
13 we show that our gravity law accounts for half of Ap. The
other half is due to the Newtonian attraction of the mass of the
positrons formed during creation! The total mass of the universe
equals the mass of 70 sextillion stars (Suns), as reported by an
Australian team in July 2003. Modern physics cannot account for
the Pioneer 10 Ap anomaly, because they do not have the advantage
o f Dual Space' gravity law.
Electromagnetic Waves: a new view
An electromagnetic field E travelling in Espace will cause the
ep+ pairs in Espace to deflect (polarize) proportionally by
deflection 3. We propose (Ch. 24) that, additionally, the
electrons are also caused to orbit with radius 8 at their
resonant frequency Fres = 2.7x10^21 cps. The orbiting then
generates the exactly correct value of the corresponding H field.
All E and H values are evaluated from the example of a radio
station to verify the numbers. This view of the EM field is sure
to draw fire.
Birth and Growth of the Universe
Probably the most important development of Dual Space can be
found in Chapter 13, where my proposed model of our universe "...
is a universe created initially at the size of 118'h that of the
Sun, and which is increasing at the rate Mo' = c'^3/G = 102,000
suns (Solar Systems? ?)/second (!), to give us, after 11. 18
billion years, our present mass of 1.423x 10^53 kg!! This
universe is stable, with a constant Einstein-de Sitter = 1.
It is staggering to think that if even 0.001% of the new stars
held life, there would be one new solar system each second!!
Conclusion
In summary, we believe we are discerning the workings of a
Supreme Being indeed, dismissing the childish Big Bang
conjecture. We see stars constantly being dispatched at the speed
of light carrying a recipe to make 100+ elements, with our
universe duplicated as anti-particles in the new space. We see
physical laws as having their effect in Espace. We see gravity as
an environment, resulting from the deprivation during creation.
We see the original "birth" material expanding by 137 (= 1/alpha)
times and the (popcorn-like) expansion of Espace itself providing
the energy needed for continuous creation. We see that relativity
was a noble effort in the wrong coordinate system and that
efforts to develop quantum gravity are misguided. We begin to
sense that the artifices of quantum electrodynamics might be
rendered more intelligible with knowledge of the subspace A. The
simple dynamics of the e-p pair might finally solve the
renormalization problems of quantum electrodynamics. Other than
that, the aut hor was not ab le to make any progress in quantum
mechanics.
Dual Space actually introduces five new theories: New theory of
structure of space New theory of creation New theory of gravity
New theory of electromagnetic radiation New theory of cosmology
History has sadly confirmed that every new concept will be given
a harsh reception, as witness:
"It will be necessary first for the establishment to gradually
die off, so that a growing generation might learn its principles
from the beginning". Max Planck
We can only hope for better treatment!
A list of the new findings
Numerous new findings flow from this new view of the universe,
all of them supported by classical mathematics as follows:
Natural subdivision of space A Discovery of a new universe,
Espace The exact mechanism of the creation of our universe The
basic cause and equation for the "force" of gravity
Our gravity equation replacing General Relativity.
our universe speeding through time at the velocity of light
Time is absolute; there is no dilation.
Velocity of light diminishes in the presence of gravity
Space itself stretches in the presence of a mass
Clock speeds diminish in the presence of gravity
A source in gravity has low frequency, low c, normal X
Light does not lose energy even rising out of a potential well.
Renormalization facilitated by knowledge of smallest cell A
Energy of creation is mc^2 in two separate stages of formation.
Our universe depletes only 1/2,500,000th of Espace.
Our actions are automatically recorded for all time in Espace.
Only the act of creation makes gravity; energy does not.
All anti-particles are located in Espace.
Espace is the reservoir for Zero Point Energy.
The anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 is made clear.
Continuous creation replaces the Big Bang.
In a black hole, c would become zero and space would stretch
without limit, rather than that escape velocity should exceed c.
Mass Mo of created universe = 7.11x10^52 kg = 36 x 10^ 21 solar
masses.
Mass is being created continuously at the rate of 4x 10^35
kg/second
The initial universe had a diameter of 1.8x10^8m = 1/8th that of
our Sun and 30,000 times its mass.
(Note. The rest of the book is equally interesting with the
supporting mathematics and arguments. Well worth getting it. It
costs only less than $20 versus Dr. Yoon $200 book)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
- From: Morituri-|-Max
- Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
- From: bryant_j_j
- Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear Filaments?
- Next by Date: Examining Mathematical Approaches
- Previous by thread: The probability of winning a tennis set or match...
- Next by thread: Re: John Polasek "Dual Space" (real or imaginary??)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|