Punching
- From: "RichD" <r_delaney2001@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 Jun 2005 16:07:49 -0700
This question came up on a martial arts list.
You want to perform the standard right hand punch (with left foot
forward), as powerfully as possible. We consider two different
stances: right foot flat (pushing off the heel), or rising onto the
ball of the right foot.
Now imagine two scenarios:
a) You are attacking the opponent. The consensus is that rising is
superior, because it brings the calf muscles into play. Also, the
posture offers greater leverage (and reach).
b) Opponent is running toward you, probably to attempt a football
type tackle. Now some argue that heel down is preferable, because you
get a sturdier base (in the asian styles, they call this 'drawing
power from the earth'), and you really want to impale him, rather
than strike in the usual sense.
Now I argue that (b) should have the same solution as (a), using a
relativity argument. I.e. Force is force, momentum is momentum,
and the only that matters is relative motion; if (a) is stronger, it
should be stronger whether the opponent is standing still or in motion.
Thoughts? Is this debate amenable to physics analysis, or only
empirically?
--
Rich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Punching
- From: Mark Fergerson
- Re: Punching
- From: cnctut
- Re: Punching
- From: cnctut
- Re: Punching
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Re: Punching
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: Punching
- Prev by Date: Re: Etch A Sketch?
- Next by Date: parabolic shape test
- Previous by thread: Etch A Sketch?
- Next by thread: Re: Punching
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading