A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
- From: "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jun 2005 17:03:30 -0700
A
My topic line is the letter A. It is
a capital letter and is the first in
the alphabet.
As the first letter it deserves particular
attention, because as the first letters
are also the most often utilized.
"A" has a certain phonetic sound
associated. And the sound is thought
of coincident with the thinking of the
letter itself.
This is termed correspondent thinking.
And exact relation of the single sound
to the single symbol exists.
The term, relation, is introduced.
A relation of correspondence exists
in the mind whenever the cognition
occurs.
It is a uniquely existent real
relation.
And may be utilized in another fashion.
Consider the subject as the noun.
A certain thing is associated.
And the relation of one subject to
another is either a single one,
or given the never ending associated symbol
set or not.
And the logic, as the minimal set of
subject relations is defined.
Given a relation of correspondence,
another of either objective or subjective,
form may be postulated.
And here is the forms noun of the
old Greek School. All logics is the modern
defintion of the term, forms.
And the subjective and objective form
in relation to any logic is consider
definable.
A subjective relationship is a mind
subject. A relation of external
correspondence does not exist.
An objective relationship has the subject
in the sensory world.
While searching for the minimal inference,
a single relation applicable to only
objective subjects has been discovered.
And this is a relation of a single
kind. A one in the set of inferences.
This inference is considered a particular
basis of a logic.
A term basis, is introduced to define
the correspondence relation, in relation,
to any form of inference.
And so a school of logic is defined.
And the old Greek school is a rather
arbitrary member of the set of all
basis.
A term set, is defined. All inferences
in relation to all set members is
either a member of a set or not.
And here the inference is either an element
of the set or not.
To prove the elementability of the inference
is a school or logic associated task
or not.
Meaning the set is always in relation to
the form or not. Making the proof a relation
of correspondence to subject or not.
And the set itself is caused in relation
to only the number and not the correspondent
subject of the number.
So the school defines the set.
And the cause of the set is always in relation
to the form of the school.
Making Greek's set totaly distince from
other school's numbers.
So there you have it. Learn to read
Aristotle using the school's relation of
definition or not.
Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD uSA
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
- Prev by Date: Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
- Next by Date: A Living Space-Time...
- Previous by thread: Re: mathematician salaries
- Next by thread: Re: A or the Inference of the Greek School of Logic
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|