Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
- From: "Fred Chen" <flipsu5@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Jun 2005 23:47:04 -0700
Zigoteau wrote:
> Might I also recommend that you read R. Landauer, IBM J.
> Res. Dev. 1 (1951) 251, in connection with conductance quantization,
> which you do not appear to be up to speed with yet either.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Zigoteau.
In Landauer formalism, T~1 for conductive path, while T<<1 for barrier
path. Regardless of the transmission coefficient, it is the discrete
number of channels that causes the quantized behavior to be exhibited.
The conductance is basically a count of the channels.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
- Prev by Date: What does Planck's constant really mean?
- Next by Date: Re: A Living Space-Time...
- Previous by thread: Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
- Next by thread: Re: Nanotubes may have no temperature
- Index(es):