Re: A Living Space-Time...


"p6" <atomicp6@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1119245879.086448.299690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> macromitch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > p6 wrote:
> > > Space-time as ruled by relativity is depicted as being just mechanical
> > > and malleable.
> > >
> > > But what if it is a living entity.
> > >
> > > You aetherists keep on fighting on the semantic meaning of Aether
> > > and attempting to replace the standard definition of Aether to
> > > that of your choosing. Why do you keep fighting for the "Aether"
> > > term.
> > I'll tell you why.
> > Space-time is considered as just emptiness.
> > And how can emptiness curve?
> >
> > You gotta give it substance! ;->
>
> Yes, and the substance is flexible and ruled by the laws
> of relativity. This means there is no rest frame because
> the substance is part of the matter. Imagine there are
> nodes in the substance spaced by planck-like distance and
> when an em vector is moving, it is reaching out in between
> nodes giving the appearance of continuity.
>
> This substance could be 7D or higher dimensional in that
> it is also ruled by non-locality and other exotic properties.
> This can explain entangelent why time dilation can occur and
> why mass can be affected, etc. at relativistic speed.
>
> In other words, space-time is not emptiness but has substance.
> And the substance is not the aether but part of the
> relativistic space-time.
>
> Who disagrees with this concept and why??

I disagree with that concept. Why? It is way too complicated. A better
description is in the following link:
http://www.geocities.com/kn_seto/2005Unification.pdf

Ken Seto

>
> p6
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: A Living Space-Time...
    ... >> Space-time as ruled by relativity is depicted as being just mechanical ... >> You aetherists keep on fighting on the semantic meaning of Aether ... > Space-time is considered as just emptiness. ... and the substance is flexible and ruled by the laws ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
    ... > presumably, GTR as well) is an aether theory, ... ... Well, from ancient times the aether was a substance, not ... > prevailing math at the time, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: The Aether and Being
    ... Matter is then, ruled out. ... They are thanks to the aether they come from. ... philosophical rumbling is about what lies behind substance. ... Spacetime is a just product. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Vacuum - what is it?
    ... >> In the 1920's Einstein brought back the aether. ... >> You gotta give it substance!!! ... Particles, invisible forces, and emr ... > The most fundamental building block of this place is not a particle - ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Aether and the Trolls
    ... >> aether is a retarted non educated term ... > Empty space-time doesn't have substance. ... > The Aether does. ... is that to give "empty" space particles means nothing ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast