Re: Gravity and electricity
Puppet_Sock wrote:
John Sefton wrote:
Puppet_Sock wrote:
John Sefton wrote:
[snip]
How much energy is released every moment
by the million suns that make up a galaxy?
A lot, I'm sure. What's that got to do with
the topic of this thread?
Where does gravity come from?
Most matter is clumped in units called
galaxies. These galaxies are constantly
spraying emr everywhere.
That's energy out.
Where is the energy coming in?
As far as gravity goes, it is a truly minute perturbation.
Recall such things as the fact the Earth's orbit has been
relatively stable over some billions of years. Yet the
sun has been happily pumping out sunshine that entire time.
Also recall that the sun goes through various cycles
where its total output changes. The amount of energy
it puts out as electromagnetic radiation can change
significantly, while the Earth's orbit does not change
in any signficant way as a result.
Is it emr also?
A big part of the energy flowing away from stars is
in the form of electromagnetic radiation. At least
for the typical star that isn't losing much of its
material through ejecting massive particles. There
are some things like protons being ejected by our
sun, but again, it's a tiny fraction of the total
mass of the sun. And a few stars do go through stages
of ejecting large amounts of matter, some episodically,
others catastrophically such as supernovas.
That's two energy flows we have failed
to connect to the picture.
It's not that it has not been connected. It's that it's
too small to have any effect.
How many others are there?
The energy flowing from stars is, in most cases, a
minute fraction of the total mass of the star.
Notice that most stars have lifetimes in the millions
of years to billions of years range.
We are not going to find gravity by
staring at our navels; we must look at and
get a handle on the big picture.
Well, possibly. But starlight is a negligible fraction
of the total mass/energy in a galaxy at any given moment.
So, I'd say you have a worse handle on the "big picture"
than anybody else.
Socks
Let me try anyway.
The stars radiate. Neutron stars fall
into the BH. Plasma comes out to form new stars.
There has to be an energy flow *inward* from the
Universe to resupply the energy radiated. This
energy seems to be 'imported' somehow by the BH.
If you are keeping LeSage Theory
in mind, you need an inward flow of energy to be
being absorbed on a proton-by-proton basis.
Gravity/inertia explained. Now just pinpoint
the incoming energy source. You have the source of
gravity.
John
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Gravity and electricity
... > That's energy out. ... sun has been happily pumping out sunshine that entire time. ... A big part of the energy flowing away from stars is ... of the total mass/energy in a galaxy at any given moment. ...
(sci.physics) - Re: Unrenewable sun was "Hemel fuel depot explosion"
... Your post got me thinking about future energy use. ... removes fusion byproducts to extend the useful life of stars. ... Use of a solar battery converts a fraction of heat energy into ... our sun, which creates a residuum loss in the universe. ...
(rec.arts.sf.composition) - Re: Solar Shell
... The surface gravity of the sun is 27.9 gees. ... The only way to do this is to split it into lots of small stars. ... a shell 4 million miles across. ... The total energy radiated ...
(sci.space.policy) - Re: Owens Two-Phase Model of Earth Expansion
... There are many stars in our galaxy alone that are as old, ... >>same mass as the sun. ... Using its current amount of energy it is ...
(sci.geo.geology) - Re: Earth rotation
... you will stop right there as you are using the term 'mean sun' ... >is assume that axial rotation is constant wrt the Sun and apply the ... is to measure the elevation from the horizon of bright stars at sun ... >and uses the 24 hour clock to calculate the motion of a star back to ...
(sci.geo.geology) |
|
