Re: Time in physics
On 23 Jun 2005 00:20:58 -0700, "Orion" <danny99@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>What is time? Is time more fundamental than energy and matter?
>Physicists talk about time travel via closed timelike curves,
>wormholes, tachyons and warp drives. Are these things possible?
Time is the 4th dimension, but it's special in that our universe is
moving at the speed of light on it. It's how we sense time. We only
have now.
>From this principle of moving at c on the time dimension, we can get
all the results of relativity, but very easily. Dual Space theory
replaces relativity.
I have 10 papers on my website. Look at #2, Gravity.
John Polasek
http://www.dualspace.net
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: SR fundamental contradiction
... fundamental part of physics since at least the time of Newton. ... I don't reject Galilean relativity, ... What my transformation predicts is that a moving stick is contracted ... but forgetting that the rest frame remains S, ...
(sci.physics.relativity) - Re: SR fundamental contradiction
... fundamental part of physics since at least the time of Newton. ... I don't reject Galilean relativity, ... What my transformation predicts is that a moving stick is contracted ... when a moving clock shows a time ...
(sci.physics.relativity) - Re: Doppler effect
... of view it is moving toward you at x m/sec. ... relativity we still have a perfectly good object which might be called ... that's _not_ the closing velocity at measured in ... the rest frame of the sink, ...
(sci.physics) - Re: Problem with Einsteins Train Thought Experiment
... object is not moving directly towards the observer. ... There is no physics in the thought experiment. ... laws of motion take the same form in all inertial frames. ... relativity by asserting that all laws of physics take the ...
(sci.physics) - Re: "How Does Light Know How Fast to Travel?"
... Is that by him moving faster in the medium, ... Einstein stated that relativity 'puts forward no specific hypothesis' he at least understood that relativity lacks a credible theoretical structure having tried and failed to come up with one. ... By adopting the 'no aether doctrine' physics has probably ensured that it will never have a theoretical structure so physics has redefined itself to say that physical interpretation is an unnecessary adjunct to a mathematical model. ...
(sci.physics.relativity) |
|
