Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: Traveler <traveler@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 16:01:42 -0400
In article <zpCdneFjB5-2KiDfRVn-1Q@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Lefty" <Ye@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
>I'll explain it again because you asked about embeddedness.
>
>Most physicists think that the universe is made from this stuff known as
>Minkowski(3+1) spacetime.
>
>They are 1/2 right.
>
>In reality, the universe is a combination of two spaces which are intimately
>embedded within each other. You could think of it as R3 embedded in
>minkowski(3+1) spacetime. But I prefer to call it Minkowski(3+0) embedded in
>Minkowski(3+1).
Stupid ineducable idiot. Nothing move in spacetime. Conclusion: there
is no spacetime.
Louis Savain
The Silver Bullet: Why Software Is Bad and What We Can Do to Fix it
http://users.adelphia.net/~lilavois/Cosas/Reliability.htm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: Lefty
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- References:
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: mmeron
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: Lefty
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: Lefty
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: Lefty
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- From: Lefty
- Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- Prev by Date: Re: Will Radio Engineering be QM's worst nightmare?
- Next by Date: Re: Time in physics
- Previous by thread: Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- Next by thread: Re: Time is an illusion -- more on Lynds
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|