Re: Modelling Photoelectric Effect Without Photons

Manny wrote:
>
> In 1905. There is still no good model of the atoms. Why
> can't one say that as the frequency of the electromagnetic
> field increases, the electron orbital can no longer take the
> energy and so gets ejected from the atom. Why does it have to
> be a photon particle hitting the electron. What if the electron
> orbital can only accept certain energies in terms of the
> frequencies and when it exceed it, the electron orbital gets
> destructed resulting in the electron leaving the atom?
>
> Has anyone got an alternative atomic model whereby
> photoelectric effect can occur without using the concept
> of photon particles? For those who hate photons (like
> Dr. Richard Perry). You must come up with how the atomic
> can eject the electron by mere electromagnetic wave
> energy. This also goes for the compton scattering.

Hey stooopid, the Standard Model is good to 14 significant figures,
including the Lamb Shift from hydrogen to U(91)+. The whole of
physics and chemistry work exactly, without a single observed
exception or contradiction in any venue gas phase to solid state, you
idiot, from radio transitions (NMR, MRI) to deep gamma to TeV particle
accelerators. Now, jackass, tell us what in his awesome collection of
self-consistent perfection you find to be in need of "correction."

BTW, my digital wristwatch says this is 2005 not 1905. Why don't you
read the intervening century's refreed literature before you blow more
hot air out your ass.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

Relevant Pages
Quantcast