Re: Relativistic Nanogyroscope Array Gedanken
- From: "Ross A. Finlayson" <raf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Jul 2005 22:07:58 -0700
Hi,
I wonder more about the relativistic nanogyroscope array.
With circulating electrons, or holes, in a circuit, what that is is a
magnetic field, and the electrons move about there at variously high
rates of speed, but most of the time most of the electrons are just
moving back and forth.
So what I'm wondering about is if the force field system instead of the
rigid arm of the gimbal doesn't lead to the Ehrenfest problem, so that
the angular velocity at 1/2 c in tandem for relativistic effect is not
counter to accepted laws of physics.
It seems that where that is not the case, then, as is said, boom,
reactionless drive.
One notion in this conceptual device is the wave leader that guides the
particle mixer would itself be subject to something holding it as an
energetic or massy "particle", but then again that only requires more
energy.
There is some question of energy/mass equivalence accounting for the
increased mass of the system, but the energy within the system is
balanced. This is where various forms of energy that would accelerate
the particle instead contribute to the mass of the particle.
By the same token, the mass of the system is variable, and that leads
to, in the presence of any other body, varying interactions that do,
yes, appear to violate conservation of momentum, because gravity is
always on.
Ross
--
"Also, consider this: the unit impulse function times
one less twice the unit step function times plus/minus
one is the mother of all wavelets."
.
- Prev by Date: Re: experimental measurement of electron diameter?
- Next by Date: Re: A new equation to calculate non relativistic velocities of electrons
- Previous by thread: Deep Impact
- Next by thread: Deep Impact hits house on Comet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
