Re: Review: Engaging view of emergence
- From: "Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondouglas@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jul 2005 06:49:08 -0700
Sam Wormley wrote:
> Engaging view of emergence (Jul 6)
> http://physicsweb.org/article/review/18/7/1
>
> A Different Universe: Reinventing Physics from the Bottom Down
> Robert B Laughlin
> 2005 Basic Books 272pp
An emergence theory of science is the level
of analysis.
And to define science itself as always
simply "....."
And in the last sentence there is a
missing word because the book writer has a hard
time communicating the exact relationship
of one science to another.
And so the concept of the anti-reductionist
definition is apparently substituted.
Making the describer, a reductionist.
And so to merely state the behavior discovered
without seeking the simple relation of emergence
is the kind of scientific revolution discussed.
And here the concept of the natural relation
is introduced to warn the reader that classical
theory is also of the science the book writer
states.
A simple theory relation has the causality of
the emergent state. Making the complex
easily placed in theory.
Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USa
.
- References:
- Review: Engaging view of emergence
- From: Sam Wormley
- Review: Engaging view of emergence
- Prev by Date: Re: Crash exposes comet's inner secrets
- Next by Date: Re: Scientific Truth- becareful out there
- Previous by thread: Review: Engaging view of emergence
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|