Re: Stray Thoughts & Provocative Questions

"Mr. Knowitall" wrote:
>
> "Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:42D401CC.5518821@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> <SNIP>
>
> > Our debt to you is unquantifiable.
> >
> >
> <SNIP>
>
> > So sad... "light cone," schmuck.
> >
> >
> <SNIP>
>
> > Hey stoooopid: Time requires a clock. If you do not like
> > oscillators, use radioactive decay. If you do not like fragmenting
> > nuclei, use nuclear spin isomers.
> >
> <SNIP>
>
> > You are too fucking lazy to screw your leaden ass into a chair and get
> > educated.
> >
> >
> <SNIP>
>
> > Spare us the empty echoes. Go e-mail yourself.
> >
> > --
> > Uncle Al
>
> Thanks for the warm welcome and the deeply insightful and valuable comments.
> Every newsgroup has at least one ignorant fucking ***. I guess that
> would be *you*...so far.
>
> I realize that this forum is inhabited by a lot of academics, intellectuals
> and professional experts in a wide variety of scientific disciplines...and
> that in all likelihood they vastly exceed my relatively puny intellect. Am I
> being humble enough yet...or am I expected to kiss your ass as the price of
> admission? The universe will suffer death by heat loss long before that
> event is likely to occur.
>
> I posted some of my thoughts and questions in the hope that I would be able
> to engage in a civilized and friendly discussion with some intelligent
> people that are more
> knowledgeable than myself about certain things that I find interesting.
> Maybe that's an unreasonable expectation in today's world.
>
> I didn't come here to be *** upon by kooks and miserable pricks...which I
> now see this group has an abundance of. If you don't like my post, then just
> pretend it never happened...then go *** yourself.

"I realize that this forum is inhabited by a lot of academics,
intellectuals and professional experts in a wide variety of scientific
disciplines..."

Maybe you realize that science is not a bonehead English essay. We
have standards of rigor, internal self-consistency, and empirical
validation. You are blowing it out of your ass. Badly.

Uncle Al is a physics autodidact. His proposed challenge to one of
General Relativity's founding postulates is currently running in PR
China. When you get an academic physics group to take in outside
laundry, give us a ring. In the meanwhile, remember how John
Ehrlichman described former FBI Director L. Patrick Gray.

Mark Hopkins is not a professional physicist either. He invested the
time and effort to know stuff. What is your excuse for loud
refractory ignorance? Oh, wait... it is your right! You are a
diversity admission to sci.physics along with myriad other
intellectual slum bunnies.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

Quantcast