Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- From: "Mr. Knowitall" <ir911@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 14:41:22 -0400
"tj Frazir" <GravityPhysics@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:16361-42D935DF-236@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> We can not see past 96 % c.
> I said 96 % C is as far as can be seen in any direction WRT moving
> gallaxy.
> Im over your head again and you have the same responce you had with the
> idia we know how far the stars have gone .
>
> Then you fail to seperate speculation from the facts.
> They think """ they saw near the BB but thats rearted.
> Hubbles law is the farthest away is the fastest
> but if its going faster than c we cant see it.
> BY math observation the ege of the universe
> has gallaxys going c .
> Thats the ege of our visible universe.
>
> Then wrt the observer on the gallaxy receading at C at the ege of te
> universe we are at the ege of the universe going C and it can look the
> oposit direction and see its other ege maybe 14 billion years on the
> other side of it andthat galaxy dont exsist to our time demention.
> That galaxy is 28 bly away from us going twce the speed of light wrt us.
>
> You said I could not think of whats beond time and space . You said I
> could not know or comprehend whats outside the universe.
>
> You claimed ( based on your ignorant arogance ) that I was stupid and
> did not understand what I was talking about !!
>
> Now Im over your head again.
> Im dropping math based idias on you and you wount get this one from the
> book.
>
> NO idia can be any less than identical to conservation.
> THEN if the universe hubble constant
> and einstein is corect then.
> The stars at the ege of the universe going c have infinet mass and
> forms the wall of the ege of the universe ,,,but if your on that star we
> are at the ege ofthe iniverse and its wall.
>
> At the same time there is no wall and the things past the ege of our
> universe dont even exsist.
> that does not make an energy exchange imposible.
> 1986
> now what are we talking about ???
> Things you think we cant think about !
> OR idias your ignorant of ????
> They are well argued subjects and not new ones. yet your in shock to
> hear of these idias ad think Im a stupid fool for discussing idias and
> arguing them from boath sides.
> That means to me Im hurting your brain hard.
> Standing at the ege of the laws of physics things get hard for a
> dumbass like you to understand.
> And I know a dumbass will react offencive at anything he dont
> understand befor anyone sees he dont understand.
>
> Im not using hard words ,,you just dont want to understand. you know I
> use C and c with the same value and you use it for an excuse when ever
> you dont understand me.
> MOE is the math on evrything.
> then my idias are not limited to any book.
> My idia can stand on the star at the ege of the universe going c when
> we can only see to 96 % hubble . I would be stading outside the limit of
> time ad matter past 96 % c.
>
> Im now using te speed of light as a distance.
> c is 15.9 billion years off the top of my head with out y calculator.
> Y is allways answerd with y calculator .
> You said c is a speed not a distance but math says its interchangable.
> hubble constant given distance give me the speed. OR I give you the
> speed and use it for distance.
> So why cant I express c as distance to the ege of the universe
> ??????????????
> did the idia hurt your head and you said c is a speed and not a
> distance and you insist I not hurt your head ???????????????
> And further more ,,you assume I dont understand all the idias of the
> BB.
> You stated we can not talk about what was befor the BB or outside the
> universe.
> You said we dont have the tools to do so.
> I got the sharpest tools in the shed .
> MOE
>
>
WOW! I can't help feeling seriously alarmed that human minds like this
actually exist. This character easily earns my nomination as one of the most
profound lunatics anywhere on the Internet.
This self-proclaimed freakin' genius hasn't even got a proper goddamn
connection to the Net. Microsoft should be shot & pissed on for unleashing
WebTV on the world. Fisher-Price could have done it better, but had the
*decency* to not inflict such a sinister plague on the world. It's like
supplying a million monkeys with fkn machine-guns and hand-grenades...and
then setting them loose to maraud the planet at will.
This pathetic creature has about as much knowledge of physics as my ass has
about chewing bubblegum...and is a prime example of misallocated matter,
time & space.
"If man evolved from apes, why do we still have apes?"
--Stephen Wright--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- From: T Wake
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- References:
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- From: T Wake
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- From: tj Frazir
- Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- Prev by Date: Re: Inertial frames of reference
- Next by Date: Re: hello NASA, Lockheed Stocks and ripping off
- Previous by thread: Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- Next by thread: Re: Big Bang or Big Splat? 96 % c in our reality but
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
