The 'Real Electron' is not a point-particle

THE 'REAL ELECTRON' IS NOT A POINT-PARTICLE.

By Louis Nielsen http://www.rostra.dk/louis

The established theory of so-called elementary particles is not a
physical theory about the 'real particles'. It is only an accepted
mathematical model where it is assumed that lepton particles are
so-called 'point-particles' without physical extensions. For
example it is assumed that the electron is a 'point-particle'
without extension and without an interior structure. To describe the
observed phenomena of electrons, the 'point-electrons' had been
given the 'pseudo-physical' quantities like 'mass', 'electric
charge', 'spin' and 'lepton-number'.
The mathematical model of elementary particles can describe many of the
observed phenomena, but it is obviously not a theory intending to
describe and explain the real and true nature of the so-called
elementary particles. The model of the 'elementary-particles' is
like the mathematical model of an ideal gas, where the
'gas-particles' are 'mathematical point-particles' without
geometrical extensions. But if we associate masses and velocities to
the 'mathematical point-particles', then the 'Ideal Gas Law'
can describe the behaviour of real gasses with a good approximation.

I postulate that the 'real electron' has an interior
quantum-dynamical structure and that it has a physical average
extension. In the next section I derive that the average extension of
the 'real electron' is about 10^(-18) meter.

CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE ELECTRON, THE PROTON AND THE UNIVERSE
Are there connections between the electron, the proton and the
Universe? My answer is yes.
My postulate is that there exists a connection between the average
mass-density of an electron and the average mass-density of the
Universe. A similar connection exists between the average mass-density
of a proton and the average mass-density of the Universe. The
mathematical connections are given by the equations:

(1) (m(e)/r(e)^3) = N(e)*(M/R^3)

and

(2) (m(p)/r(p)^3) = N(p)*(M/R^3)

In equation (1) m(e) = 9.11*10^(-31) kg is the rest mass of the
electron and r(e) is the average extension of the electron. In equation
(2) m(p) = 1.67*10^(-27) kg is the rest mass of the proton and r(p) is
the average extension of the proton.
M is the total mass of the Universe and R is the actual average
extension of the Universe.
N(e) is equal to the ratio between the electrostatic and gravitostatic
forces between two electrons. N(p) is equal to the ratio between the
electrostatic and gravitostatic forces between two protons.
N(e) and N(p) are defined by:

(3) N(e) = ((k*e^2)/(G*m(e)^2) = 4.16*10^42


(4) N(p) = (k*e^2/G*m(p)^2) = 1.24*10^36

In equation (3) and (4) k is Coulomb's constant and e is the electric
charge of the electron. G is the actual value of Newton's
gravitational 'constant'. We assume that k, e, m(e), m(p) and M are
constants. G is assumed to decrease with increasing R. (See my
treatise)

>>From other equations in my treatise about Quantum Cosmology the values
of R and M can be calculated. The actual values are:
R = 10^26 meter and M = 1.6*10^60 kg.
>>From equations (1) and (2) we can then calculate the values of
r(e) and r(p):

(5) r(e) = R*(m(e)/(N(e)*M))^(1/3) = 0.5*10^(-18) meter

and

(6) r(p) = R*(m(p)/(N(p)*M))^(1/3) = 0.9*10^(-15) meter

The calculated average extensions of the electron and the proton are in
very good agreement with measured values!

>>From equation (1) and (2) we get a simple connection between the masses
and extensions of the electron and the proton:

(7) m(e)/r(e) = m(p)/r(p)

or:

(8) m(p)/m(e) = r(p)/r(e) = 1836

An electron (or a proton) is not a rigid system. The electron is a
quantum-dynamical system composed of a huge number of (yet unknown)
very tiny quanta.

According to equation (7) an electron have possible a 'disc-shape'.


A question: Are similar equations as the above valid also for other
'elementary particles'?

Read more in my treatise:

http://www.rostra.dk/louis/

Serious comments to the above considerations are very welcome.

Best regards Louis Nielsen, Denmark

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Real Electron is not a point-particle
    ... For example it is assumed that the electron is a 'point-particle' without extension and without an interior structure. ... like the mathematical model of an ideal gas, where the 'gas-particles' are 'mathematical point-particles' without geometrical extensions. ... Are there connections between the electron, the proton and the ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: English Prime ( E-Prime [To Exist or Not to Exist])
    ... How would the varying temporal extension denotation be used to interpret the ... The electron appears as a wave when measured with instrument-l. ... John appears lethargic and unhappy in the office. ... The car involved in the hit-and-run accident was a blue Ford. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: The Real Electron is not a point-particle
    ... For example it is assumed that the electron is a 'point-particle' without extension and without an interior structure. ... The mathematical model of elementary particles can describe many of the observed phenomena, but it is obviously not a theory intending to describe and explain the real and true nature of the so-called elementary particles. ... The model of the 'elementary-particles' is like the mathematical model of an ideal gas, where the 'gas-particles' are 'mathematical point-particles' without geometrical extensions. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: The Real Electron is not a point-particle
    ... >> THE 'REAL ELECTRON' IS NOT A POINT-PARTICLE. ... >> without extension and without an interior structure. ... >> The mathematical model of elementary particles can describe many of the ... THE PROTON AND THE UNIVERSE ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Particles as Energetic Bits of Fields
    ... which is described by the wave equations of the electron. ... below in the "2" Griffin mentions: ... Griffiths "Introduction to Elementary Particles" which has ...
    (sci.physics)
Quantcast