Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- From: "T Wake" <taswakeAt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 19:48:17 +0100
"David Thomson" <news5@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:42dd2ff8$1_2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Since you associate mass with matter, then you have indeed implied
> particles have the escape velocity to get out of a black hole.
How and when have I done either of these?
> Actually, yes. If you are going to tell us your great understanding of
> black holes, whether you learned it from Hawkings or your own common
> sense, then you need to explain your position. Merely saying that someone
> developed a theory about black holes, and his name is Mighty Stephen
> Hawkings, more resembles religious worship than science.
Obviously you have chosen to read a limited amount of posts on this matter
and have, for whatever reason, chosen to make a few assumptions. At no stage
have I implied I "worship" either Stephen Hawking or his theories regarding
black holes. I have responded to Nick's questions where he has shown a
marked lack of understanding about either and then made statements which are
generally self-contradictory.
Feel free to visit http://groups.google.com and read through some of the
older messages on this topic.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- References:
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- From: T Wake
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- From: T Wake
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- Prev by Date: Re: The Deep Impact of Temple 1
- Next by Date: All stars have spin!
- Previous by thread: Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- Next by thread: Re: Mass is mass. It dont leak
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|