Re: Noise Theory of Existence



Ken S. Tucker wrote:
> Tim Golden wrote:
> > The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
> > > >>>"ACK! THBBFT!"
> > > > Just guessing, but I think it is the sound you produce when a fly
> > > > lands in your mouth.
> > > Actually, it is the traditional sound of an orange tabby with
> > > a *very* bad hairdo in Berke Breathed's works. (His name was
> > > Bill the Cat. However, your interpetation works to an extent... :-) )
> > Rah Rah Rah!
> > You guys are villians, not physicists.
> > What ever happened to the open minded physicist who considers an
> > argument and counters it with wholehearted enthusiasm?
> > True physicists are openminded.
> > You only demonstrate your lack thereof.
> >
> > Come on guys.
> > You know that the random component is there.
> > -Tim
>
> Hi Tim
> The past and present are causal the future is
> probalistic and random, like a lottery ticket.
> A few numbers on scrap paper could change your
> life, but the law of conservation of energy
> still holds.
Hi Ken.
Nice to hear from you.
I almost put something down on your spring proton model just last
night.
I was wondering if that spring frequency is universal for all protons.
And then that suggests a sort of grand inherent resonance.

I am not trying to destroy conservation of energy.
Doesn't the big bang model pose that problem?
How much energy does the universe contain?
Surely not zero.
Oh yeah and the big bang created space-time also right?
Where is the derivation of that?
Just a bit of hand waving because we don't really need to question that
do we?

Rather than an energy source in this noise I am just posing a basis.
The noise is really just informational. Energy hopefully develops a few
layers up.
Still you could look at it(the noise) as a food. Just a different form.
A dithering that stability develops on top of. It's pretty abstract but
it's worth a try. Hell, anything's worth a try over buying into all of
this modern stuff. So flipping a few things upside down is probably
necessary to get a cleaner result. I suppose a noise model isn't even
really all that new. Quantum stuff uses a background of
creation/annihilation right? Ether theories that were thought to be old
and dead still arise on this group.

Along with a derivation of space-time something more must be granted.
Noise is one such option.

-Tim

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Math & physics.
    ... In a certain way, if matter simply never ceases "to exist" this demands a continuous flow of time, not discrete. ... These time discussions also show how the QM physicists have completely misunderstood their own UP. ... The QM people say the time it takes for a physical system to change energy is *itself,* in the *external world,* stochastic. ... Is this non-zero Tuv from the electromagnetic field that, say, a rotating charged central ball of matter itself generates, and then "fills the space" surrounding it? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Math & physics.
    ... Where does all the matter "go" during these ... These time discussions also show how the QM physicists have completely misunderstood their own UP. ... the temporal resolution of some damn clock used by *us* to quantify how much time it takes the system to change energy. ... These people *do not* understand the simple concept of measurement error. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: what is the relation between force and energy?
    ... >> is twice the ionization energy of the electron in the ground state. ... circular motion involves no work to be performed. ... acting perpendicularly to the direction of motion of the orbiting body). ... if even one physicists dared stand up, turn his back to the oggling ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Expanding Space
    ... physicists. ... What carries away the energy? ... > distortion of spacetime, spacetime must be ... > whether that complies with your philosophy or not. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Expanding Space
    ... physicists. ... What carries away the energy? ... > distortion of spacetime, spacetime must be ... > whether that complies with your philosophy or not. ...
    (sci.astro)
Quantcast