sci.physics

• Thread Index

---

• Re: The Reality of Time
  • From: Traveler
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: NunYa Bidness
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: briggs
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Reality of Time
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Foreign atoms trigger superconductivity in carbon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Chirality and parity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tsunami, nuclear firepower, and shattering the moon
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: PD
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: NunYa Bidness
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The Big Bang is not just a theory
  • From: dirkbontes
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Reality of Time
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• "Defining Inertial and Gravitational Accelerations"
  • From: Sme
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: 2ndPostulateDude
• Re: The Reality of Time
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: TomGee
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Hurricane Katrina levee is stupid biult by idiots
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: Androcles
• The Reality of Time
  • From: Lucas Hyde
• Re: Probability Amplitudes and Black Holes
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Hurricane Libby 10 days away is a MONSTER and 1/2
  • From: NunYa Bidness
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Relativity question.
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: India designs thorium reactor
  • From: Bob Cain
• We never said they gave negative results, and they did not in fact give negative results (Miller 1926)
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al
  • From: hanson
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: RP
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: READ THIS! I'm Glad I did! This pertains to this
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Externet
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: M31
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: RP
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• How to calculate the force ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: Hurricane Libby 10 days away is a MONSTER and 1/2
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: RP
• Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Earth Core Rotating Faster
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How do I short real estate before the bubble pops?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al
  • From: NunYa Bidness
• Re: Relativity question.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Relativity question.
  • From: Albion
• Re: Does the earth slow down? BUSTED# 100 : )
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Hurricane Libby impact in 10 days Evryone look
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Tsunami, nuclear firepower, and shattering the moon
  • From: Mark Martin
• hanson, a chip off the old block
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: tony fleming
• READ THIS! I'm Glad I did! This pertains to this
  • From: billyboyer
• Foreign atoms trigger superconductivity in carbon
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sprinkler cools dog days...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Does the earth slow down? BUSTED# 100 : )
  • From: the softrat
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Perpetual Motion
  • From: jimp
• Re: Chirality and parity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: RP
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: magnetic monopoles
  • From: RP
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
  • From: muser
• magnetic monopoles
  • From: muser
• Re: Perpetual Motion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the earth slow down? BUSTED# 100 : )
  • From: muser
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the earth slow down? BUSTED# 100 : )
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Robert J. Kolker
• Re: Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Does the earth slow down?
  • From: Douglas Manning
• Re: Hurricane Katrina and another on the way
  • From: tj Frazir
• Tsunami, nuclear firepower, and shattering the moon
  • From: rubyhacker
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al
  • From: hanson
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: spring vibrations in space
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: Nick
• Re: Sprinkler cools dog days...
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: fucking dumbasses dont know any physics and post shit
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Hurricane Katrina bugging out thoughts
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Probability Amplitudes and Black Holes
  • From: Mike Speed
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: nightlight
• Re: Is Photon a Point Particle?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Found a photo of Uncle Al
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Zeb Glittering
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: 2ndPostulateDude
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: John Sefton
• Found a photo of Uncle Al
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: nightlight
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stei
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: The Ether is the past
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 743 August 29, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Chirality and parity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• "Is General Relativity Compatible With Special Relativity?"
  • From: Levart
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Itax payers GAVE 4,000 USD this year.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Chirality and isotropy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: jimp
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: My user Ult fucking PC dumbass
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions
  • From: tj Frazir
• Motion Through Space Is Meaningful
  • From: 2ndPostulateDude
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium.
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Sprinkler cools dog days...
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Zeb Glittering
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: The Ether is the past
  • From: |-|erc
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Red Shift Claim
  • From: Dr Nanduri
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium.
  • From: Dr Nanduri
• Re: The Ether is the past
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The Ether is the past
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The Ether is the past
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Zeb Glittering
• Re: The Ether is the past
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• The Ether is the past
  • From: |-|erc
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: speed of gravity
  • From: special
• Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: spring vibrations in space
  • From: Monitek
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: donstockbauer
• Synthetic Telepathy and Electromagnetic Warfare
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Is Photon a Point Particle?
  • From: Orion
• Is Photon a Point Particle?
  • From: sonny
• Re: spring vibrations in space
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Chirality and parity
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Sprinkler cools dog days...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• Photon Splitting Inquiry
  • From: Potte
• Re: Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: rhvp65
• Re: Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: rhvp65
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium.
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: speed of gravity
  • From: Traveler
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: speed of gravity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: newton's first law
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Dr Photon
• "Fact and Fiction in Cosmology", a public lecture at the Cal State Northridge planetarium.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: the softrat
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: The Big Bang is not just a theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Moc
• "Are Unified Field Theories Justified?"
  • From: Moc
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: Boris Mohar
• Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Uncle Al re magnet wire
  • From: Ian Macmillan
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Potte
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Media blows harder than Hurricane Katrina
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Hurricane Katrina Wolf Wolf Wolf lies media
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: India designs thorium reactor
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 29, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: speed of gravity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• The penis is way too delicate for masturbation
  • From: dgr140
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: speed of gravity
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Intersection Theory of Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: The Big Bang is not just a theory
  • From: RP
• The Big Bang is not just a theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: The Big Bang is not just a theory
  • From: Nick
• Re: speed of gravity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• The Big Bang is not just a theory
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• speed of gravity
  • From: special
• Re: Hurricane Katrina 20,000 sq miles of farms flood 2005
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Hurricane Katrina 8 cities north underwater friday BIBLICAL flood
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Hurricane Katrina 1000 mile flood 2005 record expected
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT and entanglement
  • From: Potte
• Re: Hurricane Katrina cat 2 tornado 30 miles wide floods usa 1000 mi
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand
  • From: tony fleming
• SFT and entanglement
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: the softrat
• Re: News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope
  • From: Mike
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Richard Dawkins's logic troubles
  • From: musil23
• Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions TAO Jesica sank
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks
  • From: srp
• Re: Hurricane Katrina Comments and Questions
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: Mark Martin
• newton's first law
  • From: francisco
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Three Little Known Amazing Observations by Three Great Inventors
  • From: Androcles
• Three Little Known Amazing Observations by Three Great Inventors
  • From: rk73737
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: John Sefton
• Science Equipment ID needed
  • From: R.H.
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: T Wake
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: what is mind ???
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: what is mind ???
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: question 1
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: FUCK YOUR SHIT GET OUT
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: donstockbauer
• "The Matter of "Dark Matter"
  • From: Cino
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Stochastic Processes: Gaussian, Second-Order, etc.
  • From: OsherD
• Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand
  • From: AlexG
• Re: Another Afrimax tanker in distress gulf DUR993
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what is mind ???
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Continuous Verbal Knowledge and Continuous Universe
  • From: OsherD
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• News regarding NASA's Webb Space Telescope
  • From: Mike
• Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: spring vibrations in space
  • From: AJW
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: what is mind ???
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: a simple dynamic problem consultion
  • From: srp
• Re: what is mind ???
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Motion consists of two kinds
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Red Shift Claim
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: spring vibrations in space
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Zeb Glittering
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Zeb Glittering
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: what is mind ???
  • From: Androcles
• Re: UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!
  • From: Billinares
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• spring vibrations in space
  • From: Bernhard Kuemel
• UNCERTAiNTY Principle REDUNDANT.!!
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• what is mind ???
  • From: Udayan
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Free XBox, PS2, Ipods or gift certificates.....NO Referals Needed
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• maxwell's eqns and self-fields
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Quantum Complex Stochastics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Quantum Complex Stochastics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: question 1
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Reaching planck's energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: M31
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: M31
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: M31
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Another billion dollar idea!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Physicists in Germany have created a material that is harder than diamond
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Does the strength of a magnet fall off at a greater rate than gravity?
  • From: M31
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Reaching planck's energy
  • From: Orion
• Re: neutrino wave question
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Quantum Complex Stochastics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• a simple dynamic problem consultion
  • From: idyllic . math
• Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A few questions about string theory
  • From: Nick
• Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?
  • From: tj Frazir
• A few questions about string theory
  • From: cyberdude
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: question 1
  • From: francisco
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Potte
• Re: question 1
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Akira Bergman
• question 1
  • From: francisco
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Simple Bernoulli question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Mike
• Re: Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: jimp
• Complex Probabilities 2: Exotic Probabilities, Quantum Logic Relationships
  • From: OsherD
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
  • From: Lecnac
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Why the Universe Exists
  • From: Zeb Glittering
• simple question about heat conductivity
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Complex Probabilities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Timothy Golden http://www.BandTechnology.com
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Complex Probabilities
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumbfucks
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Complex Probabilities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Chirality and isotropy
  • From: T Wake
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: peter
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Complex Probabilities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Complex Probabilities
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Nick
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: tj Frazir
• Acceleration using ticker timer
  • From: jamesy123
• Ultrathin films of ice observed at room temperature
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 26 August 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: jimp
• Re: United Nations moving to China!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How to make blue light?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Reaching planck's energy
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Potte
• Reaching planck's energy
  • From: Orion
• Re: Go to alt fucking stupid asses
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Take this bullshit 1000 post of worthless crap
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumbfucks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumbfucks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Take this bullshit outa here dumbfucks
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Potte
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• How to make blue light?
  • From: Jim Spriggs
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Potte
• About 5% of the proton's magnetic moment comes from strange quarks
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Chirality and isotropy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: household physics question
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Nick
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand
  • From: the softrat
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Orion
• Re: What is the "reason" C is constant to all observers?
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: dbohara
• Re: H numbers
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Orion
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Potte
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: jimp
• Re: H numbers
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Potte
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: jimp
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Potte
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Potte
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: dbohara
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Potte
• Re: household physics question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: household physics question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: International Space Agency
  • From: Weatherlawyer
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 26 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Physicists in Germany have created a material that is harder than diamond
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Conservative Scientists Push New Theory of Intelligent Falling in Schools
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Androcles
• Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: household physics question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: India designs thorium reactor
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: household physics question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: household physics question
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: John Sefton
• Dimensionality And The Multiple Reality Context
  • From: Tim Golden
• Re: household physics question
  • From: crowsmengegus
• Re: household physics question
  • From: crowsmengegus
• Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: Robert Kolker
• International Space Agency
  • From: Victoria
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: John Sefton
• household physics question
  • From: at
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: neutrino wave question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Bohrn again
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: What are these symbols in this formula?
  • From: curiousjohn4
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly
  • From: smurrish
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims,...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: neutrino wave question
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: neutrino wave question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Smokers are deep thinkers. junkies hane no self_control.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
• Re: "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Mark Martin
• "Examining Mathematical Approaches"
  • From: Yrots
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: michaeld
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: PD
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: PD
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: michaeld
• Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS
  • From: Dr Photon
• Question on relativity, time dilation and a couple of clocks
  • From: kasterborus
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: michaeld
• Re: GRAVITY AND RADIATION MECHANICS
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Critical breakthrough
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Best universities for Physics degrees in Australia or New Zealand
  • From: AlexG
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication
  • From: OsherD
• Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless
  • From: meltedown
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Tim Golden
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication
  • From: OsherD
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Tim Golden
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Androcles
• Mechanical (Probable) Causation Uses Subtraction and Division, Not Addition or Multiplication
  • From: OsherD
• neutrino wave question
  • From: special
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: Androcles
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims,...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Nuclear missile blueprint!!!!
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Tracking uranium.
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tj Frazir
• I have again answered Dr. Alan Sokal's challenge ("the Sokal hoax")
  • From: musil23
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: tdp1001
• Critical breakthrough
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Critical breakthrough
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: dbohara
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Nick
• Lookin fer a fizisist
  • From: dbohara
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: boo
• Re: Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degre...
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Justification of a (flat) space-time metric
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: [More on: part 3] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Debating Uncertainty uncertainly
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Smokers are deep thinkers. junkies hane no self_control.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Chirality and isotropy dumbass Unkie Alice
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Debating Uncertainty uncertainly
  • From: smurrish
• Re: Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degre...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Debating Uncertaintity uncertainly...
  • From: smurrish
• Earth's inner core is rotating faster by about 0.3 to 0.5 degrees per year
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Critical breakthrough
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Chirality and isotropy dumbass Unkie Alice
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Justification of a (flat) space-time metric
  • From: Androcles
• Justification of a (flat) space-time metric
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: markwh04
• Re: H numbers
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: CWatters
• Re: entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: Ian Parker
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: Richard Henry
• entropy of the pre-big-bang medium?
  • From: Evgenij Barsukov
• Help me with this real life story problem
  • From: jackjohansson
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: Dr. Zarkov
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Richard Miller
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Richard Miller
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless
  • From: Richard Miller
• Re: The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: michaeld
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• The Jupiter Boosted Sun Escape
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Bob Berman: String Theory's trendy, but baseless
  • From: meltedown
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Orion
• I have made Einstein's 1925 writings on the Bose-Einstein condensate available as 1 indexed pdf file for download.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Induction cookers
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: United Nations moving to China!
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Pup
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Gravity Probe B guy promoted to NASA associate administrator
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Conservative Scientists
  • From: T Wake
• Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -
  • From: T Wake
• Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats
  • From: T Wake
• Check out "Weird pictures will fool you" in alt.binaries.pictures.misc
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• photon's substructure, the wave-particle duality, and quantum solutions
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited.....
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: jtuzo
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• [More on: part 3] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: mmeron
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Y.Porat
• material coherence: approximation for large n where n is the number of atoms
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited.....
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited.....
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited.....
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• The Smart Atomic Model Silicon Atom Revisited.....
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: the softrat
• Re: How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Nick
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Greysky
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Nick
• How Does a Planet 'Capture' a Satellite
  • From: the softrat
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Lost Causes By King's College's Streater v.s. PI
  • From: OsherD
• Lost Causes By King's College's Streater v.s. PI
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Conservative Scientists
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Cradle of Creation
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: Potte
• Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Who I'd like to hire to put oars on boats
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: H numbers
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Induction cookers
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Tracking uranium.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: tj Frazir
• H numbers
  • From: Akira Bergman
• Re: Could the universe be older and bigger than we can see?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Gravity Probe B guy promoted to NASA associate administrator
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: tony fleming
• New Paper: Magnetic Monopoles and Duality Symmetry Breaking in Maxwell's Electrodynamics
  • From: Jay R. Yablon
• Re: test
  • From: John Zinni
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: hanson
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Nick
• Yet another entropy paradox...
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Tracking uranium.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Traveler - Insane or Genius?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• SFT is a quantized field, QFT is a classical 'field'
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Earn 12% daily of your investment!!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: Charles
• Re: Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: jtuzo
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Traveler
• Entanglement says space is illusion, what maintains the illusions?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Single Atom Double Slit Experiment
  • From: Potte
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 11
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity
  • From: CWatters
• Re: pressure dependence of thermal conductivity
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 11
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10
  • From: Uncle Al
• test
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: curses
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Uncle Al
• Is Bohm Hidden Variables discredited or not? How?
  • From: Potte
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Police Armor Penetration Loading- I found this
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is empty space made of dark energy at c
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: footballdvds
• Re: curses
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: What is empty space made of dark energy at c
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: michaeld
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: curses
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: Martin
• Re: Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Pressure as a measure of capacity
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Who I'd like to hire
  • From: PD
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: PD
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: What is empty space made of
  • From: Traveler
• What is empty space made of
  • From: footballdvds
• pressure dependence of thermal conductivity
  • From: Max Hofmann
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The truth is meant to be known
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Gnak
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile
  • From: CWatters
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• From today's (8-24-05) Des Moines Register -- Stick to Science, ISU
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Police Armor Penetration Loading- I found this
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Who I'd like to hire
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The truth is YOUR ALL FUCKING STUPID
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tony fleming
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tfleming1
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Fibres control the speed of light
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Bohmians/Modified Bohmians Admit rho = /w/^2 Often False
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: ectoplasm
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: Nick
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Who I'd like to hire
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: ectoplasm
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: J. Horta
• Calc. angle between two azimuth values
  • From: ectoplasm
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: astroboy
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: Nick
• Re: Gravity as Falling Space + Reward
  • From: tj Frazir
• Injudiciousness, Einstein and Scientifically Inaccurate Claims
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Dirac and the aether postulate
  • From: mountain man
• Re: I'm an anti_junkie.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: I'm an anti_junkie.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The truth is YOUR ALL FUCKING STUPID
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: The Mysterious Dark Energy
  • From: mountain man
• Re: experiment with fluids
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: the softrat
• Re: ^ drag force on an object on an automobile
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tfleming1
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Who I'd like to hire
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: experiment with fluids
  • From: Uncle Al
• ^ drag force on an object on an automobile
  • From: aguy
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: experiment with fluids
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tfleming1
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The moment is all anyone ever had.
  • From: T Wake
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: tfleming1
• Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: The moment is all anyone ever had.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The truth is YOUR ALL FUCKING STUPID
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Lens Fabrication
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Proper Time
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity Probe B
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• experiment with fluids
  • From: Tony Johansson
• Gravity Probe B
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Proper Time
  • From: Nick
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe -
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Shadow Universe Trespasses
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Lens Fabrication
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington,DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Lens Fabrication
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Who I'd like to hire
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Lens Fabrication
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Who I'd like to hire
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Who I'd like to hire
  • From: dbohara
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: mike3
• Need help on "Basic" concept
  • From: astroboy
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: PD
• A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 8
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Fibres control the speed of light
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: LIGO is coming into operation in stages
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• LIGO is coming into operation in stages
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The Republican War Against Science (A New Book)
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Igor
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: What are these symbols in this formula?
  • From: yotango
• Re: The moment is all anyone ever had.
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: The moment is all anyone ever had.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Thanks was Re: Noble gasses in windows
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Lens Fabrication
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7
  • From: Androcles
• A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 7
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Where can I buy a half silvered mirror?
  • From: kasterborus
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Sserdda
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Lens Fabrication
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Lens Fabrication
  • From: Camilo
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: feuerbac
• Re: Thermal Inductance
  • From: AJW
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: m1ngleg02
• Re: [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• [More on: part 2] Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: flames
• Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: ozone formation
  • From: Zdenek Sperling
• Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason)
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thermal Inductance
  • From: s.morra
• Re: What are these symbols in this formula?
  • From: yotango
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: George
• Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Nuclear transformation energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The truth is meant to be known
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The truth is meant to be known
  • From: Nick
• Re: Another Vietnam/Iraq Parallel (GOP, The Party of Treason)
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The truth is YOUR ALL FUCKING STUPID
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Noble gasses in windows
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: Nick
• why can't fields be quantized too?
  • From: flames
• Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch
  • From: jimp
• Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Why is a-(vt-vi)/t the average acceleration?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• What are these symbols in this formula?
  • From: yotango
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Pyriform
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity
  • From: mountain man
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nuclear transformation energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: michaeld
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Reason for high presssure in air liquifier
  • From: Jeremy Samuels
• Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg 4: The "Generalized HUP"
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: kurdayon
• Re: Thermal physics - bizarre question of the day.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: kurdayon
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: donstockbauer
• Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Polly wants a cracker.
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Allais effect and 1999's tests update
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: kurdayon
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Worth of a PhD
  • From: Randy Poe
• Thermal physics - bizarre question of the day.
  • From: paul
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: T Wake
• Worth of a PhD
  • From: dbohara
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: quantum spaces
  • From: michaeld
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: carlip-nospam
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: m1ngleg02
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: m1ngleg02
• Re: Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: dirkbontes
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: PD
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: PD
• Fatio, Le Sage and the Cause of Gravity
  • From: d_hainz
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: michaeld
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: michaeld
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: kurdayon
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: kurdayon
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: ozone formation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Nuclear transformation energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Rettel
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Nuclear transformation energy
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• How fast does conventional wisdom say electrons radiate?
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Polly wants a cracker.
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33 repeat lightspeed.
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: mountain man
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: A true sequence of events?
  • From: dirkbontes
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Peter Kinane
• A true sequence of events?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Graham J Lee
• Energy conservation low in quantum mechanic.
  • From: kurdayon
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 22, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 3: Laws of Large Numbers
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: mike3
• Nuclear transformation energy
  • From: mike3
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies
  • From: OsherD
• Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory 2: Remedies
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Gravity travels at 33.33repeat lightspeed.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: John Sefton
• ozone formation
  • From: Zdenek Sperling
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Statistics Short-Changes Quantum Theory
  • From: OsherD
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Nick
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Nick
• Re: Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: mike3
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly
  • From: Cruithne3753
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Brad Guth
• Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP) 2: 2003 Paper
  • From: OsherD
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Androcles
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Ïîñîáèå ïî ðóññêîìó ÿçûêó
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The Ethical War Against Stem Cells
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Inertia: the measure of energy in a body
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Graham J Lee
• The Ethical War Against Stem Cells
  • From: Nick
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: quantum spaces
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Original Einstein manuscript from 1924 surfaces: "Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases -- Zweite Abhandlung", and more on the US PhD
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: quantum spaces
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly
  • From: Brad Guth
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Republican War Against Science (A New Book)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: quantum spaces
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Why can't this be done?
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: tj Frazir
• A Potentential Means to Obtain Light Speed and Beyond
  • From: rfraning
• Re: quantum spaces
  • From: michaeld
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: separable Hilbert space
  • From: michaeld
• Re: TROLL ALERT: Brad Guth - Killfile Accordingly
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: MOON Physics at 1% the cost of doing Tempel-1
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Greysky
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• separable Hilbert space
  • From: David Macmanus
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Neumaier's Modification of Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle (HUP)
  • From: OsherD
• quantum spaces
  • From: David Macmanus
• Why can't this be done?
  • From: mike3
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: test
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• This is absoluut fantastic, did Einstein see e=m.c^2 already in 1924?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Did The Big Bang Really Happen? YES!
  • From: T Wake
• The Republican War Against Science (A New Book)
  • From: W. Watson
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Did The Big Bang Really Happen? YES!
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Original Einstein manuscript from 1924 surfaces: "Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases -- Zweite Abhandlung", and more on the US PhD
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Http
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: hanson
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: hanson
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined
  • From: OsherD
• Can Photon have an Internal Structure??
  • From: Kyle
• Re: Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined
  • From: OsherD
• Variance of Quantum Operators is Incorrectly Defined
  • From: OsherD
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Get A Desktop PC For FREE!! - Completely Legit!!
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: Will Einstein survive even this?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: the softrat
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Nick
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: Mike
• Re: lenses
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: please help me to get a AIP conference paper, thanks.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: problem
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: jimp
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: AJW
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: Mike
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: AJW
• Re: problem
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: David
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Pyriform
• proton-proton coulomb repulsion inquiry
  • From: Kyle
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: Mike
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: David
• please help me to get a AIP conference paper, thanks.
  • From: Zhen Song
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: Mike
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: lenses
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: lenses
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: TokaMundo
• Get A Desktop PC For FREE!! - Completely Legit!!
  • From: bryandrinks
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: lenses
  • From: CWatters
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: pete
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Einstein's lopsided caricature of space and time
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: lenses
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: paranormal
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Evidence for the Existence of God
  • From: David Thomson
• Al Qaida Nukes Smuggled In US For Simultaneous Nuclear Attacks
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: lenses
  • From: Charles
• Re: Experimental verification of the Casimir attractive force (Lamoreaux)
  • From: Mike
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: markwh04
• Re: lenses
  • From: Androcles
• lenses
  • From: Joe Drake
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: tnlockyer@xxxxxxx
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: jimp
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: hanson
• Re: The reason why SR is incomplete
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The Space Stretch
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Photonic crystals -- remarkably fertile area of physics research
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Two² points of view Poor ignorant masses
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Two points of view
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: Mike
• Re: Uncle Al is a computer program
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Time energy uncertainty
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Experimental verification of the Casimir attractive force (Lamoreaux)
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Dirac's aether
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Mysterious Dark Energy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Von Neumann and Heisenberg on the HUP
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• The Mysterious Dark Energy
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Arnold
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: Androcles
• Fine Fabric: New, fast way to make sheets of nanotubes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Edward Green
• Strangelets-Hadron Fusion question
  • From: Alfred
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tokamak fusion
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Help with science for novel.
  • From: Mike
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: michaeld
• Help with science for novel.
  • From: Sugapablo
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: T Wake
• Time energy uncertainty
  • From: karan
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Arnold
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Mapping the domains of the sciences to its theories
  • From: mountain man
• Mapping the domains of the sciences to its theories
  • From: mountain man
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: the softrat
• Does Superstrings Theory solve single electron interference?
  • From: Arnold
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Eugene Stefanovich
• Re: Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether
  • From: Nick
• Last Tribulations on God, Spirit and the Aether
  • From: Laurent
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Mike
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Murat . H . Ozer
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: New Information re Gravity
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W
  • From: vanep
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: macromitch
• Re: "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: New Information re Gravity
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W
  • From: Mike
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• "Ph.D.s in America on the decline"
  • From: yared22311
• Re: Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: which metal for best reflectance of solar heat?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• New Information re Gravity
  • From: Charles
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Edward Green
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 19 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Is light deflected by electric fields?
  • From: Thomas Smid
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: Martin
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: simon
• Re: hubble deep shot
  • From: John Sefton
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 742 August 19, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein, and Davide Castelvecchi
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Symmetric language
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: hanson
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: fastest way to stir sugar into coffee/tea?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: tj Frazir
• Baby carrots freezing at T>273?
  • From: simon
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Dirac and the aether postulate
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: PD
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: footballdvds
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Symmetric language
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Spiral Star Shaped Cone Hole in rock. what could it be?
  • From: John Popelish
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• The technologist has created an electro-magnetically propelled...
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: Uncle Al
• sci.physics has reached the new elevated height of 0=m*0 courtesy Sam W
  • From: Mike
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: George
• Re: "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: PD
• Temprature on Moon Surface
  • From: George
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Mike
• Why is copper a good conductor but a poor magnet ?
  • From: unamerican
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Article: Pee-powered battery smaller than a credit card
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Article: Dwarf galaxy lights up dark matter debate
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: some representation theory questions
  • From: m1ngleg02
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• more candidate cosmic string lens pairs in HUDF (re comment by Levon Pogosian on astro-ph/0506400); also myriad minute bright blue sources, always on dark background mesh: Murray 2005.08.19
  • From: Rich Murray
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Spiral Star Shaped Cone Hole in rock. what could it be?
  • From: Paul Burke
• Re: GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: Sam Wormley
• GR is a Tower of Babel
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Mike
• Re: Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Charles
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Nanotubes make perfect diodes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• John Bahcall dies (Aug 18)
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Dirac and the aether postulate
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Dirac and the aether postulate
  • From: mountain man
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: problem
  • From: Mike
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Mike
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Mike
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Entropy question
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: The diabolic new world order agenda
  • From: macromitch
• Superconductivity and Coulomb Interaction 2: Gossamer Superconductor Properties
  • From: OsherD
• Entropy question
  • From: Craig Franck
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: doom
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: problem
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Traveler
• Re: bouyancy
  • From: PD
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: i think i need a rest
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: bouyancy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS - WITHOUT FORCE OF GRAVITY
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: PD
• Re: Can relative brightness of hydrogen spectra lines be predicted?
  • From: PD
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: PD
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: PD
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: PD
• Clarification on diode terms: 'electrostatic potential' and 'built-in potential'
  • From: JAH
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• How can electronics contribute to environmental solutions?
  • From: NSNBT
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Weight = mass center to G center
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• "Retic Postings and SPAM"
  • From: Xob
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: srp
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: TokaMundo
• HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 3: The Function of Position Claim
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Physics essay contest with cash award...
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Type III Sum of Squares
  • From: ggroups . anoop
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Why 911 Numbers Just Don't Add Up
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Why matter slows light
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: TokaMundo
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Kansas Citiy...the most stupid place on Earth
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• problem
  • From: karan
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? Dark Energy 0 hrz constant c
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Dirac and the aether postulate
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Traveler
• Re: bouyancy
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Pee powered battery generates 1.5 volts
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: No black holes just an extreme of gravity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? Dark Energy 0 hrz constant c
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Why matter slows light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Article: Cosmic CAT Scan - Observing the early universe--with ...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: panteltje
• Re: Kansas Citiy...the most stupid place on Earth
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? Dark Energy 0 hrz constant c
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: George
• i think i need a rest
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Why 911 Numbers Just Don't Add Up
  • From: T Wake
• Re: No black holes just an extreme of gravity
  • From: T Wake
• Dirac and the aether postulate
  • From: mountain man
• Re: Kansas Citiy...the most stupid place on Earth
  • From: Dr Photon
• a question on supercapacitor
  • From: nanoheart
• Re: Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Kansas Citiy...the most stupid place on Earth
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Superconductivity and Coulomb Interaction
  • From: OsherD
• bouyancy
  • From: gans1973
• Re: GR flaws emerge.. +SPOG.. #1 in news again
  • From: macromitch
• GR flaws emerge.. +SPOG.. #1 in news again
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: macromitch
• Re: HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: OsherD
• Re: No black holes just an extreme of gravity
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: No black holes just an extreme of gravity
  • From: the softrat
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: RP
• Re: HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Y.Porat
• HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions 2: The Uniform Claim
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: RP
• Re: Weight = mass x g
  • From: tj Frazir
• Photonic crystals -- remarkably fertile area of physics research
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS - WITHOUT FORCE OF GRAVITY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS - WITHOUT FORCE OF GRAVITY
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: David
• Re: Physics essay contest with cash award...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: persian ram
• Gravity-Driven Collapse of the Wavefunction
  • From: Mike
• Re: Can relative brightness of hydrogen spectra lines be predicted?
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Richard Tobin
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: donstockbauer
• Physics essay contest with cash award...
  • From: NSNBT
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Strange Indeed
• Re: Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Jason Stanidge
• Re: Nuclear Secrets
  • From: Strange Indeed
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Nuclear Secrets
  • From: David
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Why 911 Numbers Just Don't Add Up
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Igor
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: pete
• Re: electrons radiate at ~30c
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: macromitch
• Re: electrons radiate at ~30c
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Charles
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: donstockbauer
• Test posting - Re: Weather Control??
  • From: fin
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: TomGee
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Electrical and Magnetic Neurostimulation
  • From: alfuk
• Re: Electron tunneling??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Space time ??
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Space time ??
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Electron tunneling??
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: Greg Neill
• electrons radiate at ~30c
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Happy Dog
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? Dark Energy 0 hrz constant c
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: john_ramsden
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: tdp1001
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: What is a closed energy loop?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Weight = mass center to G center
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• HUP Fails Via Nonexistent Distributions
  • From: OsherD
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Won
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Mike
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Weight = mass center to G center
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? Dark Energy 0 hrz constant c
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• TI-NU-NI-NU-TI TI
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: pete
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: The truth is meant to be known
  • From: T Wake
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Weak HUP and Electromechanical Analogy Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Weak HUP and Electromechanical Analogy Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Size of an Iron Cube Six Times the Sun's Mass
  • From: Michael Ejercito
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Nick
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Nick
• Can relative brightness of hydrogen spectra lines be predicted?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Nick
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Nick
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: The truth is meant to be known
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Nick
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Weather Control??
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Shapes of Orbitals = Probability spaces??
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Charles
• Re: Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Weight = mass center to G center
  • From: tj Frazir
• Weather Control??
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: Nick
• Re: More on ether, Re: Discussions on relativity.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: More on ether, Re: Discussions on relativity.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations MORON
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Nuclear Binding Energy Calculations MORON
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: donstockbauer
• Wasn't this always the case?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: Nick
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: jimp
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 5
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: judamd
• Re: Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Simple water flow question
  • From: Charles
• Simple water flow question
  • From: Bruce W.1
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? Dark Energy 0 hrz constant c
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Nick
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: tgdenning
• Open or Closed? Dirac and Heisenberg, Dirac's aether
  • From: mountain man
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Androcles
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: mmeron
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: srp
• bound vs unbound system mass & binding energy
  • From: David
• Re: HUP nuclear questions
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 5
  • From: Androcles
• HUP nuclear questions
  • From: Patty
• pressurized airplane cabins
  • From: judamd
• Re: Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Air speed calculator.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: mountain man
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: mountain man
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Air speed calculator.
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Mathematical proof that period of pendulum swing is constant
  • From: Charles L
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Joe Anderson
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: tgdenning
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: 250 miles per gallon ,why Bush sets on hydrogen
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Joe Anderson
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Charles
• Re: General Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Two mirrors facing each other
  • From: Joe Anderson
• Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke
  • From: e1TymPadz
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• General Relativity
  • From: Zack
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Proof of Intelligent Design
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Proof of Intelligent Design
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Proof of Intelligent Design
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: OsherD
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 5
  • From: Uncle Al
• Proof of Intelligent Design
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Air speed calculator.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Air speed calculator.
  • From: AJW
• Re: What is a closed energy loop?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Air speed calculator.
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 250 miles per gallon ,why Bush sets on hydrogen
  • From: Ian Stirling
• De Broglie's Mistake
  • From: OsherD
• Re: 250 miles per gallon ,why Bush sets on hydrogen
  • From: Bob Eldred
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: donstockbauer
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Xob
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: tj Frazir
• What is a closed energy loop?
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: The fallacy of black holes
  • From: None
• Re: The fallacy of black holes
  • From: None
• Re: The fallacy of black holes
  • From: None
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: Reality of black holes
  • From: None
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• Can Gravity take Different Shapes?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• temper, temper
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: What is HAARP
  • From: Rene Tschaggelar
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: p6
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: mountain man
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: mountain man
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: mountain man
• IONS FEEL THE FIELD EFFECT
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• 250 miles per gallon ,why Bush sets on hydrogen
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Y.Porat
• halt all depo - that is the injection they give me twice a month in the dayly hospital for psychosis
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: curses
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: Martin
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: T Wake
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: DARTH VADER
• How does a lightsaber work?
  • From: DARTH VADER
• What is HAARP
  • From: DARTH VADER
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Nick
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Nick
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: Nick
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Nick
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Erasure Crosses Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Erasure Crosses Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Erasure Crosses Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: NightsoilDalits@RyugyongHotel
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Re: Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Greysky
• Re: (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: More on ether, Re: Discussions on relativity.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? no resistance to be wave
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? zerro wavelenth
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? zerro wavelenth
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Androcles
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 5
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Jerry
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Nightsoil Dalits@Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Tim Golden
• Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? zerro wavelenth
  • From: Nick
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Rolf Wilms
• Re: Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave? zerro wavelenth
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 5
  • From: Uncle Al
• Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Rolf Wilms
• Re: Weight = mass x g distance from center of mass and G
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: The reality of zerro wavelenth constant frequency
  • From: tj Frazir
• Please help with jackpot in many-worlds
  • From: Rolf Wilms
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: NightSoil Dalits @ Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: The reality of ether, was Re: Discussions on relativity.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: p6
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: hanson
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Nick
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: hanson
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Nick
• (electron <~> planet) Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• dimension in physics
  • From: mountain man
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: mountain man
• Article: Heavyweights battle to expose the naked quark
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 5
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem
  • From: Nick
• Re: The Big Bang's Little Problem
  • From: Uncle Al
• The Big Bang's Little Problem
  • From: Nick
• Re: dimension in physics
  • From: Strange Indeed
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke
  • From: e1TymPadz
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• Re: doom
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Nick
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Erasure Crosses Microscopic and Macroscopic Physics
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On theories of light: emission theories
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Thermal Inductance
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Air speed calculator.
  • From: ngdbud
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: franklinhu
• Are we observing Lorentz violation in gamma ray bursts?
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: curses
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Tpa
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Uncle Al
• Thermal Inductance
  • From: s.morra
• Re: On theories of light: emission theories
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Mass; force, and rates of displacement
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: At the Ryugyong Hotel
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence wavelenth 0 frequency constant
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Lady Chatterly
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: hubble deep shot
  • From: PD
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Re: Weight = mass x g sam the moron
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Glass a speed to frequency transformer?
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Basic question about atoms
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: On theories of light: emission theories
  • From: mountain man
• New physical sciences/mathematics positions at http://jobs.phds.org, August 15, 2005
  • From: PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Jerry
• Basic question about atoms
  • From: Matt Gregory
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Jerry
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Jerry
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Social Security," Fascis Corperate States Of America
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Math gene! :-)
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Greysky
• Re: Weight = mass x g
  • From: tj Frazir
• On theories of light: emission theories
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Doppler shift is evidence for varying speed of light.
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: Androcles
• Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
  • From: David
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Robert Kolker
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: What is a photon?
  • From: Androcles
• What is a photon?
  • From: Michael Komma
• Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Kansas Board of Education versus Evolution
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Androcles
• Re: plz answer my simple question...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: physics yes i do
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Just a big question...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: plz answer my simple question...
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: physics yes i do
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: where to study matter's structure?
  • From: CWatters
• Re: plz answer my simple question...
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Jerry
• Re: curses
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: curses
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: KEN SETO, THE RUNT OF THE AETHERIALISTS, AGREES DOPPLER SHIFT I...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Ian Stirling
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: plz answer my simple question...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: A snapshot of USA? :-)
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: plz answer my simple question...
  • From: Androcles
• A snapshot of USA? :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Math gene! :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• You must be "hateful" these days :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• plz answer my simple question...
  • From: Udayan
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation...
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Greysky
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Androcles
• Weak Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Combined With Special Relativity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Tachyons As Causal Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• curses
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Mike
• Microscopic reversibility
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: Ron Baker, Pluralitas!
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Y.Porat
• where to study matter's structure?
  • From: stefjnoskynov
• Re: physics yes i do
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: physics yes i do
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Tachyons As Causal Objects
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Tachyons As Causal Objects
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: CWatters
• Weak Heisenberg Principle
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Igor
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 3
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: James Stokes
• Re: Weight = mass x g tide
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Weight = mass x g tide
  • From: Bili Rubin
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: James Stokes
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Potential difference in a capacitive rf discharge
  • From: James Stokes
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Weight = mass x g tide
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Social Security," Fascis Corperate States Of America
  • From: Bili Rubin
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars
  • From: p6
• Re: Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars
  • From: Mike
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Local vs Nonlocal Physics/Mathematics Wars
  • From: OsherD
• Re: "Social Security," Chapter 25 of the Cato Handbook on Policy, 1...
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: good against bad
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: "Social Security," Chapter 25 of the Cato Handbook on Policy, 1...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weight = mass x g
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Myth 4: CO2 is the most common greenhouse gas.
  • From: Roger Coppock
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: good against bad
  • From: Greg Neill
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• article from sciencedirect
  • From: Mariusz
• Re: Sheldon Glashow refutes Bernard Haisch's "Origin of Inertia" Th...
  • From: Jeff
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Charles
• Re: What are the vibrational speeds of atoms/molecules in a solid?
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: "Social Security," Fascis Corperate States Of America
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Cosmic Computing: Simulating the universe
  • From: Darkwing \(Double Secret Disinformation Agent\)
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Darkwing \(Double Secret Disinformation Agent\)
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Galaxies are atoms and Quasars are photons.
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Edward Green
• Light as a particle in a wave?
  • From: Scismgenie
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: Schroedinger's Darn Cat
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Mike
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Cosmic Computing: Simulating the universe
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Edward Green
• good against bad
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: hubble deep shot
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: mountain man
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: Gbeat24
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Greysky
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Tachyons As Causal Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Article: Simulating the universe
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• Re: Tachyons As Causal Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Tachyons As Causal Objects
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Cosmic Computing: Simulating the universe
  • From: Nick
• Cosmic Computing: Simulating the universe
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Social Security," Chapter 25 of the Cato Handbook on Policy, 1...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: NASA brings back the Trash
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: What are the vibrational speeds of atoms/molecules in a solid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: Nick
• Re: What are the vibrational speeds of atoms/molecules in a solid?
  • From: Charles
• Re: What are the vibrational speeds of atoms/molecules in a solid?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Schroedinger's Darn Cat
  • From: Androcles
• Re: NASA brings back the Trash
  • From: Androcles
• Re: hubble deep shot
  • From: Androcles
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Androcles
• Re: doom
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: negative information
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Schroedinger's Darn Cat
  • From: macromitch
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Schroedinger's Darn Cat
  • From: jgreenfield@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Traveler
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Traveler
• Virtual particle interactions - Zero Point Energy PD
  • From: macromitch
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: energy
  • From: James Copeland
• Re: negative information
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gibbs Rant-a-dox
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: macromitch
• Eotvos Breaking News!!
  • From: Particle Labs
• Re: energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What are the vibrational speeds of atoms/molecules in a solid?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Novel Linac Field Generator
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: p6
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: Nick
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: p6
• Re: USA in the 2010s
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: Nick
• Re: Sheldon Glashow refutes Bernard Haisch's "Origin of Inertia" Th...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• What are the vibrational speeds of atoms/molecules in a solid?
  • From: Cygnus X-1
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: USA in the 2010s
  • From: markwh04
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: energy
  • From: zomoco1
• energy
  • From: zomoco1
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• energy
  • From: zomoco1
• Re: hubble deep shot
  • From: PD
• A Novel Linac Field Generator
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: new type of vortex in the Earth's magnetosphere
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: judamd
• hubble deep shot
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: hubble deep shot
  • From: Uncle Al
• WHAT'S NEW Robert L. Park Friday, 12 Aug 05 Washington, DC
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Just a big question...
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 4
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Just a big question...
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 4
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: PD
• Re: energy
  • From: PD
• A Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 4
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Schroedinger's Darn Cat
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: attractive slope exchange - how?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time andlocation...
  • From: T Wake
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• PHYSICS NEWS UPDATE -- Number 741 August 12, 2005 by Phillip F. Schewe, Ben Stein
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: energy
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Just a big question...
  • From: Charles
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: PD
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Tahc
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: energy
  • From: Strange Indeed
• Re: energy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive slope exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• energy
  • From: zomoco1
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: p6
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location...
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• some representation theory questions
  • From: m1ngleg02
• Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations 3
  • From: OsherD
• Schroedinger's Darn Cat
  • From: Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Herman Trivilino
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: vortex
  • From: S. Enterprize Company
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: vortex
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Just a big question...
  • From: the softrat
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: Gbeat24
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: mmeron
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: Sam Wormley
• basic question classical v. relativity
  • From: zxcv_890
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Aydin
• The ups and downs of doping
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Subatomic and Primordial Energies
  • From: Uncle Al
• Article: Is jiggling vacuum the origin of mass?
  • From: Robert Karl Stonjek
• The Subatomic and Primordial Energies
  • From: Dale Evans
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub
  • From: hanson
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: mark_tarka
• Innovation for the Lazy Resident (no helpful responses)
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: fMRI in the comfort of your own home
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: sci.physics = sci.physics.pub
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: T Wake
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Richard Henry
• fMRI in the comfort of your own home
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The morons do stack
  • From: T Wake
• Re: mimical force
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: doom
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: PD
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: NASA brings back the Trash
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it
  • From: Attila the Bum
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: vortex
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: vortex
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Who gains from CORPERATE STATES OF AMERICA
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: vortex
  • From: Puppet_Sock
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• vortex
  • From: myth
• Re: Galaxies expanding with space? The morons do stack
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: negative information
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Henry Lemington-Wholeflavors
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Dr Photon
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Egral
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: PD
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: SSJVCmag
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• negative information
  • From: Mike Maxwell
• Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke
  • From: Douglas Eagleson
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations 2
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Can sound waves tunnel through a vacuum?
  • From: RolandRB
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• How to plot magnetic field lines from flux density?
  • From: Gbeat24
• Re: Black body radiation
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: the softrat
• Re: At any particular time and location, a body's weight is a constant
  • From: Bob Cain
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Richard Henry
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Einstein (1905) Absurdities
  • From: donstockbauer
• Pseudoanalytic Generalized Riccati-Like Dirac and Schrodinger Equations
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: RP
• Is there any harmless radiation ?
  • From: Externet
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: p6
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Edward Green
• Bad News in X-Ray Astronomy
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: NASA brings back the Trash
  • From: donstockbauer
• Re: NASA brings back the Trash
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Edward Green
• NASA brings back the Trash
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bob Cain
• new type of vortex in the Earth's magnetosphere
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: Nick
• Re: GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: Nick
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: Nick
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: gravity and black holes
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: Schoenfeld
• GR perplexity for a layman
  • From: t
• gravity and black holes
  • From: conradeaton
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically
  • From: p6
• Re: mimical force
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: p6
• Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine
  • From: |-|erc
• Re: Velocity of Electrons
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Do Feuerbacher and Schoenfeld ever contribute anything?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: mimical force
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Solved equation resource
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Electron is not a point particle mathematically
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Evidence For Design In The Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Weight and the rate a body will free fall are time and location...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: mountain man
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: John C . Polasek
• Re: Black body radiation
  • From: mike3
• Re: Tucker basic cosmology
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: T Wake
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: WHY GREAT MINDS CAN'T GRASP CONSCIOUSNESS
  • From: T Wake
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: Time Not Relative
  • From: Nick
• Re: virtual particle interactions
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: franklinhu
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Hi twake!!!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: airplanes and buildings (again?)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Ken Muldrew
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it
  • From: Attila the Bum
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: A Natural Pit, Seven Gallon Pail Thermonuke
  • From: e1TymPadz
• Re: Time Not Relative
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Hi twake!!!
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Velocity of Electrons
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Tucker basic cosmology
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Black body radiation
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!)
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Ypoc
• Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: doom
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Tucker basic cosmology
  • From: feuerbac
• Re: Herc's copyright infinite energy machine
  • From: CWatters
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: feuerbac
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: feuerbac
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: feuerbac
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Re: Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Black body radiation
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Tucker basic cosmology
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Where does light go?
  • From: mountain man
• Herc's copyright infinite energy machine
  • From: |-|erc
• Re: Velocity of Electrons
  • From: AJW
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Black body radiation
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: Innovation for the Lazy Resident
  • From: mwmiller314
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes
  • From: OsherD
• Tucker basic cosmology
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Velocity of Electrons
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes
  • From: Nick
• Index To Dimensions 2: Additional Dimensional Subtypes
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Nick
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: p6
• Re: operator trace
  • From: Edward Green
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Edward Green
• Someday It Will All Be Clear
  • From: Charles
• Black body radiation
  • From: mike3
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Popular Handbook Microscope 1905 FA
  • From: night soil dalits
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Time Not Relative
  • From: Strange Indeed
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Mitchell Jones
• Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B
  • From: darthpup
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: A puzzle :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Popular Handbook Microscope 1905 FA
  • From: JaneyP
• Re: Time Not Relative
  • From: John Sefton
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Time Not Relative
  • From: Uncle Al
• Sanity versus insanity: Poison for EinSteinIans
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B
  • From: T Wake
• Time Not Relative
  • From: ?
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: dedanoe
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Hydrogen result causes controversy
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Toothpick Bridge Interest?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: airplanes and buildings (again?)
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: PD
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: bubble- fusion
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: doom
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: airplanes and buildings (again?)
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: doom
  • From: T Wake
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: T Wake
• bubble- fusion
  • From: heiack
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: T Wake
• Re: A puzzle :-)
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• A Realistic Hypothesis by Elmo Mottard
  • From: elmom15@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Link between single particle states and full wavefunction?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Fosbury a Flop ???
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is slowing orbits with the universe time?
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: mimical force for morons
  • From: tj Frazir
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Gregory L. Hansen
• Re: Kramers Kroning Relations and Causality
  • From: Richard Herring
• doom
  • From: kstocklmeir
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Kramers Kroning Relations and Causality
  • From: Tanja Wendt
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: Mike
• USA in the 2010s
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: Ptaah Conrad and Sarfatti
  • From: Richard Herring
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: A puzzle :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: A puzzle :-)
  • From: Math Freak
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi...
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi...
  • From: gilheron
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
• Toothpick Bridge Interest?
  • From: Toothpick Bridge Master
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Ken Oath
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: What is expanding with the universe?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM fi...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Help with the Physics of Evaporation
  • From: Zigoteau
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: ytyourclothes
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity
  • From: OsherD
• Triple Codes 5: 6-Dimensional Gauged Supergravity
  • From: OsherD
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Aydin
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Paul Stowe
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Aydin
• Re: PLANETARY ORBITS BY FIRST LAW OF THERMO
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Dirac Medal goes to condensed matter physicists
  • From: Sam Wormley
• PHYSICAL REVIEW FOCUS 8 August 2005 http://focus.aps.org/
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Schoenfeld
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Steven Gray
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: Llanzlan Klazmon
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Ken Oath
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: PD
• Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
  • From: Mark Fergerson
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: PD
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: the softrat
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: TomGee
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: Gravitational naughtiness
  • From: Jan Panteltje
• Re: attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: Sam Wormley
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question
  • From: Andy Resnick
• attractive force via particle exchange - how?
  • From: shevek4@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: PD
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: PD
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: markwh04
• Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Andy Resnick
• Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!)
  • From: markwh04
• Biological Convergence, Not Intelligent Design (was: New Ideas for Intelligent Design!)
  • From: markwh04
• Re: A puzzle :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Electroweak is a Yang-Mills force (was: Is the weak force really a force?)
  • From: markwh04
• Re: A puzzle :-)
  • From: Maleki
• Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: My proposal for an experiment to see if it is C+v
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Time is running out for Henry Haapalainen - Where is the meat?
  • From: Mike
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Gibbs Paradox
  • From: Matthew Lybanon
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: doom
  • From: PD
• Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!
  • From: T Wake
• Re: Bogdanov attack on Wikipedia
  • From: Bruce Scott TOK
• Re: Time, space and matter. Two out of three?
  • From: PD
• Re: "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: The Shuttle's foam insulation, and another question
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!
  • From: Quantum Mirror
• Re: New Ideas for Intelligent Design! You will believe!
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: Are There Any Actual Physicists/Scientists Here?
  • From: Uncle Al
• Re: If a PHoton has no electric charge how does it create the EM field ?
  • From: PD
• Re: The Philosophical Physicist, Statement No. 3
  • From: Uncle Al
• Humorous alternative to ID!
  • From: Quantum Mirror