Re: NMR combating terrorists

pmlonline@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
> Uncle Al wrote:
> > pmlonline@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > >
> > > I've heard enough of this terrorists stuff on the radio & TV talk
> > > shows. This has been the 3rd show I've heard in the last few weeks
> > > just on radio alone. It now seems almost all the experts investigating
> > > this field say that it is only a matter of time when a terrorist
> > > imports a nuclear bomb or dirty bomb into the U.S. or other countries
> > > and lights it off. What about NMR? After studying it a little it
> > > seems very possible to build a sensitive machine that can detect
> > > uranium and other atoms.
> >
> > Idiot. Do you have a few cubic meters of 5-10 tesla perfectly
> > homogeneous magnetic field? Are ya gonna outlaw ferrous shipping
> > containers?
> >
> > > I have no idea what materials they can use
> > > for an effective nuclear bomb.
> >
> > Idiot.
> >
> > > How difficult would it be to build such
> > > a machine where the individual stands on a certain spot and the machine
> > > scans for any atoms such as uranium? According to a NMR table, Uranium
> > > receptivity is about a million times less than hydrogen. I guess that
> > > means the EM signal from uranium is about a million times weaker than
> > > hydrogen. Is it still possible if the electronics is sensitive enough?
> > > Perhaps if the device is inside a shielded area such as a faraday
> > > cage.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts are greatly appreciated ... especially if it's your child
> > > or grand child that your input might one day help save from a nuclear
> > > fall out.
> > > Paul
> >
> > You get rid of alligators by killing the hatchery. Don't drive a bung
> > into the broad end of a funnel.
> >
> > --
> > Uncle Al
>
> It's people like you that sicken the public. All you can do is fight
> and call people idiot while terrorists are planning to import nuclear
> bombs. Try a different approach and think! Maybe you'll find a way.
> Personally I like people who believe and try rather than the likes of
> your kind!

Uncle Al amends his initial evalaution. You are not an idiot. You
are an idiot Liberal. Who else but an idiot Liberal would
characterize detonation of a nuclear device amidst civilians by a crew
of stateless operatives as not being terrorism?

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Inertia reducio ad absurdum
    ... >From: Uncle Al UncleAl0@hate.spam.net ... >being an idiot, cannot be educated. ... >locked with rotational period omega. ... >physicists and certainly more than 250,000 professionals and grad ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Can the con men explain this
    ... Uncle Al can not explain the paradox because it ... If you know you are an idiot, and we know you are an idiot, and each ... Where is the clock in the Mossbauer effect, Spaceshit, ... self-proclaimed "Creator of the Clock Malfunction Theory" ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Chirality and parity
    ... >> Uncle Al wrote: ... idiot. ... sound confident that they mean something, ... That must gall you. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Matter Generation by PI vs Seiberg vs Brane Theory
    ... > Crick and Watson via molecular biology and molecular genetics, ... Listen up, idiot: In 2000 Uncle ... Osher Doctorow spews disconnected pilfered jargon squealing in blatant ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How Dangerous is it to Handle Uranium Oxide Ore?
    ... I bought it from a geologist who says he's handled such material over his apparently long life time. ... Uncle Al wrote: ... I in by handling it? ... uranium ore is a modest radiation hazard. ...
    (sci.physics)