Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- From: The Ghost In The Machine <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 04:00:05 GMT
In sci.physics, RichD
<r_delaney2001@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on 6 Aug 2005 16:48:24 -0700
<1123372104.935213.279110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Uncle Al wrote:
>> Douglas Eagleson wrote:
>> >
>> > A True Null Theory
>> > Douglas Eagleson, 2005
>> [snip crap]
>>
>> > And the dependent variable is the fluence
>> > lost due to time dialation... And for the
>> > variable speed, a fluence is altered.
>>
>> Idiot.
>
> I think he meant "flatulence". In which case,
> it all makes sense -
Personally, I wish he were more fluent in English. :-)
>
>
> --
> Rich
>
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- From: Richard Herring
- Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- References:
- A Fine Null Theory Example
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- From: Uncle Al
- Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- From: RichD
- A Fine Null Theory Example
- Prev by Date: Re: A Bare Analogy
- Next by Date: Re: Flying Electric Generators silver to B2B
- Previous by thread: Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- Next by thread: Re: A Fine Null Theory Example
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
