Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
Ken S. Tucker wrote:
This was posted in Talk Origins,
"Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ"
By Bjoern, got no response, gee wonder why...
I think the lack of response to the BBT article is because
it's largely superseded by more advanced thinking, specifically,
Golowich's et al "Gravitational scattering of quantum particles".
Therein they show how to find the "red-shift" is proportional
to the density of the universe, and find a basis for the cosmological
constant, confirmed by General Relativity and Quantum Theory.
The paper shows us how the BBT and expansion are only apparent
when a rush to judgement is done, which itself is an important
lesson.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
Yes.
Space has density.
But the density is moving in all directions
simultaneously, and this determines Inertia
(and gravity).
John
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
... > dynamics@xxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb: ... >> I think the lack of response to the BBT article is because ... what on earth are you talking about??? ...
(talk.origins) - Bjoern BBT flops yet again.
... By Bjoern, got no response, gee wonder why... ... I think the lack of response to the BBT article is because ... Golowich's et al "Gravitational scattering of quantum particles". ...
(sci.physics) - Re: Request for review and approval: Big Bang FAQ
... > I think the lack of response to the BBT article is because ... > to the density of the universe, and find a basis for the cosmological ... redshift nor the cosmological constant. ...
(talk.origins) |
|
