Re: Bjoern BBT flops yet again.

Schoenfeld wrote: 
Ken S. Tucker wrote:

Schoenfeld wrote:


[snip]

Yes to all the above? So you support Golowich's proposal? Well, then
it should be no problem for you to provide a reference to the relevant
paper - which Ken didn't bother to do. I wonder why...

AJP 1989, it's a famous paper Bjeorn missed again.

If it's so famous, why is it not cited in all cosmology papers and books I've ever read, and why do essentially all cosmologists still support the BBT instead of Golowich's ideas?


Space has density.

More to the point, matter and energy in space has density. 

Wrong. Space has intrinsic non-zero energy density by mere consequence
of the uncertainty principle. I thought you said you were qualified.

Bjoern uses 1980 cosmology, 

Wrong. The Lambda Cold Dark Matter model which I use originated
approximately in the year 1995 and is the model currently used by
essentially all cosmologists.

Thanks to Ken for showing that he has no clue what he is talking about, as usual.


and 25 years of bandaids, and ear wax.

As I pointed out, the experts say BBT is dead. 

Ken mentioned no experts so far, only this Mr. Golowich, who is
no cosmologist.



Anything said about planckian universe is entirely speculative. 

Well, good then that my BB FAQ is not about the "Planckian universe".
Thanks for showing that you either did not bother to look at it, or
were too dumb to understand it?


How can one describe the universe so small

"so small"? Are you also one of the *many* people who think that the BB theory says that initially the universe was very small?

Thanks for showing that you, too, don't know what you are talking about.


without an understanding of Quantum
Gravity? I don't know how people manage to funding for that.

Err, hint: people who try to model these early times are essentially doing research on Quantum Gravity.

Thanks one again for showing that you don't know what you are talking about.


Bye,
Bjoern
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: overheard in Comet this morning
    ... >>>I suggest you actual bother to use a WS TV, ... > 16:9 TV showing a true widescreen programme next to a 4:3 one showing ... > LCD now. ... > Please send no unsolicited email or foodstuffs ...
    (uk.tech.digital-tv)
  • Re: Cubas Healthcare a model for the U.S. says CNN
    ... just too lame to bother with] ... Thanks for again showing what a slanderous liar you are Dan Christensen. ...
    (soc.culture.cuba)
  • Re: "Can I have a go" insurance
    ... Krusty cast forth these pearls of wisdom ... they bother to check MID I wonder, and if they did was it still ... showing up as insured by the owner? ...
    (uk.rec.motorcycles)
  • Re: Proof of Life on Mars
    ... How about showing some initiative and distilling ... bother. ... A fumbled 4/1 joke is like a fallen ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)