Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- From: Mark Fergerson <nunya@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 08:56:28 -0700
Autymn D. C. wrote:
Mark, there is no schwa, only u or e or somesuch near vowel.
Sure there is, because English is bastardized from so very many languages that many of its vowels are sufficiently indeterminate that they are indistinguishable. Wait, has somebody established an Academie Anglaise while I wasn't looking?
Why did you switch to Latin when translating from Greek? atomO = uncutred, uncut, uncutting, wight
Because assembling words from roots taken from different languages is allowed in English. ;>)
It should be obvious that Eagleson has some kind of OCD thing going about English. He should take a hint from John C. Polasek's sig file...
Mark L. Fergerson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- From: Richard Herring
- Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- References:
- A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- From: Douglas Eagleson
- Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- From: Autymn D. C.
- A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- Prev by Date: Re: Gibbs Paradox
- Next by Date: Re: basic question classical v. relativity
- Previous by thread: Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- Next by thread: Re: A Theory of Light- a unique aspect
- Index(es):