Re: Light as a particle in a wave?

Scismgenie wrote: 
IF Light can display properies as both a particle and a waveform, would
that negate the threshold  of Light as the ultimate speed limit of
mass?


No. Why should it?


Or does it imply that anything going AT the speed of light loses all
Mass characteristics?


No. Why should it?


Is the amout of energy EXPENDED to accelerate mass to the speed of
light considered to be infinite?


Yes.


(exponentially taking MORE energy to
push a smaller mass faster?)


Not exponentially, but increasing, yes.


Is there an Energy barrier of diminishing returns? 

Sorry, I don't understand this question.


In other-words the Speed of Light is probably FASTER than the practical
ability to gain acceleration? (except on a molecular scale?)


Sorry, I don't understand this question.


If Light is a particle, 

Not "is a particle". More like "consists of particles".


and that particle is scillating (frequency) 

No, photons are not oscillating.


and the frequency of oscillation is longer than a reference point,

Sorry, I don't understand what this is supposed to mean. What reference point? And what does it mean to say that frequency is "longer"? Frequency does not have a length.


do different frequency oscillations cause the particles to move at
different speeds in relation to the crossover point of teh oscillation?

Sorry, I don't understand what this is supposed to mean. What "crossover point"? What particles? The photons?


If so does that indicate that Light particles of a longer wavelength 

Photons don't have a wavelength. Only waves have wavelengths.


are traveling faster tham shorteones to cover the same distance of
linear travel in the same time reference,


No.


(actually covering more distance because of wider oscillations?) 

No.


Or it is represented that the
particle travels at a constant speed linearly,


Yes.


but oscilates
perpendicular to the direction of travel a greater vaariance from the
crossover reference? (wobble?)


No, again: photons do not oscillate.


If a light particle oscillates, 

It doesn't.


what does it oscillate AROUND, would it
be like an Orbit with a complementary mass to oscillate around?


No.


Excuse my simplistic non-educated questions. 

No problem. Ignorance is curable. ;-)


Bye,
Bjoern
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: breaking the light barrier
    ... To say, for example, "nothing that has mass can travel at or faster ... According to Einstein's relativity theory, then, ... >> at .9c relative to a stationary object, how is it that their speeds ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: A question about physicists and Einsteins SR Theory
    ... With the corrected mass law as proposed by Lorentz ... > need for different speeds and even if my speculation is wide of the mark ... Relativity works - but no one has tried the alternative to ... Indeed the kind of ether that some proposed in defiance of Newton was again ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Photon, Momentum, Mass
    ... physics collapses like a pack of cards. ... source at c+v so as to be c w.r.t that observer. ... mecahnisam that is make light trabel at different speeds it is ALWAYS ... I think that physicists have redefined mass several times since ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: What is the distance to a black hole?
    ... No, unless there is significant tension on the line, it will be let out ... mass was at the bottom of the line, but if the mass was cut off, the ... Well, if the mass were to go below the event horizon, you wouldn't ... > speeds up. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Do evolutionists have the answers? (dont be silly)
    ... speeds are discussed (say, when a rocket expels half of its mass as high ... there is no reason to presume that the proton has accelerated at ... I gave you two examples whereby you could ignore acceleration. ...
    (talk.origins)