Re: Basic question about atoms
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher <bjoern.feuerbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 16:12:51 +0200
Matt Gregory wrote:
Bjoern Feuerbacher wrote:
Matt Gregory wrote:
I'm not a physics enthusiast, all I know is what I learned in high school: that an atom has a positively charged nucleus which negatively charged electrons are in orbit around.
Unfortunately, this is already wrong: the electrons are *not* "in orbit around". Don't picture them as little marbles flying around the nucleus like planets around the sun. A better picture (still not the truth, only a visualization!) is that the electrons form "charge clouds" around the nuclei.
I've heard of it being referred to as a cloud. But if an electron was moving fast enough, and its distance to the nucleus wasn't constant (I assume there is some degree of wobbling and ellipticality in the orbit) then it would be like a cloud. I don't see what distinction is being made when they describe it as a cloud.
I wouldn't call a motion which makes it from the outside look as if there were a cloud an "orbit".
But it isn't this way. The electron doesn't move around and is at this place at this time and at another place later.
[snip]
Bye, Bjoern .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Basic question about atoms
- From: Matt Gregory
- Re: Basic question about atoms
- References:
- Basic question about atoms
- From: Matt Gregory
- Re: Basic question about atoms
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: Basic question about atoms
- From: Matt Gregory
- Basic question about atoms
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions about Mass Defect & Nuclear binding energies
- Next by Date: Re: hubble deep shot
- Previous by thread: Re: Basic question about atoms
- Next by thread: Re: Basic question about atoms
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|