Re: Evidence for the Existence of God

You can *** off ,too.
*plonk*
Androcles.

"David Thomson" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124565378.060001.129850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
| Lately there have been several people demanding of others proof for
the
| existence of a Creator God. Quoting from another poster to this
| newsgroup, Einstein said, "Certain it is that a conviction, akin to
| religious feeling, of the rationality and intelligibility of the world
| lies behind all scientific work of a higher order. The firm belief,
| which is bound up with deep feeling, in a superior mind revealing
| himself in the world of experience, represents my conception of God,
| which may, therefore be described in common parlance as `pantheistic'
| (Spinoza)."
| (FROM: Einstein, The World as I See It, London, 1955, p. 131.
|
| Searching Google we see that Pantheism is the belief that God exists
| within the world, being both the Creator and the created. So, if God
| truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is
| the very foundation upon which physical existence evolved.
|
| Physicists are smart. If such evidence were present, certainly Albert
| Einstein and others who held Pantheistic beliefs would have found such
| evidence. But what if certain facts weren't known during
| Einstein's time? What if physics itself was founded with a couple
| errors; minor, but significant?
|
| Coulomb's constant and Newton's gravitational constant were known
| to a fair degree of accuracy in Einstein's time. But the speed of
| light, permittivity constant, and permittivity constant were not known
| so accurately. Nor did physics ever discover the conductance constant
| of free space and find its use. But had Einstein had access to these
| accurate constants, he would have noticed the following relationship
| involving Coulomb's constant:
|
| k.C = c * Cd * u.0 / e.0
|
| Where k.C is Coulomb's constant, c is the speed of light, Cd is the
| conductance constant (2.112 x 10^-4 Siemens), u.0 is the permeability
| constant, and e.0 is the permittivity constant. Einstein would then
| have marveled at the construction of Coulomb's constant in terms of
| other absolute constants. He might also have realized that if the
| conductance constant were multiplied by the angular momentum of
| subatomic particles that it would give a value expressed in dimensions
| of distributed charge.
|
| h * Cd = e.emax^2
|
| where h is Planck's "quantum of action" constant, and e.emax^2 is
| expressed in dimensions of coulombs squared. The value of e.emax^2 is
| greater than that of e^2, where e is the elementary charge. This
| simple observation would have led Einstein to the Unified Force
Theory,
| which he spent most of his later years trying to discover.
|
| Had Planck's constant, the mass of the electron, the speed of light,
| and the Compton wavelength been known with the accuracy we have today,
| Planck's constant would have acted as the Rosetta stone, which would
| have unlocked great mysteries in quantum physics. Today, Planck's
| constant can be accurately expressed as:
|
| h = m.e * w.C * c
|
| where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is
| the Compton wavelength, and c is the speed of light. From the above
| equality, we can postulate that the mass of an electron is a quantum
| mass, the Compton wavelength is the quantum length, and the speed of
| light is the quantum velocity. Dividing c by w.C, we can deduce the
| result to be the quantum frequency.
|
| c / w.C = F.q
|
| where F.q is the quantum frequency.
|
| "Quantum" is not necessarily the smallest piece of something, it is
| the smallest whole piece, which remains stable. So the quantum length
| and quantum frequency, if they are truly so, will be the length and
| frequency used by God to measure and build the physical Universe.
They
| should be the rod and clock standards to which all existence is made.
| We can do a simple test to see if these are indeed the quantum length
| and frequency. We can factor all quantum constants by these quantum
| measurements and we should see a precise construction of the constants
| from them.
|
| For example, let us take Coulomb's constant.
|
| k.C = m.e * w.C^3 * F.q^2 / 16pi^2 * e.emax^2
|
| In the above equality, Coulomb's constant is shown to be exactly
| constructed from the mass of the electron, quantum length cubed,
| quantum frequency squared, and strong charge of the electron (as shown
| above).
|
| We can do the same thing for Newton's gravitational constant.
|
| G = w.C^3 * F.q^2/ m.a
|
| Where G is the gravitational constant, and when G is factored by w.C^3
| * F.q^2 then m.a is equal to 3.268 x 10^15 kg. This mass, when
| thoroughly examined, is the mass associated with the Aether. This
| mass, it turns out, is reciprocal mass. Just as time is linear, but
| its reciprocal is a cycle, mass is linear, but its reciprocal is also
a
| cycle. And since mass is the dimension that when given a quantity
| measures inertia, the mass associated with the Aether is inertia that
| cycles between positive inertia and negative inertia. Thus, the net
| mass when measured is zero. We see reciprocal mass in mechanical
| devices, too. A steam engine piston cycles through positive inertia
| followed by negative inertia. The net inertia of the piston after one
| full cycle is zero. The same thing happens with the mass associated
| with the Aether.
|
| It turns out that this mass associated with the Aether is not just
| floating around, isolated from other dimensions. This mass is part of
| a massive Gforce, which gave rise to the Aether. This Gforce is also
| the driver behind the three other forces of electrostatic force,
| electromagnetic force (same as strong force), and gravitational force.
| The so-called weak nuclear force is merely the proportion of
| electrostatic force to electromagnetic force. This Gforce has the
| quantum measurement structure of:
|
| Gforce = m.a * w.C * F.q^2
| Gforce = 1.210 x 10^44 newton
|
| The Gforce is indeed a huge value. When we look at the gravitational
| constant in terms of Gforce, we get:
|
| G = Gforce * w.C^2 / m.a^2
|
| The Newton gravitational constant is equal to the Gforce acting on a
| quantum surface per quantum distributed Aether mass.
|
| Just as the strong charge of the electron was found to be equal to the
| angular momentum of the electron (Planck's constant) times the
| conductance of the Aether, we can determine the strong charge
| associated with the Aether in the same way:
|
| e.a^2 = m.a * w.C * c * Cd
| e.a^2 = 5.021 x 10^8 coul^2
|
| And just as we expressed Coulomb's constant in terms of electron mass
| and electron strong charge, we can do the same with the Aether mass
and
| strong charge:
|
| k.C = m.a * w.C^3 * F.q^2 / 16pi^2 * e.a^2
|
| Now if we use the same structure as the equation with the Newton
| gravitational constant and Gforce, we would see how the Gforce
produces
| the Aether unit constant:
|
| A.u = Gforce * w.C^2 / e.a^2
|
| The Aether unit relates to Coulomb's constant as:
|
| A.u = 16pi^2 * k.C
|
| Just as the gravitational constant mediates the force between masses,
| and the Coulomb constant mediates the force between electrostatic
| charges, the Aether unit mediates the force between electromagnetic
| (strong) charges.
|
| Look close at the equations for the gravitational constant and Aether
| unit constant. The equations are the same, except that gravitational
| constant is Gforce acting on surface per distributed mass and the
| Aether unit is equal to Gforce acting on surface per distributed
| charge. And since there is only one quantum length and one quantum
| frequency, and the angular momentum of the Aether or subatomic
particle
| is essentially set by its mass, then the strong charge associated with
| any mass will always be directly proportional to the mass. This also
| means that the strong force will always be directly proportional to
the
| gravitational force. This constant mass to strong charge ratio
clearly
| states that strong charge is caused by angular momentum moving through
| the conductance of the Aether.
|
| We can see from the above equation that Gforce acting upon surface per
| strong charge is what causes the Aether unit. And if the dimensions
of
| the Aether unit are carefully examined, they are equal to the unit of
| rotating magnetic field. So a quantum unit of Aether is a quantum
| rotating magnetic field. By analyzing the Aether in terms of the
| masses of the electron and proton, we can deduce the geometrical
| structure of the Aether.
|
| But what is important for now, is that the gravitational constant,
| which is directly a result of Gforce, mediates the gravitational force
| of all linear mass. Also, the Coulomb constant, which is a
| substructure of the Aether unit, mediates the electrostatic force.
And
| of course, the strong force is mediated by the Aether unit, which is
| directly manifested by the Gforce.
|
| Modern physics does not recognize the strong charge of the electron,
| nor does it recognize a strong force for the electron. And yet, the
| Casimir equation is the same thing as the strong force equation for
the
| electron.
|
| According to Hendrick Casimir, the Casimir equation is written as:
|
| pi * h * c * A / 480 * L^4 = F
|
| where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, A is the area
| of the plates the force is acting upon, L is the distance between the
| plates, and F is the resulting force. Who knows where Casimir got the
| value of 480 from? In 1996, Stephen Lamoreaux measured the Casimir
| force to within 5% of the predicted value. The numerical part of
| Casimir's equation is suspect. We can see that the value of pi / 480
| is 3.3% different from 16pi^2. Changing the pi / 480 term to 16pi^2
| gets us closer to the measured value of the Casimir force. So by
| taking the special case of the Casimir force where the area is equal
to
| the quantum length squared and the distance between the plates is also
| equal to the quantum length, we can rewrite Casimir's expression as:
|
| h * c * w.C^2 / 16pi^2 ^ w.C^4
|
| Using the quantum measurements, we can devise a quantum unit of force
| equal to:
|
| forc = m.e * w.C * F.q^2
| forc = .034 newton
|
| So Casimir's equation can be written as:
|
| h * c * w.C^2 / 16pi^2 ^ w.C^4 = 6.333 x 10^-3 forc
|
| We can further modify the equation by replacing h * c / 16pi^2 with
k.C
| * e.emax^2 and simplify to:
|
| k.C * e.emax^2 / w.C^2 = 6.333 x 10^-3 forc
|
| We can further replace the Coulomb constant with the Aether unit
| constant and get:
|
| A.u * e.emax^2 / w.C^2 = forc
|
| The last equation is the strong charge equation for the electron,
which
| calculates the strong force between electrons. So, despite the
denials
| of modern physics, the Casimir equation is, in fact, proof that the
| electron does experience the strong force.
|
| But most important, we see that all the forces are unified through a
| single Gforce. And since the Gforce acts with the force of 1.210 x
| 10^44 newton of reciprocal force in each quantum of existence, and the
| entire physical Universe is made up of nearly infinite quantum Aether
| units, we could easily say that the Gforce is all powerful and all
| pervading. We could also say that the Gforce creates space-time, and
| thus creates the environment for subatomic particles, which are
| themselves the beginning of physical matter. We could also say that
| the Gforce is the one force that creates all the forces by acting on
| different aspects of subatomic existence.
|
| If God is described as being the Creator of the physical world, and is
| said to be all powerful, all encompassing, and present in all
creation,
| the Gforce could certainly be called "God". And thus, we have
| mathematical equations, based upon empirical data, that offer very
| clear evidence that God did create the physical Universe and resides
in
| that creation even today. So for those of you who ask to see the
| evidence of equations and empirical data that God created the
physical,
| you now have it.
|
| To see more of this theory, visit www.16pi2.com
|

.

Quantcast