Evidence for the Existence of God

Lately there have been several people demanding of others proof for the
existence of a Creator God. Quoting from another poster to this
newsgroup, Einstein said, "Certain it is that a conviction, akin to
religious feeling, of the rationality and intelligibility of the world
lies behind all scientific work of a higher order. The firm belief,
which is bound up with deep feeling, in a superior mind revealing
himself in the world of experience, represents my conception of God,
which may, therefore be described in common parlance as `pantheistic'
(Spinoza)."
(FROM: Einstein, The World as I See It, London, 1955, p. 131.

Searching Google we see that Pantheism is the belief that God exists
within the world, being both the Creator and the created. So, if God
truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is
the very foundation upon which physical existence evolved.

Physicists are smart. If such evidence were present, certainly Albert
Einstein and others who held Pantheistic beliefs would have found such
evidence. But what if certain facts weren't known during
Einstein's time? What if physics itself was founded with a couple
errors; minor, but significant?

Coulomb's constant and Newton's gravitational constant were known
to a fair degree of accuracy in Einstein's time. But the speed of
light, permittivity constant, and permittivity constant were not known
so accurately. Nor did physics ever discover the conductance constant
of free space and find its use. But had Einstein had access to these
accurate constants, he would have noticed the following relationship
involving Coulomb's constant:

k.C = c * Cd * u.0 / e.0

Where k.C is Coulomb's constant, c is the speed of light, Cd is the
conductance constant (2.112 x 10^-4 Siemens), u.0 is the permeability
constant, and e.0 is the permittivity constant. Einstein would then
have marveled at the construction of Coulomb's constant in terms of
other absolute constants. He might also have realized that if the
conductance constant were multiplied by the angular momentum of
subatomic particles that it would give a value expressed in dimensions
of distributed charge.

h * Cd = e.emax^2

where h is Planck's "quantum of action" constant, and e.emax^2 is
expressed in dimensions of coulombs squared. The value of e.emax^2 is
greater than that of e^2, where e is the elementary charge. This
simple observation would have led Einstein to the Unified Force Theory,
which he spent most of his later years trying to discover.

Had Planck's constant, the mass of the electron, the speed of light,
and the Compton wavelength been known with the accuracy we have today,
Planck's constant would have acted as the Rosetta stone, which would
have unlocked great mysteries in quantum physics. Today, Planck's
constant can be accurately expressed as:

h = m.e * w.C * c

where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is
the Compton wavelength, and c is the speed of light. From the above
equality, we can postulate that the mass of an electron is a quantum
mass, the Compton wavelength is the quantum length, and the speed of
light is the quantum velocity. Dividing c by w.C, we can deduce the
result to be the quantum frequency.

c / w.C = F.q

where F.q is the quantum frequency.

"Quantum" is not necessarily the smallest piece of something, it is
the smallest whole piece, which remains stable. So the quantum length
and quantum frequency, if they are truly so, will be the length and
frequency used by God to measure and build the physical Universe. They
should be the rod and clock standards to which all existence is made.
We can do a simple test to see if these are indeed the quantum length
and frequency. We can factor all quantum constants by these quantum
measurements and we should see a precise construction of the constants
from them.

For example, let us take Coulomb's constant.

k.C = m.e * w.C^3 * F.q^2 / 16pi^2 * e.emax^2

In the above equality, Coulomb's constant is shown to be exactly
constructed from the mass of the electron, quantum length cubed,
quantum frequency squared, and strong charge of the electron (as shown
above).

We can do the same thing for Newton's gravitational constant.

G = w.C^3 * F.q^2/ m.a

Where G is the gravitational constant, and when G is factored by w.C^3
* F.q^2 then m.a is equal to 3.268 x 10^15 kg. This mass, when
thoroughly examined, is the mass associated with the Aether. This
mass, it turns out, is reciprocal mass. Just as time is linear, but
its reciprocal is a cycle, mass is linear, but its reciprocal is also a
cycle. And since mass is the dimension that when given a quantity
measures inertia, the mass associated with the Aether is inertia that
cycles between positive inertia and negative inertia. Thus, the net
mass when measured is zero. We see reciprocal mass in mechanical
devices, too. A steam engine piston cycles through positive inertia
followed by negative inertia. The net inertia of the piston after one
full cycle is zero. The same thing happens with the mass associated
with the Aether.

It turns out that this mass associated with the Aether is not just
floating around, isolated from other dimensions. This mass is part of
a massive Gforce, which gave rise to the Aether. This Gforce is also
the driver behind the three other forces of electrostatic force,
electromagnetic force (same as strong force), and gravitational force.
The so-called weak nuclear force is merely the proportion of
electrostatic force to electromagnetic force. This Gforce has the
quantum measurement structure of:

Gforce = m.a * w.C * F.q^2
Gforce = 1.210 x 10^44 newton

The Gforce is indeed a huge value. When we look at the gravitational
constant in terms of Gforce, we get:

G = Gforce * w.C^2 / m.a^2

The Newton gravitational constant is equal to the Gforce acting on a
quantum surface per quantum distributed Aether mass.

Just as the strong charge of the electron was found to be equal to the
angular momentum of the electron (Planck's constant) times the
conductance of the Aether, we can determine the strong charge
associated with the Aether in the same way:

e.a^2 = m.a * w.C * c * Cd
e.a^2 = 5.021 x 10^8 coul^2

And just as we expressed Coulomb's constant in terms of electron mass
and electron strong charge, we can do the same with the Aether mass and
strong charge:

k.C = m.a * w.C^3 * F.q^2 / 16pi^2 * e.a^2

Now if we use the same structure as the equation with the Newton
gravitational constant and Gforce, we would see how the Gforce produces
the Aether unit constant:

A.u = Gforce * w.C^2 / e.a^2

The Aether unit relates to Coulomb's constant as:

A.u = 16pi^2 * k.C

Just as the gravitational constant mediates the force between masses,
and the Coulomb constant mediates the force between electrostatic
charges, the Aether unit mediates the force between electromagnetic
(strong) charges.

Look close at the equations for the gravitational constant and Aether
unit constant. The equations are the same, except that gravitational
constant is Gforce acting on surface per distributed mass and the
Aether unit is equal to Gforce acting on surface per distributed
charge. And since there is only one quantum length and one quantum
frequency, and the angular momentum of the Aether or subatomic particle
is essentially set by its mass, then the strong charge associated with
any mass will always be directly proportional to the mass. This also
means that the strong force will always be directly proportional to the
gravitational force. This constant mass to strong charge ratio clearly
states that strong charge is caused by angular momentum moving through
the conductance of the Aether.

We can see from the above equation that Gforce acting upon surface per
strong charge is what causes the Aether unit. And if the dimensions of
the Aether unit are carefully examined, they are equal to the unit of
rotating magnetic field. So a quantum unit of Aether is a quantum
rotating magnetic field. By analyzing the Aether in terms of the
masses of the electron and proton, we can deduce the geometrical
structure of the Aether.

But what is important for now, is that the gravitational constant,
which is directly a result of Gforce, mediates the gravitational force
of all linear mass. Also, the Coulomb constant, which is a
substructure of the Aether unit, mediates the electrostatic force. And
of course, the strong force is mediated by the Aether unit, which is
directly manifested by the Gforce.

Modern physics does not recognize the strong charge of the electron,
nor does it recognize a strong force for the electron. And yet, the
Casimir equation is the same thing as the strong force equation for the
electron.

According to Hendrick Casimir, the Casimir equation is written as:

pi * h * c * A / 480 * L^4 = F

where h is Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, A is the area
of the plates the force is acting upon, L is the distance between the
plates, and F is the resulting force. Who knows where Casimir got the
value of 480 from? In 1996, Stephen Lamoreaux measured the Casimir
force to within 5% of the predicted value. The numerical part of
Casimir's equation is suspect. We can see that the value of pi / 480
is 3.3% different from 16pi^2. Changing the pi / 480 term to 16pi^2
gets us closer to the measured value of the Casimir force. So by
taking the special case of the Casimir force where the area is equal to
the quantum length squared and the distance between the plates is also
equal to the quantum length, we can rewrite Casimir's expression as:

h * c * w.C^2 / 16pi^2 ^ w.C^4

Using the quantum measurements, we can devise a quantum unit of force
equal to:

forc = m.e * w.C * F.q^2
forc = .034 newton

So Casimir's equation can be written as:

h * c * w.C^2 / 16pi^2 ^ w.C^4 = 6.333 x 10^-3 forc

We can further modify the equation by replacing h * c / 16pi^2 with k.C
* e.emax^2 and simplify to:

k.C * e.emax^2 / w.C^2 = 6.333 x 10^-3 forc

We can further replace the Coulomb constant with the Aether unit
constant and get:

A.u * e.emax^2 / w.C^2 = forc

The last equation is the strong charge equation for the electron, which
calculates the strong force between electrons. So, despite the denials
of modern physics, the Casimir equation is, in fact, proof that the
electron does experience the strong force.

But most important, we see that all the forces are unified through a
single Gforce. And since the Gforce acts with the force of 1.210 x
10^44 newton of reciprocal force in each quantum of existence, and the
entire physical Universe is made up of nearly infinite quantum Aether
units, we could easily say that the Gforce is all powerful and all
pervading. We could also say that the Gforce creates space-time, and
thus creates the environment for subatomic particles, which are
themselves the beginning of physical matter. We could also say that
the Gforce is the one force that creates all the forces by acting on
different aspects of subatomic existence.

If God is described as being the Creator of the physical world, and is
said to be all powerful, all encompassing, and present in all creation,
the Gforce could certainly be called "God". And thus, we have
mathematical equations, based upon empirical data, that offer very
clear evidence that God did create the physical Universe and resides in
that creation even today. So for those of you who ask to see the
evidence of equations and empirical data that God created the physical,
you now have it.

To see more of this theory, visit www.16pi2.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
    ... > existence of a Creator God. ... > truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is ... > where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is ... is the mass associated with the Aether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
    ... | truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is ... | where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is ... is the mass associated with the Aether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Evidence for the Existence of God
    ... > truly exists, we will see evidence of God in quantum physics, which is ... > where h is Planck's constant, m.e is the mass of the electron, w.C is ... is the mass associated with the Aether. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc.
    ... how do you take apart Quantum Mechanics ... electron has wave behavior too. ... It's a sneaky way of describing the movement of aether corpuscles ... ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Taking Apart Quantum Mechanics, etc.
    ... how do you take apart Quantum Mechanics ... To take it apart, you need to take apart Quantum Electrodynamics, ... electron has wave behavior too. ... Aether concept demonstrated that the 4 fundamental forces ...
    (sci.physics)