Re: Can Photon have an Internal Structure??


Zigoteau wrote:
> Hi, Yehiel,
>
>
> > but Ghosh it is difficult to remember the spelling of [Zigothau]
> > it sound like French is it so ??
>
>
> The bestest froggiest cheese-eating-surrender-monkiest French name
> ever! By the way, it's Zigoteau, and I did tell you what it means, in a
> post a long time ago, and far, far away.

so it was long ago i a ashamed to admit i forgot it
so may be you will be kind to remind me ?? (:-)
(it seems that you are very strict to hide you real identity (:-)
i wonder why ......
----------
>
>
> > have you ever done pioneering science ??
>
>
> I like to think so.
>
> I'm not (much) into fundamental theories about the universe, or about
> what happens when you concentrate all the energy in my body into a
> small number of fundamental particles. I happen to be made of condensed
> matter, and am quite interested in that. I guess you could call it
> biophysics. I'm interested in self-assembly, of the sort that
> biological systems use to assemble functional molecular systems by
> their bootstraps. I'm interested in the real world, and making things
> that actually work. I believe that the world is not just a figment of
> my imagination, and am rather bothered by some aspects of modern
> quantum theory, so I'd like to sort those out. Since self-assembly
> involves molecular interactions and statistical mechanics of molecular
> systems, I'd quite like to understand those. In spite of a lot of
> claims to the contrary, I don't think either is properly understood.

have you heared about the two Israeli Nobelists
Hershko and Chechanover-
and their 'Ebiquitine' (probably bad spelling)
it is quite the opposite issue than you are doing
it deals with rather the decomposition of proteins in the body.
but still i think it might give you some insight about your job
and the way they got to it is a fascinating story for itself.
--------
>
>
> > i think i have and it started with wild (intuitive)guesses!!
> > some of them succeeded some of them failed.
>
>
> When you say "succeeded", what do you mean by that? I have never seen
> you talk about experimental evidence.
you have no idea what you are talking about ......
i am an engineer did you forgot it?
and have engineering edition (:-)
in engineering it is not enough just to talk....
--------

Is there any for e.g. your
> Circlons? With Galileo, I believe that the book of Nature is written in
> the language of mathematics. I've never seen you give any mathematics.
> Do you have any quantum field theory for your Circlons? How do you
> reconcile circular or helical motion with Noether's theorem?

you have a tremendous mistake if you think that any advance in physics
must be by calculus!!
i did it with a simple pocket calculator and (
listen carefully
a huge amount of trial and error
the most sophisticated computers that solve even calculus problems are
doing it how ???
by iteration!! got it ???
and once you are completely on a 'Virginie ground'
no calculus will help you
i doubt if you can understand it ....
all that can come later !!
no to my circlon
it is a guess but you have either to accept it or to leave it
IE without any credit to it better leave it .
and i can even put a mathematical target for it
actually a quite simple one
IE
to show that even if we take those curved lines from the acted
and acting particles we get the same
inverse square law of force
IE as you separate the two objects say to a double distance
the number of force line(per unit aria) becomes 4 times more diluted

and intuitively i think it is not a big problem to show it

can you give a hand to it??

you will be credited for it !! (IE get a half Nobel .. (;-))
and it will be a meaningful step for wards!!
i am too lazy for it i was born lazy ...
-----------
>
> You mention a book. Is any of it available on line? In Hebrew

Hebrew ?? here you surprise me again:
if i will sent it to you in Hebrew will you be able to use it ??..

or
> English? In view of your imaginative spelling in English, I hope it's
> been given a thorough editing by someone else.

i will send it only by an order of an known institute
not to a private that i dont know if he is not by any chance
and Iranian (:-) got me ???
--------
>
>
> > one day i am going to open a faculty about how to use intuition in
> > scince...
> > so ??? what are the conclusions out of it ??
>
>
> I think all great scientists use intuition. However intuition needs to
> be subjected to rigorous testing before it becomes science.

100 percent agreement!1
Cheers
Y.Porat
-----------------------
>
> Cheers,
>
> Zigotea.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Does "the difference between a and b" mean a - b or b - a ?
    ... To my intuition "the difference betwee 20 and 25 degrees C" ... Thomas's Calculus ... There is a difference between the colloquial meaning of some phrases, ...
    (sci.math)
  • a derivative puzzle
    ... Here is a simple "puzzle" where calculus and intuition do not seem ... Suppose we define some function gof the magnitude of the gradient of another function f. ... So the whole dg/df is zero as a result. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Moving on to real math - and help with an exercise
    ... Some recommendations (I'm interested in whether the Group agrees with ... I'd advise you relearn Calculus from the "ground-up" with Tom ... will brilliantly flesh out your intuition for Calculus; ...
    (sci.math)