Re: A true sequence of events?


Jan Panteltje wrote:
> About 1905 or 1906 Albert Einstein proposes C is a constant for all observers.
> (Papers on relativity).
>
> 1913 De Sitter confirms this by doing math with data from binary star systems:
> http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/desit-1e.htm
>
> but in doing so dismisses statistical evidence that c+v could be true:
> http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/desit-2e.htm
>
> 1923 De Broglie states that:
> <quote>
> Let us apply this to an atom of light. I showed elsewhere (2) that the
> atom of light should be considered as a moving object of a very small mass (
> g) that moves with a speed very nearly equal to (although slightly less).
> We come therefore to the following conclusion: The atom of light, which is
> equivalent by reason of its total energy to a radiation of frequency , is
> the seat of an internal periodic phenomenon that, seen by the fixed
> observer, has at each point of space the same phase as a wave of frequency
> propagating in the same direction with a speed very nearly equal (although
> very slightly greater) to the constant called the speed of light.
> </quote>
> http://www.davis-inc.com/physics/broglie/broglie.shtml
>
> 1924 Einstein does the derivation of the Bose-Einstein condensate,
> and refers to De Broglie's thesis from 1924 (same year).
> These are high resolution pictures of just discovered original papers from
> 1924 by Einstein:
> http://www.lorentz.leidenuniv.nl/history/Einstein_archive/Einstein_1925_manuscript/Pages/Einstein_1925_08.html
> He calls De Broglie's work 'sehr bemerkenwerte' (=very remarkable see
> footnote in that paper).
>
>
> And since the Broglie's reasoning is in fact based on c+v did Einstein see
> his postulate of c was broken?
> Now he had 3 options.
> 1) Join the quantum club, and lose face.
> 2) Prove De Broglie wrong (but no way, itwas big stuff).
> 3) Keep silent.
>
> He did choose 3.
>
> Einstein encountered more and more opposition, not only because he was a jew
> from the Hitler side, but also scientifically.
>
> 1933 Einstein leaves for the US, where he gets political asylum.
>
> 1940
> The quantum club starts to work on the A bomb, Einstein is NOT part of it.
>
> 1945 The quantum club has results, A bomb, Hiroshima, Nagasaki, but this
> technology should be kept from the rest of the world.
>
> Einstein is now launched as the hero and his (wrong) theory superimposed
> on humanity, while in the secret labs in Los Alamos the c+v and the correct
> periodic system are used (they found that was wrong too, but did not tell
> anyone).
>
> Such is the power of deception, today many still parrot Einstein's postulate.
>
> Einstein never made an other discovery after 1024 of cause, he was 'out'.
> If he did chose it that way, or if it was a deal with the US government,
> over to others to find out.
>
> A true sequence of events?


How do you get that de Broglie applied c+v? Regardless of your
interpretations of his comments on the subject, his conclusions are
easily reachable by applying special relativity to Planck's
energy-frequency relation. I think you're misrepresenting this big
time.

The way I've always understood it, the ballistic theory of light has
one major problem. And it's something that would be observable in
everyday electrodynamics. Since speed of light depends on both
permittivity and permeability, the speed of light could not change
without changing at least one of these factors. If permittivity and/or
permeability were dependent on the speed of the source, then the
linearity of Maxwell's equations will go right out the window. Yet
this doesn't appear to happen.

If you can construct a ballistic theory that keeps Maxwell's equations
in the nice and tidy form that we observe everyday, you're welcome to
it. But I don't think it can be done.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Source and Observer
    ... >How does Einstein, and those who subscribe to this feature of his ... the two observers will agree on the timing of the lightning strikes. ... >different speeds). ... The more we discuss Einsteinian relativity the more blatantly stupid it ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Drugstore or pharmacy?
    ... editors had asked the authors of prize-winning papers to describe how ... Einstein claimed to have not heard of the Michelson-Morley ... when he formulated his special theory of relativity, ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Why isnt the mathematician Henri Poincare acknowledged as the true discoverer of special relativ
    ... >>> obviously not the same concept as in Einsteins relativity. ... By thus inversing the logic you disagree with Einstein and Poincare: ... > separate the wheat from the chaff in several papers and put it together. ...
    (sci.physics.research)
  • Re: Big Picture of GR
    ... Einstein did not write the equation he wrote. ... consistent for a couple observers at a time. ... What I am looking for is that if we step outside a universe under SR ... the whole picture if the timelines are both observed from the outside ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Big Picture of GR
    ... Einstein did not write the equation he wrote. ... consistent for a couple observers at a time. ... What I am looking for is that if we step outside a universe under SR ... add a timeline so we can observe the universe ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast