Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: "David Macmanus" <macmanus@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 01:29:10 +0000 (UTC)
"michaeld" <michaeld@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1124753984.869219.125560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To work with things like |x>
> rigorously you need to get into the machinery of 'projection valued
> measures' or alternatively 'Gelfand triples'.
Ah, yes, the delightful rigged Hilbert spaces. Are these a cure all are
are there still problems with rigged Hilbert spaces? I guess they are
still not perfect because although they take in distributions like the
delta function, the wavefunctions themselves are still not
square-integrable. Is this still a problem?
--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: michaeld
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: Nick
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- References:
- separable Hilbert space
- From: David Macmanus
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: michaeld
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: David Macmanus
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: michaeld
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: Edward Green
- Re: separable Hilbert space
- From: michaeld
- separable Hilbert space
- Prev by Date: Re: Explaining the photo electric effect from the wave perspective.
- Next by Date: Re: Temprature on Moon Surface
- Previous by thread: Re: separable Hilbert space
- Next by thread: Re: separable Hilbert space
- Index(es):