Re: Entropy question
- From: Andy Resnick <andy.resnick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 08:52:47 -0400
Zigoteau,
Zigoteau wrote:
<snip>Hi, Andy,
Thanks for the references, which I will read. However, are you saying that statistical mechanics supersedes normal mechanics? I cannot go along with that.
I don't think that's what I'm saying. Although, to be truthful, I'm not sure what you mean by "normal" mechanics. Newtonian? Continuum? Quantum? All have their advantages and disadvantages, and (partially overlapping) spheres of applicability.
IMHO "emergence" is the second-last refuge of the scoundrel.
Yeah, I'm no fan of buzzwords either.
Yes, structures emerge, usually when they have been designed in (including evolution as the blind watchmaker). They can be explained adequately by statistical mechanics, but the systems actually obey the standard laws of mechanics, which cannot be discarded if you want to understand the kinetics of the process.
I don't think that's true at all- contact line motion cannot currently be explained by mechanics. Chemi-osmotic processes (Peter Mitchell's Nobel winning theory on cellular respiration) cannot be explained by mechanics, nor can any chemical-mechanical system like muscles. "Heat" can't be explained in terms of mechanics.
I'm leery of using the buzzword "designed" especially in the current political environment :)
-- Andrew Resnick, Ph.D. Department of Physiology and Biophysics Case Western Reserve University .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: Entropy question
- References:
- Entropy question
- From: Craig Franck
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Gregory L. Hansen
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Craig Franck
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Andy Resnick
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Andy Resnick
- Re: Entropy question
- From: Zigoteau
- Entropy question
- Prev by Date: Re: Dirac's aether
- Next by Date: Re: Entropy question
- Previous by thread: Re: Entropy question
- Next by thread: Re: Entropy question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|