Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher <bjoern.feuerbacher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 12:55:37 +0200
flames wrote:
[snip]
Recently it has been demonstrated by EMSFT for the hydrogen atom <http://www.unifiedphysics.com/UP_EM_self_fields_all_in_one_revb_Nov_08_04.pdf> that these E- and H-field form s are not applicable to sub-atomic charges.
The Maxwell equations (1a) to (1d) on which he bases his whole paper
are already formulated in a wrong way: the charge and current density he uses here make no sense at all. He says that he considers *discrete* particles; this implies that the charge and current densities have to be non-zero only in certain regions of space (for point particles, they have to be sums of delta functions). In contrast, the charge and current densities he uses here are non-zero
*everywhere*, i.e. what he considers is a space filled homogeneously
with charge and current!!!
Wow. This man *really* has no clue of quite elementary electrodynamics.
Bye, Bjoern .
- References:
- why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: flames
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: flames
- why can't fields be quantized too?
- Prev by Date: Lens Fabrication
- Next by Date: Re: Lens Fabrication
- Previous by thread: Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- Next by thread: Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|