Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: "Schoenfeld" <schoenfeld1@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Aug 2005 03:31:31 -0700
feuer...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> "motions of the E- and H-fields"? That makes no sense! Fields don't
> move!!! Again, he demonstrates that the does not know what "field"
> actually means in physics.
Coming from someone who failed like a school-boy to understand that R^2
is a field shows that it takes one to know one.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: donstockbauer
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- References:
- why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: flames
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: flames
- Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- From: feuerbac
- why can't fields be quantized too?
- Prev by Date: Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- Next by Date: Lens Fabrication
- Previous by thread: Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- Next by thread: Re: why can't fields be quantized too?
- Index(es):