Re: Entropy question



Zigoteau wrote:
Hi, Andy,



What have you got against the Blake theory?

I am unfamiliar with the Blake theory- do you have a reference?



Blake, T. D. et al.,J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, (1969) 421. Blake, T. D. In Wettability; Berg, J. C., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York (1993) Chapter 5, pp 251-309. Blake, T. D et al., Langmuir 13 (1997) 2164. Blake, T. D. et al., Phys. Fluids 11 (1999) 1995. Sharpe M. R. et al., Langmuir 18 (2002) 3549. Petrov, J. G.; et al., . Colloid Polym. Sci. 259 (1981) 753. Schneemilch, M. et al., Langmuir 14 (1998) 7047.

<snip>
Thanks!

Here's a few of my favorites:

Fan H. et al, Phys Fluids 13 (2001) 1615
Schaffer E. and Wong, P.-z., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 3069
Indekeu, J. O., Acta Phys. Pol. B 26 (1995) 1065
Marsh, J. A. et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2778
Ngan, C. G. and E. B. Dussan V., J. Fluid Mech 209 (1989) 191 (and references therein)
Spaid, M.A. and Homsy, G. M., J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 55 (1994) 249
Miksis, M. J. and Davis, S. H., J. Fluid Mech 273 (1994) 125




OK, I think we will have to agree to disagree. I don't think we are
disagreeing about the facts, just about ways of looking at the facts.
Vive la différence!


I'll drink to that... cheers!

--
Andrew Resnick, Ph.D.
Department of Physiology and Biophysics
Case Western Reserve University
.